User talk:Ciaran.london

Hi Ciaran.london! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:11, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Angela Rayner, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:55, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Therefore your repeated linking of politician and British are specifically mentioned, and England is considered a "major country" so should not be linked either.
Can I leave you to revert your recent overlinking edits? - Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 17:44, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:31, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ciaran.london. You have new messages at Mutt Lunker's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Mutt Lunker (talk) 23:13, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please stop inserting 'outgoing' in the infobox of

Ciaran.london (talk) 12:20, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Obama Obama Ciaran.london (talk) 16:31, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Barack Obama @Ciaran.london Ciaran.london (talk) 23:36, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Test Ciaran.london (talk) 15:27, 31 January 2021 (UTC) Ciaran.london (talk) 15:27, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shadow Secretary of State for Scotland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ian Murray.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Talk a bit about self. Stephenfryfan (talk) 18:59, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

👍 Ciaran.london (talk) 15:07, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 in Scotland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Douglas Ross.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in

page-specific restrictions

, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the

guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here

. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

FDW777 (talk) 08:04, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also the Martin McGuinness‎ article, as well as other Troubles related articles, is under a 1-revert-restriction, meaning no more than 1 revert in a 24 hour period. For maximum transparency your addition of Elizabeth Windsor to various articles was a revert, as well as being against the consensus at Talk:Martin McGuinness/Archive 2#Monarch/ appointed by. FDW777 (talk) 08:05, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's convention here to mention sovereign countries in lists of sister cities. Spreading your strong opinions to periphoral articles will not do you any favours here. I wouldn't mind seeing an independent Scotland, but Wikipedia reflects the world as it is, not necessarily as subjects in a particular city/region want it. This is at least your second time trying this; any more and you may be blocked. Graham87 17:31, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You won’t dare block me. Ciaran.london (talk) 12:28, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jamie Halcro Johnston, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Douglas Ross.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed Ciaran.london (talk) 20:02, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not disruptive. Ciaran.london (talk) 11:58, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy. Please, get a consensus first, before adding such edits to the infoboxes of Jill Biden & Doug Emhoff articles. GoodDay (talk) 18:19, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No need now Ciaran.london (talk) 18:55, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ciaran.london (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I would like to be unblocked. If you unblock me I’ll just use this account, not the other one and I will only make constructive edits.

Decline reason:

This does not explain why you were violating

WP:SOCK. Yamla (talk) 14:34, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla: I did not know that having multiple accounts was a violation of Wikipedia rules, I only discovered this after I was blocked. Ciaran.london (talk) 15:33, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ciaran.london (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I would like to be unblocked as I didn’t know that having multiple accounts was against Wiki rules. And if I’m unblocked, I would only operate from this account and make constructive edits.

Decline reason:

No. You've been editing logged-out as recently as today. SQL^{Query me!} 15:39, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ciaran.london (talk) 19:13, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

? Ciaran.london (talk) 11:07, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't know? Yet you continually swapped between accounts to support your own position and get around editting restrictions? Sorry but I believe it. Canterbury Tail talk 18:39, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I used different accounts before I had any knowledge of the rules in place. Ciaran.london (talk) 12:06, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has opened an investigation into

sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ciaran.london, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations

, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 20:37, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Neveselbert you have two accounts and are not blocked for sock-puppetry. Ciaran.london (talk) 17:55, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]