I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
You seem to be highlighting negative statements about Utica, New York without citing sources or while misrepresenting the sources. For example, there was no source for the claim that "The Utica educational system has been a shambles and below national and state standards for decades. Union demands, wasting of resources and the city's corruption and cronyist atmosphere seems in part the cause", and the source given for the claim that "The course of the Utica Boilermaker is the most repaved section of the city, as many other parts of the city are devastated with potholes and haven't been repaved in decades." doesn't actually say so. Adding unsourced claims of this nature is not acceptable. I'll revert these edits. Huon (talk) 22:12, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The subheading about 'sex scandal' that you included in this article has been removed and replaced with more neutral and properly-sourced language. Please refrain from including harmful or libelous material in this article unless it is genuinely-sourced with reliable references. Thanks,
There is currently a discussion at