Those bandits murdered my grandmother in March 1945. U must explain why that article is NPOV first. Stalin was stupid - even 24 mln russian solgers victims in II WW
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions " link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page . Thank you. Videmus Omnia 03:29, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
]
Дорогой Conscious. Желаете следовать правилам с точностью до точки? - это ваше право. Я ни сколько не собираюсь вас осуждать за снятие шаблона {{
NowCommons
}} с данного изображения. Но параллельно, вместе с шаблоном, вы также снесли (переместили на отдалённую) важную информацию о наличии подобного изображения на Викискладе - установленная вами версия страницы описания вводит случайно зашедшего участника в заблуждение, например, он может подумать, что изображение удаляется по причине не правильной лицензии - вы не оставили никакой дополнительной информации о причинах удаления на старнице описания. Многие участники не заходят на соот.страницу обсуждения удаления изображения с целью экономии своего траффика.
Alex Spade 12:57, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
...Я перепутал категории с секциями. :) Если есть желание высказаться по поводу секции трансферов/значимых игроков/единого формата, добро пожаловать на страницу обсуждения . — Ash063 06:31, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Please see my note on the talk page there. I am not an expert on templates, but please come back if there is something wrong and I will try to correct it. This image is a modified/cropped version of Rustam_Kasimdzhanov.jpg on Commons, created by User:Stefan64 . Maybe you just wanted this information adding to the description - please feel free to do so. Regards Brittle heaven 23:40, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Hi Conscious. You removed the speedy deletion tag on
vandalism
". Is adding bogus articles not vandalism? or do You have knowledge about a fruit called Pillope?
As mentioned on
T |
C ) 12:47, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
OK, thanks. That also explains T |
C ) 13:00, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Thanks for deleting my archive that were out of date - wait a minute that doesn't sound right. Oh well, thanks anyway. Onnaghar tl ! co 13:44, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
]
Was there any reason why you deleted the Group Stage draw pot tables from last season's UEFA Champions League? The reason why I'm asking is that I've done the same to this season's and there are some people persistently reverting it. Kingjeff 02:28, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Hey. Thanks for helping with these diagrams I really appreciate it! Unfortunately there is an error in Image:ArgGeo 11092007.svg . Pichot did not play for Argentina. Would you be able to fix this then upload it again? You may want to double check other errors as well. Don't worry I mucked up one earlier also; fortunately Dale pointed it out to me! Thanks. - Shudde talk 02:36, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Spetember
Thanks - version control error... (GMT).
Thanks for uploading
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
]
Thank you very much for your support at my RfA . Regards, Jogers (talk ) 09:45, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Hello, please take a look at Wikipedia talk:Featured pictures#Mess with USS Shaw . Conscious 05:27, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Did that answer your question? -- Esemono 10:48, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Actually, as of this writing, Canada can achieve 2nd place in their pool. If they beat Japan and Australia, they can finish with 10 points. If Fiji also beats Wales and Australia, and denies each team a bonus point, then Fiji would win the pool and Australia, Wales, and Canada would be level at 10 points. With each of the three tied teams having beaten one of the others, it would be decided by scoring differences, and any of the three could come out on top. That said, I acknowledge that only two of these four results are plausible, and only one is likely.
Update: Oops...I see that you argued the same thing on the RWC 2007 discussion. Sorry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alanmjohnson (talk • contribs ) 06:34, 21 September 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Click there to open your card! → → →
Dear Conscious,
Thank you for your participation in Monoxide
for nominating me.
]
Credits
This design was brazenly stolen from inspired by Тhε Rαnδom Eδιτor 's RFA Thanks, which in turn was inspired by Phaedriel's RFA thanks .
You reverted my edits. Image on commons has the same resolution but are bigger (368 KB on en wiki - 941 KB, on commons) - so that is the same image but with a diffrent compresion. So - image on commons has smaller compresion. Then can you tell me why you are not delete that image ?
Pmgpmg
11:28, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
PS. Reply on my talk page. I don`t check watchlist on en wiki.[ reply ]
How is your nomination to transfer the Featured Picture status different from mine?
