User talk:DMacks/Archive 20

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

James Lick High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mount Hamilton

Octadecaborane (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Dimer

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Any way to to revert this spam at once? Abhi (talk) 15:48, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

 Done DMacks (talk) 16:22, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Also did a bunch more manually (lots of IPs and other editors involved).

• imusti.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

May have to blacklist that site. DMacks (talk) 16:53, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello, DMacks. You have new messages at P747AH's talk page.
Message added 15:19, 2 July 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Original Barnstar

I'm sorry for doing this in this way... I'm a new Argentinian member of wikipedia and I don't know how to fix an error in one of its articles .. furthermore, my english is not the best.. Please, if you can edit "Helium".. it says :"the largest use (about 22% of the total in 2008) is in cryogenic applications" but there is a graphic that shows a cryogenic use of 32%... I don't know what's wrong. Thank you! SirLOGOS (talk) 02:57, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Welcome! I will leave a welcome message with some helpful links on your user talkpage. Your English is good enough for me.

I agree that the numbers look confusing! The values are described with details to explain the difference: 22% is 2008 worldwide, 32% is 2013 for US only. I do not have a reference available with current worldwide values. The US data is from a government report that is updated annually, so it is easy to keep the pie-chart updated. If you have ideas for emphasizing or clarifying the wording, please leave me a note and I can insert it in the article or help clean up English details.

The reason you cannot currently edit that article is because it is "

protected" from edits by new editors. It was a popular target for vandalism:( After a certain number of days and making a certain number edits, you will automatically get the ability to edit many of the pages that are protected in this manner. DMacks (talk

) 08:21, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

You reverted 2 edits in the page Oommen Chandy. No content is added in the page but the category of Indian Christians is added. Is it necessary to give additional reference to add a category if there isn't any doubt. The person referred to in the article belongs to India and is a christian. Please explain your reverts - Rameshnta909 (talk) 19:12, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

• Oommen Chandy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

I do not see the word "Christian" anywhere in the article, nor any discussion of his religion in general (but it might be buried in other text that I am not noticing?). It is absolutely necessary to have a cite (per

WP:BLPCAT (part of that policy) is very clear: "Categories regarding religious beliefs or sexual orientation should not be used unless the subject has publicly self-identified with the belief or orientation in question, and the subject's beliefs or sexual orientation are relevant to their public life or notability, according to reliable published sources." DMacks (talk

) 19:21, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

It's been >6 hours now and you have not given a cite even after I explained the policy, so I have again removed this cat. The

WP:BURDEN is on you to provide a cite if you wish to re-add it. DMacks (talk

) 02:23, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Here is the source for you. Don't revert again. http://www.veethi.com/india-people/oommen_chandy-profile-326-19.htm - Rameshnta909 (talk) 06:13, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

I'm glad it was so easy for you to follow our policies. DMacks (talk) 06:20, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

No. I personally don't really care (cites on my talkpage don't help other readers, which is the whole point of the very serious

WP:BLPN if you are unclear on the policy (or I can ask there getting additional input on whether your material is allowed). Let me know how you wish to proceed. DMacks (talk

) 06:21, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Added info in the article with above mentioned source - Rameshnta909 (talk) 06:42, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I am writing to ask for help on our Siberian Tiger article. 3 accounts, one registered and 2 IP addresses (one IP editor appears to relate to the registered one as they talked about the same Asian elephant article unrelated to Siberian tigers), continued to change the article to give readers a false impression that bears usually dominate tigers by selectively substituting or omitting the adverbs of frequency of occurrence and removing certain adjectives that define the conditions of the animals (e.g. age) from the sources. So common incidents became rare, rare incidents became common and incidents that have never happened appear to have happened after their problematic edits. Almost all existing sources in that article said otherwise (see talk). Also they gave undue weight to unimportant exceptional information about bears in the article. I raised that in talk but they don't listen. I just reached 3RR so would you please look into the issue and if possible put a semi-protection on it? I am one of the major contributors that work collaboratively to bring our tiger article into GA standard. Thanks! BigCat82 (talk) 23:22, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

You have continued to revert edits on Monty Mason's page. The edits describing his family are completely accurate and can stay on the page. Please see his personal biographies on his own website or other newspaper articles to verify. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Username1609 (talk • contribs) 14:04, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Responded on User talk:Username1609 (note, User:DelMMason also involved). DMacks (talk) 17:19, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Sorry I am new to wikipedia and did not realise I had changed the article. I am just trying to work out how to edit and how wikipedia works.The Cheeky Little Blighter (talk) 19:24, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

