User talk:Critisizer

No, all discussions should stay on the talk page or be archived. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 02:26, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are doing a great job, keep on! Shoteh (talk) 18:04, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thank you for creating the WikiProject Typography! I think there was an urgent need for this project. There is a lot of work to do building up this project, so I think we should invite some other Wikipedians. I am really excited and looking forward to great cooperation. Kind regards, — Tirk·fl ^“…”  07:35, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is to say Hi and introduce myself! As you will see, I've added my name to the list. As a former typographer and graphic designer I have more than a passing interest in the subject. I have made contributions to a number of typography-related articles, and will endeavour to continue to do so. I tend more towards biographies of typographers, type designers, etc. and have a number of edits to Gill, Froshaug, Eckersley, Lubalin, Morrison, Tschichold, Ruari Mclean, et al to my credit. Not to mention Comic Sans (no, don't mention it!) I can't promise to be a regular contributor, but I will do my best. Cheers – Agendum (talk) 14:16, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the project! — Tirk·fl ^“…”  14:19, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris 07:41, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Nadia Talent has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A single publication doesn't establish

WP:Notability (persons)

.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{

Just so you know for future reference, we categorize people by what they are, not by subject keywords or characteristics of the article. For example, a pomologist goes in Category:Pomologists, not Category:Fruit, and a botanist goes in Category:Botanists, not Category:Botany. And neither of them goes in Category:Biography, which is for things where the topic is a biography. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 03:15, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On the talk pages, usually just {{

WPBiography}} is fine. The information you need to enter right away is =yes or =no in the "living" field, =Last Name, First Name in the "listas" field and =yes in the "s&a-work-group" if it's a scientist or academic. "Class" and "priority" are fields you don't have to fill in if you're not familiar with the system of how those things are rated; in theory somebody will eventually come along and assign the appropriate ratings. Sometimes there are extra project templates that you can use, but you'd need to consult Wikipedia:WikiProject Science to determine what the most appropriate subproject is for each individual person (or "WikiProject Sports" if you write one about an athlete, etc., but I'm guessing you're interested mainly in scientists :-) Bearcat (talk) 04:22, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

A tag has been placed on Nadia Talent, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Smartse (talk) 21:04, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not create other articles on people who are clearly not notable. Please see

WP:BASIC for some very simple rules that were clearly not met in this case. Smartse (talk) 21:05, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

A tag has been placed on

]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Proposed deletion of File:Dried Etrog.jpg

The file File:Dried Etrog.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

talk) 01:00, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Proposed deletion of File:Musaiaca.jpg

The file File:Musaiaca.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

talk) 01:00, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply

]