User talk:CommanderOzEvolved

Category:Rocket launches in fiction, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —swpb^{T go beyond} 16:11, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I kind realized the category was repetitive anyway, so I'm letting others deal with this. CommanderOzEvolved (talk) 05:08, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redone with reference. Is it alright? CommanderOzEvolved (talk) 01:18, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Getting better! There is nothing in the source to support cause and effect. It may also be undue weight for the lead/lede, so better moved elsewhere in the article. Best wishes.SovalValtos (talk) 05:18, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I discovered that Botswana has a river-going contingent attached to the ground forces instead. Second reference added to reinforce that. CommanderOzEvolved (talk) 05:55, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good find the river source. We cannot say "As Botswana is landlocked, the country has no sea-going navy" as although sourced that it is both landlocked and has no navy, being landlocked is not supported by the source as the reason for no navy. Some landlocked countries have navies, and others do not, for various different reasons. Best wishes.SovalValtos (talk) 01:20, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CommanderOzEvolved. You have new messages at DBigXray's talk page.
Message added 15:57, 14 July 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

DBigXray 15:57, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CommanderOzEvolved. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have temporarily enabled rollback on your account until {{{expiry}}}. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing
  Twinkle
  .
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of
  good faith edits
  .
• Rollback should never be used to
  edit war
  .
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 03:06, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious cases of vandalism only? Will do. Also, thanks alot! CommanderOzEvolved (Comm-Net) (Action-Log) 04:17, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New signature! CommanderOzEvolved (talk) 14:07, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m the great grandson of Edward Sherriff Curtis. My edits are absolutely correct! He was born February 19, 1868 and his middle name is spelt with 2 rs. Pa.johng (talk) 17:48, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I did a google search of "edward sheriff curtis february" and his birthday is reported widely (including at commons) as February 16 1868. Are you sure your version is correct? Doesn't seem like it so far. CommanderOzEvolved (talk) 17:56, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 16 was a typo in one of Mick Gidley’s books which he regrets and has corrected since. It would appear no one else does their home work. He has it corrected in his latest book, page 4 “ Edward S. Curtis and the North American Indian Project in the Field. In addition to that, I have multiple family documents which state February 19, one of which is Curtis’ diary from the last year of his life. Pa.johng (talk) 19:13, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In that case you should post your documents up somewhere reliable on the Internet so that they can be cited by the article regarding that guy's birthday. I am also emailing the book's author for confirmation. CommanderOzEvolved (talk) 05:11, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The same IP you reverted in Islam and violence. Can you please take a look at the article mentioned. Thanks. Kleuske (talk) 13:01, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It was already protected and reverted to original state by the time I got back to respond. Thanks for your concerns though, and I will check the IP edits elsewhere. Sorry I was referring to Islam and violence article. Man this IP is disruptive on multiple pages. CommanderOzEvolved (talk) (contribs) 02:33, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think Islam and violence does not have enough reverts to warrant page protection yet, so we will have to see what 68.33.77.244 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) does next.

I just wanted to say that Ejaz Durrani is a Pashtun born in Punjab, since his last name "Durrani" is a Pashtun tribe. This means he shouldn't be under the "Punjabi People" category but rather the "Pashtun People" category, since that would be misleading. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2406:3003:2004:4EC:89D0:7546:DABF:E695 (talk) 07:28, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds alright to me. Please add source next time though. CommanderOzEvolved (talk) (contribs) 07:31, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Swarm ♠ 20:41, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll try to be responsible with it to the best of my ability. CommanderOzEvolved (talk) (contribs) 00:09, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called

page-specific restrictions

, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the

Arbitration Committee's decision here

. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Galobtter (pingó mió) 09:25, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CommanderOzEvolved. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CommanderOzEvolved. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The content removed is due to the inaccuracy and the bias it could bring to legal proceedings. Therefore l, should be removed until the legalities are resolved. Please continue with removal until further notice. Greg Ellingson (talk) 14:12, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not used to dealing with cases like these, usually. My main focus is vandalism and/or trolling, both overt and subtle forms. If you want the information in question removed, I would not be the one to contact, but I will not be involved in this any more. CommanderOzEvolved (talk) (contribs) 14:49, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:05, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]