User talk:CurrentWeather

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Virtual Fire Drills and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Virtual Fire Drills, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:03, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CurrentWeather! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 19:03, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CurrentWeather! The thread you created at the archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both talk) 19:03, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply ]

A tag has been placed on Elijah Joyce requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  GILO   A&E⇑  23:26, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Elijah Joyce. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. You may contest speedy deletion, but you may not remove a speedy deletion tag from a page that you have created. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:39, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (Elijah Joyce owns multiple school records and has been noticed on an official Ohio Swim Website (Metro Buckeye Conference) and has been noticed by another school on their website. Metro Buckeye Conference is also not an institution. The Speedy Deletion is for CSD A7, which states, This applies to any article about a real person, individual animal, commercial or non-commercial organization, web content,[8] or organized event[9] that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, with the exception of educational institutions. In my mind, that basically states the article only has sources from institutions. If that is the case made against the article, then there is no reason for the speedy deletion as Metro Buckeye Conference is not an institution but an official thing of High School Swimming. ) --CurrentWeather (talk) 23:31, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Your contested deletion statement actually misses the A7 criteria concerning educational institutions. What that line actually means is that any school (

Hello, CurrentWeather, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Elijah Joyce. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 10:55, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It has nothing to do with formatting or phrasing, and not so much content but sources.

If you're going to write an article about anyone or anything that is not

1) Choose a topic whose

notability

is attested by discussions of it in several reliable independent sources.

2) Gather as many

professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources you can find. Google Books

is a good resource for this. Also, while search engine results are not sources, they are where you can find sources. Just remember that they need to be professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources.

3) Focus on just the ones that are not dependent upon or affiliated with the subject, but still specifically about the subject and providing in-depth coverage (not passing mentions). If you do not have at least three such sources, the subject is not yet notable and trying to write an article at this point will only fail.

4)

Microsoft Notepad or Notepad++, and not in something like Microsoft Word or LibreOffice

Writer. Make sure this summary is just bare statement of facts, phrased in a way that even someone who hates the subject can agree with.

5) Combine overlapping summaries where possible (without

arriving at new statements that no individual source supports

), repeating citations as needed.

6)

copyright violations or plagiarism

.

7) Use the Article wizard to post this draft and wait for approval.

8) Expand the article using sources you put aside in step 3 (but make sure they don't make up more than half the sources for the article, and make sure that affiliated sources don't make up more than half of that).

Doing something besides those steps typically results in the article not being approved, or even in its deletion.

If you are writing about yourself, or someone or something you are connected with (such as a friend, family member, or your business), the following steps are different:

0) If the subject really was notable, you wouldn't need to write the article. Remember that

articles are owned by the Wikipedia community as a whole, not the article subject or the article author

. If you do not want other people to write about you, then starting an article about yourself is a bad idea.

8a) If the article is accepted, never edit it again. Instead, make

talk page

.

8b) If the article is rejected, there will be a reason given. Read it carefully and closely. If there are links in the reason, open them and read those pages.

Ian.thomson (talk) 11:23, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CurrentWeather! The thread you created at the archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both talk) 19:01, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply ]

Hi CurrentWeather! The thread you created at the archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both talk) 19:01, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply ]

You an complain to me directly if you like. As an administrator I am held accountable for my actions to the editing community, and for now that community includes you. If you have something you want or need to bring up with me feel free to do so, just know that you may not get the answers you wanted to get as we work to getting it figured out together. TomStar81 (Talk) 13:27, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, CurrentWeather. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! S0091 (talk) 19:03, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CurrentWeather. It has been over six months since you last edited the