User talk:DJ Autagirl

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Wikipedia has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the
  introduction
  .
• The following is the log entry regarding this message:
  talk) 07:18, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The recent edit you made to Wikipedia has been reverted, as it removed all content from the page without explanation. Please do not do this, as it is considered vandalism; instead, use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see here for what to do. Thank you. hmssolent\^{You rang?} _{ship's log} 07:21, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. hmssolent\^{You rang?} _{ship's log} 07:28, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bull Terrier has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the
  introduction
  .
• The following is the log entry regarding this message:
  talk) 02:15, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Hello! DJ Autagirl, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 TT me 18:14, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited In Nuce, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rock. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DJ Autagirl, Before nominating articles editors are expected to follow

• Also you should read
  this as AFD isn't for clean up solutions either. –Davey2010^Talk 00:20, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Please also read
  WP:AFDHOWTO
  . It comes across as devious that you chose to leave no edit summary at all when nominating these pages for deletion, rather than the recommended "AfD: Nominated for deletion...".

• Please explain how no edit summary implies deviousness. DJ Autagirl (talk) 19:12, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• If other users have added a file to their watchlist, they are entitled to expect major proposals – such as nomination for deletion – to be described explicitly in the edit summary. That is why the HOWTO page recommends this practice. – Fayenatic London 13:10, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• In these cases, it would have been better to propose merger/redirect to a list of characters, not outright deletion. See {{
  mergeto
  }}.
• Moreover, in several cases you remvoved the DISPLAYTITLE template for no apparent reason. Perhaps you wanted to re-use the braces? An easy way to insert a fresh set is by clicking on {{}} in the Wiki markup panel below the edit window. If you don't see this panel, click on the "Insert" pop-up menu bar and change it to Wiki markup. Hope this helps. – Fayenatic London 13:46, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at Jack Gordon, you may be blocked from editing. Eteethan (talk) 21:16, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Low-rise (fashion), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 05:54, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Stop mass AfDing things with the same reason. You've been warned about disruptive behaviour before. Take a minute and carefully look at the article you're about to nominate, check for sources, and then proceed to create a nomination for deletion based off of the article. Don't nominate as "fancruft" with "no real world coverage" and then not explain the relevance of those to the article. Grognard Extraordinaire Chess (talk) Ping when replying 07:24, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. Stop creating AfDs for characters without first checking to see if a merge is within the realm of possibility. There's no way that you couldn't have known that this is the proper way to do things, after you received a warning from

I would like to request that you not AfD any other character pages for the time being and that you instead work on learning policy a bit more. You've made less than 300 edits and so far you aren't really showing that you really understand policy or that you're listening to what people are saying to you. If you make another round of nominations like this one, you run a very strong risk of getting blocked from editing as a disruptive editor.

• Initially I was just going to warn you, but a look shows that you've opened a whopping 26 pages for characters without doing
  (｡◕‿◕｡) 12:00, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• I 100% support
  Tokyogirl79s
  block - You've had the best part of 3 months to read and understand the whole AFD and Merge process....- If you don't understand it then you ask someone .... You don't ignore the warnings and advice and just carry on regardless!,

It obviously goes without saying If you repeat the above after your 48hr block then you'll probably be blocked indefinitely without hesitation so unless you wanna be blocked I strongly suggest you do a bit of reading.... –Davey2010^Talk 15:26, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Mondo TV, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ElectricBurst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 00:30, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Kath Soucie. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 15:45, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• IMDb is not considered a
  WP:BLP articles and even more so for personal data. I'm not issuing you another warning because at least you provided an edit summary, but don't re-add the DOB into the article.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:46, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Hello, DJ Autagirl. It has been over six months since you last edited your

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:04, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DJ Autagirl. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DJ Autagirl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Do any of you users remember Gaz Membrane from Invader Zim? Many episodes of that show tell us, the audience, that while Gaz does know about Zim's identity and goals, she never tries to stop him because she does NOT care at all about his many attempts to conquer Earth. When I request to be forgiven and unblocked, what I want is for you users to please TRY to adopt the same attitude towards my behavior on Wikipedia that Gaz Membrane adopts towards Zim's behavior on Earth. Why can't any of you users ever consider doing that favor for me? Why?? DJ Autagirl (talk) 04:37, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't see any reason why Invader Zim is in any way related to your block for sock puppetry. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the

talk) 10:27, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DJ Autagirl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Put it this way: In Invader Zim, the antagonist, Dib, sometimes tries to get his sister, Gaz, to assist him in stopping the protagonist, Zim, from conquering the Earth. Whenever this happens, Gaz states that while she is aware of Zim's identity and goals, she does NOT care at all about his activities. What I am trying to say is this: Just as Gaz Membrane chooses to NOT care at all about Zim's activities on Earth, similarly, I really wish that you users would choose to NOT care at all about my activities on Wikipedia, no matter how questionable they may seem. This is what I mean by apathy and indifference. DJ Autagirl (talk) 17:46, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No. We do care about Wikipedia, which in turn makes us care about others' questionable conduct on Wikipedia. Try Uncyclopedia if you want a wiki where people don't care about others' activities. Huon (talk) 18:03, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 Vanjagenije (talk) 11:41, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]