User talk:Citation Needed
Welcome!
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
Also, when you post on
Cease it now
--
Just so you know...
I emptied your fridge...
and did this. Brohoof! ViperSnake151 Talk 01:53, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Fallout: Equestria for deletion
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fallout: Equestria is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fallout: Equestria (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Ryulong (琉竜) 07:07, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
A cheeseburger for you!
![]() |
Your comment here [1] made me laugh. Howicus (talk) 16:25, 28 May 2013 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for June 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
ANI discussion
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 02:49, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Removing AfD template
Hello
as a courtesy, i would like to notify you that i have mentioned you on User talk:GSK#Comment_.2B_Active_Worlds, however there is no obligation for a response.
if it is acceptable for me to ask, who was your father that worked with AWI? --Roy Curtis (talk) 03:47, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fallout: Equestria.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! talk) 12:12, 19 June 2013 (UTC)]
I've closed this nomination as its only aim was to disrupt the encyclopedia. Please find better ways to contribute here than pulling a stunt like this.
Also because I ended up on your posting to your userpage instead of your talkpage unaware, please add a link to your talk page immediately in your signature, which is required by
Speedy deletion nomination of Dogecoin
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
the guide to writing your first article.to help you create articles.You may want to consider using the Article Wizard
A tag has been placed on
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
Nomination of Dogecoin for deletion
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dogecoin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dogecoin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. atomicthumbs‽ (talk) 01:29, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Dogecoin
No offense meant, here - it's a good article, but (sadly) I don't think the subject matter belongs on Wikipedia at this point. Maybe if someone commits an enormous dogecoin crime... atomicthumbs‽ (talk) 03:16, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Issue with your username
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Citation Needed", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because Your current username may be misleading/confusing as it is so similar to an existing wikipedia tag.. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. I also see that you were originally named 'Intelligent Deathclaw' - why the change? Dialectric (talk) 03:52, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- The signature is purposely made smaller to reflect that. Plus, I also left a short notice that explains the special difference between me and the template. I just changed my username because it wasn't taken and it seemed so reflective of the culture of the site. I thought it was a crime that nobody had even bothered to claim it. [citation needed] 04:14, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
I'm really sorry to say this, but I object to your username. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:55, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
I just want to say that I added your name to the UAA page, not to report you, but to get others' opinions. I think you are very nice. You have a very nice way about you. Please don't be offended. Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:05, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- Result: This handy link. By the way I am not personally bothered if the sig gets modified a bit, just try not to make it too confusing or people will complain. As a username in the page history, or in contributions I think it is fine. The problem is that people use real links to [citation needed] tags in discussions. You don't want to look like one of them. -- zzuuzz (talk) 19:15, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi
Cool accountname. Cool userpage. Much respect. There's even a shade of blue named after you. bobrayner (talk) 00:50, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fallout: Equestria, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at
Thank you for your attention.
Brilliant
I guess you're getting tired of hearing this by now, but your username is great[
Disambiguation link notification for January 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Your recent edits
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:08, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fallout: Equestria
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/1d/Information_icon4.svg/48px-Information_icon4.svg.png)
Hello Citation Needed. It has been over six months since you last edited your
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fallout: Equestria}}
, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 22:21, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Request for comment on ANI
Hi, I just made an entry on ANI that you may be interested in, I'm trying to see if there is anything policy-wise that can be done to improve articles on cryptocurrencies across the board. Looking forward to your input. Breadblade (talk) 20:38, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
Request for comment on ANI
me too. entry on ANI I feel our difference on comments are best talked about with a 3rd party as judge. I have made an ANI too about how you refuse to talk to me and repeated choose to keep subjective info in the page. lets allow wikipedia protocol to settle this. cheers. KR 16:01, 29 January 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevoras (talk • contribs)
Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6c/Peacedove.svg/60px-Peacedove.svg.png)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "CryptoCurrency". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 17:11, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Crypto
i understand there's debate on whether worldcoin is notable enough. and the debate is on going still. "turn to worse" is ur personal assessment only. most will say Worldcoin hit another milestone with today's news: http://voiceofrussia.com/news/2014_01_30/Worldcoin-speed-of-transactions-5546/
if conclusion later is to remove worldcoin, i will accept. but for now it looks like a bunch of uninformed ppl just trying to surppress news instead. KR 06:10, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
January 2014
- I hope you're not discouraged by this, you do a lot of valuable work on this topic. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:06, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- I'm not. Citation Needed | Talk 19:54, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Unblock request
{{unblock|This seems really silly knowing that my block ends in a day, but after finding out about [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kevoras]], I would assume that my violation of 3RR is nullified because I ended up reverting the edits of a then-unknown sockpuppeteer per [[WP:NOT3RR]]. [[User:Citation Needed|<font color="red">Citation Needed</font>]] | [[User talk:Citation Needed|<font color="red">Talk</font>]] 23:15, 31 January 2014 (UTC)}}
- Technically no because you weren't reverting puppets of a blocked user. But I'm happy for you to be unblocked in any case. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:57, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
- I've disabled the request since the block expired now a few hours ago. Like Callanecc said, the block was valid as they weren't a blocked user at the time you were reverting. only (talk) 11:48, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
April 2014
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Some of your edits appear to be disruptive. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Stop tagging valid articles with Articles for deletion (AfD) tags. These edits are unhelpful and useless. -Fnlayson (talk) 07:50, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
GamerGate
While I agree the article should be kept, let's have a clean close. By expressing a "strong keep" opinion, you meet the
MfD nomination of User:Citation Needed/The Dogecoin Weightloss Challange
Convention panel participation
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Meetup/San Diego#January 2016. Thanks. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 01:55, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Merger discussion for Vitalik Buterin
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/52/Merge-arrows.svg/50px-Merge-arrows.svg.png)
An article that you have been involved in editing—Vitalik Buterin —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 16:35, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Coinye for deletion
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Coinye is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coinye until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.