User talk:Connorgurney1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, connorgurney1, and

welcome to Wikipedia
! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

Join WER 18:44, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Thank you!
Connorgurney1 (talk) 08:54, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Connorgurney1, you are invited to the Teahouse

Teahouse logo

Hi Connorgurney1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at

TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host
)

talk) 20:43, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
Thank you! I'll see you down there! :)

Deleted article

Hi, Connor. Sorry for delay in responding. First of all, have you read the guidelines on notability and verifiability? If not, a quick glance should let you know why your article on AristotleTec was deleted and will probably never be suitable for inclusion - or at least, not for a few years yet. Also, there is guidance on conflicts of interest, which would appear to be relevant here. However, the reason for deletion is that the article contained no actual information. Okay, there was an information box indicating that it was meant to be about a company, but no actual text. You should use the sandbox for experiments and test pages before transferring them to article space. I hope this helps. Deb (talk) 08:40, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Assistance required

Two questions:

  1. How can I rename a page?
  2. Is it against rules to remove items from a talk page as it is getting long?

Connorgurney1 (talk) 13:29, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Connorgurney1, I have two answers.
  1. See
    WP:MOVE
    (make sure you read the "Before you move a page" section)
  2. Yes, technically speaking. Long talk pages should be archived rather than simply deleted. See
    WP:ARCHIVE
    for more info.
If you want more help, stop by the
help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 14:21, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
Articles for Creation
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment they left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 05:54, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]