User talk:Circeus/2008

First, I forgot to thank you for your input above. I'm sure I'll get around to fixing the articles above someday but don't know where to begin with the Asteraceae. Thought you might know offhand.

Anyway, thanks for this. I've known about those categories for quite some time but I don't prefer to use them for a couple reasons: 1) There's no demarcation listed on the category pages. Is Alabama really part of the Eastern US? Depends on where you live. People living in New Jersey consider Ohio to be part of the midwest, whereas when I lived in Washington state and talked about "going back east" people always assumed I meant east of the

Yo, my mistake, explanation and request for your assistance on my talkpage. Skomorokh ^confer 01:47, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, not long ago you updated infobox:Mountain with a parameter to allow photo resizing. Can you do the same for

]

DYK!

On Creston Valley, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page .

Congrats! Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 15:05, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 6 February, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Yellowtail scad, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page .

Congrats! Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 02:38, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I still feel a bit out of my depth given my track record with these things, shall I put this, Entoloma sinuatum up at GA, can you see anything to massage? cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 05:14, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you have participated in Wikipedia:Featured sound candidates in the past. There are now two candidates and the project appears to be abandoned. If you could look at the candidates and vote it would be appreciated. Zginder ^{(talk) (Contrib)} 00:44, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK one last request for a while... this flunked at FAC a few months ago and I scrubbed it up and got it through GAN soon after to keep a stable version etc. I've asked someone for a range map, but apart from that I am not sure what else to do with it before a crack at FAC. It is a bit thin compared with others I've run through but there really isn't much more I think I can add. Also, would you bother with some external links of things which are already linked in references? All input appreciated. These ones where there are few/no other editors active in a wikiproject can be tough...cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:43, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated it at FAC - a prelimiary second opinion as per the FAC nomination page would be helpful if you're not too tied up at present. (i.e. what is extraneous and what is good to keep). cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 22:56, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 05:37, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help on the Whistler Sliding Centre. It earned a DYK earlier today. I really appreciate it. Chris (talk) 22:09, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am revising

]

DYK notice

On 18 February, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Wharncliffe Crags, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page .

Congratulations! Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 05:00, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I note you have worked on this infbox template. The template appears to me to be almost designed to produce nonsensical results. See also Talk:County of Nairn. Laurel Bush (talk) 16:45, 18 February 2008 (UTC).[reply]

take a look: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines#Maintain_Wikipedia_policy

i'll await your apology, thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.39.2.83 (talk) 21:05, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The IP address is displaying trolling behavior. I'm in discussion with an admin about how to handle the situation. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 21:40, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I filed an ANI incident. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 21:47, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He was blocked for 31 hours, starting a few hours ago. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 00:16, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 19 February, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kunzea ambigua, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page .

--BorgQueen (talk) 17:59, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since you are doing the tabular adjustements on the bobsleigh, luge, and skeleton(sport) tracks that are already done for which I appreciate, could you please do it on the other tracks shown in the template at the bottom of the article. Your use of tables is a whole lot better than mine. Thanks. Chris (talk) 23:47, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Chris (talk) 01:47, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 20 February, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Henry Frederick Conrad Sander, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page .

--BorgQueen (talk) 20:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On February 26, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Douglas Barton Osborne Savile, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks again, Blnguyen (photo straw poll) 02:11, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your deletion of the flag icons on that template because you didn't say why you think this change is warranted. I like the flags and it is consistant with virtually all the other navboxes of this type, why should we change? Kevlar67 (talk) 03:47, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If there is a consistant policy to remove the flags from the others of this type I will glady follow along, and will start removing them from some of the others. However, I think we should consult Wikipedia:WikiProject International relations first. Kevlar67 (talk) 19:28, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Circeus, it's been a while! I'm going on holiday for about a week and I was wondering if you could do me a bit of a favour. I just looked at the article Tsuga canadensis and discovered that some egregious changes had been made by every plant person's favourite editor (I'll let you guess). If you look at the history you'll notice that the said person removed English units, altered citations in what I see as an unhelpful way, and even made a second ecology section. I saw these changes as having a negative impact on the article. The first part of the favour would be to compare the current revision with the previous ones to see if you agree with me (and if not to make changes accordingly if you have time). The second part would be to ensure that my hard work in fixing it back up doesn't end up being reverted in my absence (assuming you feel my edits are helpful). So if you could add the article to your watch list and keep an eye on it, I would appreciate it very much. Thanks! DJLayton4 (talk) 17:37, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Circeus, if you have a minute, this page in French [3] is by a mycologist and I was wondering if there was any extra info to be gleaned about its usage in Europe which wasn't already in the Gyromitra esculenta article. English can be pretty lousy sometimes WRT fungi coverage....Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:57, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]