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/USS Shaw explodes
Why didn't you just comment onto mine? Why would you create a second nomination? -- Esemono 21:45, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Hi, I saw your name on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Russian_Premier_League_map.png as the uploader of that picture. As far as I understand, the image will be updated every season to show the current teams playing in Russian Premier League. I wanted to suggest to rename the image to Russian Premier League 2007 map, so it can be posted on
Artyx
© 10:39, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Okay, thanks! The images are here: T
C 09:30, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion . If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page . Thank you.BetacommandBot 13:37, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
I noticed that you deleted Orpha Klinker article 30 January 2007. What was your reasoning for deletion? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Phil Fish (talk • contribs ) 13:20, 28 October 2007 (UTC) --Phil Fish 13:26, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Then there would not be a problem if I added a new page that I wrote myself? --Phil Fish 17:27, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
I'll do my best, Thanks--Phil Fish 17:56, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
There have been a series of proposals to initiate a Featured List of the Day on the main page. Numerous proposals have been put forth. After the third one failed, I audited all
WP:LOTD) 01:04, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
talk) 07:25, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media ).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions " link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion . Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:14, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Featured article review, but you don't seem to have been informed, even though you did a large proportion of the work to get it to FA. It's at
Wikipedia:Featured article review/FIFA World Cup . In other matters, remember maybe a year ago when I asked you about possible connections between Manchester City and FC Moskva? Well they've only gone and done
this !
Oldelpaso 11:02, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
I would like to discuss with you on this matter at the image talk page . American Imperialist (talk ) 01:13, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see
Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on
notable subjects and should provide references to
reliable sources that
verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon }}
to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Closedmouth (talk ) 12:19, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
talk) 06:23, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
[ reply ]
What Wikipedia is not
").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
sign your comments
with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the
articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you.
BJBot (
talk ) 19:59, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
talk) 06:24, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
[ reply ]
WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the
bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that
this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (
talk ) 14:30, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
[ reply ]
I noticed you deleted the article on the notable founder of Sybase. {04:30, February 9, 2007 Conscious (Talk | contribs) deleted "John S. Chen" (Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2007 January 28/Articles)}
This has left a red link in other articles. There was some mention of copyright problems. Would you mind explaining that problem? Thanks for your time. Bru non ia 00:45, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
talk) 23:03, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Congratulations!
WP:LOTD) 07:41, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
[ reply ]
You deleted William S. Powell as a copyvio when the University of North Carolina Press failed to release the text of the article under the GFDL. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=William_S._Powell I wanted to let you know that I have just finished creating a non-copyvio article on this historian which I hope adequately demonstrates his notability. --Eastmain (talk ) 02:36, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[ reply ]
I just asked a question at
Phil Bridger (
talk ) 12:39, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
[ reply ]
I have nominated List of fictional magic users , an article you created, for deletion . I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional magic users . Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Vivio Testarossa Talk Who 11:58, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[ reply ]
I have nominated
]
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media ).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions " link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion . Thank you. BJBot (talk ) 12:36, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[ reply ]
I have nominated List of Mario cast members , an article you created, for deletion . I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Mario cast members . Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Judgesurreal777 (talk ) 00:25, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[ reply ]
If you haven't seen it already, see my comments at
talk) 06:20, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Hi, I noticed your recent contribution on the article World Chess Championship 1990 . Nice work, I find these knockout diagrams hard to make! Lately, I have been working on the List of chess grandmasters , and I was wondering if you could help me. There are a few grandmasters still missing birth dates. Since you read Russian, you might be able to find some of the birth dates that I was unable to find. Would you mind, in particular, having a google search for:
Salauat Izmukhambetov (????.??.??)
Alibek Ibragimov (????.??.??)
Aidyn Guseinov (1952.??.??)
Nebojsa Nikcevic (1965.??.??)
Thanks a lot! Voorlandt (talk ) 09:55, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[ reply ]
Thank you so much for checking and the information on Guseinov. I suspected he had died from the FIDE records, but couldn't find a reference for it. Best regards, Voorlandt (talk ) 12:22, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[ reply ]
Jay 21:01, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
[ reply ]
I think you misinterpreted the comment (by me) in
FIDE World Chess Championships 1998-2004. "only had to rely on a rapid playoff once" was a compliment to Anand - i.e. he only went to playoffs once, easily the least (and hence best) in any of those FIDE knockout world championships. It could be deleted on the grounds that it's an editorial comment, or moved to the new
FIDE World Chess Championship 2000 article.
Great work on those new articles by the way. Once they're complete, we should delete the
talk) 09:46, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
[ reply ]