I suggest that

Yes, almost certainly is the same user. I have to run for a few hr; let me know if RFPP doesn't get around to handling it or other users are involved (I don't know anything of the history of this topic and editors). DMacks (talk) 21:14, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Unfortunately, it was declined at

WP:RFPP

. In case you would like to know the real history of this topic, then please read the following discussions:

• Talk:Charles J. Chaput#The info box.
• Talk:Samuel J. Aquila#Appointment to new diocese
• Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Catholicism/Archive_2012#Episcopal appointments and WP:CRYSTAL
• Talk:Salvatore J. Cordileone#Bishop of Oakland until his installation date
• Talk:Mario Poli#Catholic bishops do not change their see until installation

It really is an intractable problem because the disruption is spread among lots of one-time-only editors and IPs. Elizium23 (talk) 23:30, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

DMacks,

I was surprised to see you removed the reference to Volunteer Litter pickup in George Bush Park. This is not a promotion, my family adopted the buffalo bayou waterway in Bush Park over 4 years ago and are partnered with Harris County Commissioner Precinct 3 who maintains the park. We are the only entity performing clean-ups in this park and any interested individual or civic organization are referred directly to us by the Commissioner's office. This is hardly "soapboxing" or "selling" vs. objective fact.

Sincerely, Carl Lazear Katy, TX — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cjlazear (talk • contribs) 01:57, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

PS - you can call the Harris County Commissioner's office to confirm our agreement:

Steve Dorman Parks Superintendent Harris County Precinct 3 3535 War Memorial Dr. Houston, TX 77084 (281) 531-1592 Fax: (281) 870-9716 Web: www.pct3.hctx.net — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cjlazear (talk • contribs) 02:02, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

The content you wrote was highly promotional in tone (wording to entice readers to visit your website or join your group), not appropriate for a formal and neutral encyclopedia. Having a

conflict of interest or other intimate relationship with a group sometimes makes it hard to take a step back and see these sorts of problems. DMacks (talk

) 02:34, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Hmm, was thinking about the similar content I (and another editor) removed from

WP:UNDUE...aren't there many groups that use and/or work on such a large park?). For example, the other group that is explicitly discussed includes mention of winning awards. Are there awards or major news stories about your group's work? DMacks (talk

) 02:43, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

At Wikiproject Chemistry and at Secosteroid Talk. Thank you for your input. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 07:00, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

In my view, if someone posting the winner of a song contest early makes you think a semi-legal threat is appropriate, there is no reason you should be allowed anywhere near articles like where that editor was going. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:38, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

As I said, I did not look back into history (except to see no previous blocks), and that when I did I supported your action. DMacks (talk) 07:47, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

I saw that. I was more amused at the vitriol over something so different than the articles being discussed. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 09:02, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Indeed:) Well, onward with mops raised high, as usual. DMacks (talk) 13:48, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Greetings!

Sorry for the last minute update, but our friends at the DC Historical Society have scheduled a Battle of Fort Stevens Edit-a-Thon to commemorate the 150th anniversary of the Civil War battle fought in the District. The event will last from noon to 2 PM on Wednesday, July 30. Hope you can make it!

Best,

James Hare

(To unsubscribe, remove your username here.) 21:16, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

I did some further research on this, but still have a question. Any chance you might be able to answer it? (It's under the same header for July 17.) Double sharp (talk) 13:54, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay, just getting back from vacation. I don't actually know anything further about this topic:( DMacks (talk) 20:16, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Greetings DMacks,

I'm new to Wikipedia. I have edited many articles and I have recently created 3 articles

When you click on those red links, is there a message explaining why it was deleted? Are there any notes on your user talkpage related to those articles? DMacks (talk) 16:41, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

I'm just copying below what i got when i checked for Naga Shourya.

"This page has been deleted. The deletion and move log for the page are provided below for reference.
   16:09, 27 July 2014 DMacks (talk | contribs) deleted page Naga Shourya (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement: duplicate-detector noted problems all still present (note removed by creator without fixing them))"

--Limelight753 (talk) 16:44, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

That seems extremely clearly explained. Copyright infringement. DMacks (talk) 20:28, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

What do I do now if I want to regain it.!?--Limelight753 (talk) 05:22, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

You cannot. Copyright infringement is absolutely forbidden. It is not allowed in an article. And it is not allowed as a starting-point for on-wiki editing from which one might change a few words here and there (a "derivative work" is generally as much an infringement as the exact original, and the original would still exist even if not readily visible). You are welcome to write a noninfringing article from scratch. DMacks (talk) 07:39, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

I know every thing you tell me about sory i can't speak english in a good manar because i am an arabic man but i do that manner of edits because when i use wikidata in mobile version the pages seems to be unconnected whith other languages although it is connected in disktop version but when i do the edits you ask me not to do it it apear to be Connected even in mobile version so that is the reason because all my edits are from mobile version and i am editor in arabic wikipedia and rollbacker so i know what you try to say.finally;thank you---

As far as most of us know, non-human animals don't seem to have spiritual lives, however many if not most humans are concious of a spiritual aspect to their lives. If I say "man is no more than an animal" then I think I am saying, I am not concious of the spiritual aspect of my life: in which case why even mention Spirituality under the heading of Naturist Ideals. If however I say "man is more than an animal" then I am saying humans do lead spiritual lives (unlike animals which as I said are not spiritual as far as we can tell). As wikipedians we should not be offering our own opinions on these matters, so it would be better is we could quote a source for these Naturist Ideals Wayne Jayes (talk) 20:31, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Indeed, that cite-needed statement could surely be removed per

WP:NOR). Yes, removal is best... DMacks (talk

) 20:43, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

The lack of Thiocyanate in the human metabolic system results in Cystic Fibrosis! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.1.190.51 (talk) 02:03, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

I'm completely comfortable promoting

WP:FRINGE. DMacks (talk

) 03:11, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Something gone wrong with your edit here Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 22:14, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Wacky! Probably cut'n'paste goof while recovering from edit-conflict. All fixed, thanks for the heads-up. DMacks (talk) 00:30, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello DMacks,

I am a representative of OxNotes (a student run website and soon to be textbook) , I apologise for method in which it was recently added to the Wikipedia page, I have ensured all 'marketing speak' has been removed and what is left is only factual information. Please feel free to contact me via LinkedIn, Twitter or email [email protected] if you require any further information. Thank you.

Kind Regards

Kazim

Kazim Chaudri Editor: OxNotes by Fluxty (Non-Profit) www.linkedin.com/in/kazimchaudri

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kazim5294 (talk • contribs) 22:24, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

hello sir please protect my account

 Done DMacks (talk) 08:11, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

	The No Spam Barnstar
	Thanks for fighting Spam links and users too Talk ) 17:20, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

I was not attempting to vandalize the page. I wanted to clarify a common misconception concerning the hybridization of the cyclopropane carbons. The wikipedia article (as well as many things you find on the internet) would suggest that the hybridization is sp3, but due to the dramatic shift in bond angle and increase ring strain, you in all actually have a far higher contribution from the p orbitals, which the article somewhat vaguely alluded to. I added much more detailed reference to the structure and bonding of cyclopropane. The actual hybridization is sp5 (the ratio of s and p character) which can be determined by examine the coupling constants, and I further added a reference to Evan's physical organic chemistry slides that discusses this. I hope this clears everything up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.164.73.109 (talk) 01:13, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Yes indeed. The "fact" is surely not normal sp3 (despite 4 bonds), but as you note the common internet (and many textbook) description is not sp5 (a very unusual hybridization). So it's critical that there be a strong source cited for it. DMacks (talk) 02:33, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

07:43, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

07:17, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

The merge proposal for the Gattermann reaction has been running for nearly 30 days now. I believe it can be acted on after that about of time - although only you and I have voted on it. Shall I merge the pages? Or would you rather I flag this on ProjectChem to see if we can find any more opinions? Project Osprey (talk) 12:55, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

I am new to Wikipedia in terms of making contributions so maybe I am missing something but I do not see how my contributions could be considered to be spam. My images of Belle Haven and the Belle Haven Club are unique and provide unique insight of the Belle Haven neighborhood of Greenwich. Can you tell me why you consider them to be spam? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Photoeditor321 (talk • contribs) 16:15, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

If you have high quality images you have taken yourself, wikipedia would love to incorporate them! You could upload them to "

WP:EL guideline recommends including only those links that are unique or highly valuable content, or ordinary where that content by its nature could not be on the wiki article- or media-sites themselves. DMacks (talk

) 16:23, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

I was not trying to create links to my site; I only wanted to share the pictures (which are mine) and as a new user with no editing history I was not allowed to upload files onto Wiki so the only way I could share was with a link.Photoeditor321 (talk) 16:33, 21 August 2014 (UTC)photoeditor321

FYI: NYDailyNews, specifically this image. Only mentioning it in case your ears start burning. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:30, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

w00t:/ Thanks for the heads-up. DMacks (talk) 03:17, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

09:21, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for writing about this sort of topic! According to the chemistry set article, there were two different(?) companies with similar names ("Thomas Salter Science" and "Salters Science"). Do you know the relationship or timeline of them (was it one company that changed its name, or two chosen similar in order to compete, or...)? DMacks (talk) 07:22, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank you! I had two chemistry sets from Salter Science, so I thought they deserved a page of their own on Wikipedia. Thousands of kids must have had these. I'm not sure if it's okay to link to external images on a talk page, but I'll take the chance; my first chemistry set looked like this: [28] on the outside, and like this: [29] on the inside; it was bought in Hamley's in London. Notice that the set is marked "Salter Science", but the chemicals are labeled "thomas salter science". I therefore assumed the company just changed their name. If you google, sets marked "thomas salter science" or "thomas salter toys" are generally electricity or magnetism kits. My second kit was much larger, called "Chemistry 4", bought in 1984, still marked "Salter Science" on the box and the manual, but the chemicals were still marked "thomas salter science".Oz1sej (talk) 10:49, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Look, please don't change TW's main page. First TW's is actor first and director and film producer. What is your issue? Sincerely, RR

What is the basis for your opinion that he is actor first in terms of our encyclopedia? DMacks (talk) 21:52, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

"Commonwealth of Kentucky" is indeed a common way to refer to the state when referring to it the first time in an article. Referring to it as a state later in the article would be fine. Your edit was basically on the level of something unnecessary and quasi-cosmetic on top of all this. The state is a Commonwealth. Articles should be educative.

The context is the chartering, which is a government act. It's true that Kentucky is formally named as a Commonwealth (U.S. state), but here it seems to be more relevant to identify its role (the state government) rather than just the name of the state whose government is acting ("The term has no particular significance in its meaning"). My edit was initially part of a bunch of undoings of various disruptive (to various levels) changes by a certain editor. If we're going to be educative, then using an unlinked term such as Commonwealth is not helpful, and readers might even think of Commonwealth (U.S. insular area), which is definitely incorrect. DMacks (talk) 16:59, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

I saw that you edited Irv Williams and thought you would be interested to know that, after the passing of Lionel Ferbos at 103, I believe Irv may be oldest living jazz musican. 66.87.73.135 (talk) 22:00, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Interesting factoid! Hard to document well enough I think, but I do like that our article highlights his substantial work continuing well into his later years. DMacks (talk) 17:18, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for reverting edits made by a sockpuppet. Said sock was thanking me for reverting its edits, so it is pleasant to have it blocked indefinitely. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 19:11, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

You're welcome! Glad we got it all resolved. DMacks (talk) 19:14, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

I just spent five minutes trying to find out about the block, didn't think it might be vandalism.Waacstats (talk) 07:43, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Tis the nature of the vandal to vandalize and waste our time:( Happy editing going forward! DMacks (talk) 07:45, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

07:49, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

My latest notification says that you reverted my last edit to this file. I requested a rename and you renamed it. I also made a slight adjustment to the description which is still as I left it, so can you please tell me exactly what it is that you have reverted. Jodosma (talk) 12:37, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

I removed the tag requesting the rename, prefacing that edit-summary with the statement "renamed". That is, I renamed it and removed the tag in a way that alerted you to the fact that something had happened in response to your edit. DMacks (talk) 13:30, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. I seem to learn something new every day at Wikipedia. ciao. Jodosma (talk) 08:31, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Come one and come all. To a presentation at the Laurel Historical Society about how you can help verify, validate, and edit the information that is on the front line of local history.

• Show the Internet who is the better editor.
• Be the creator of culture that you know you are.
• Spread the knowledge of noteworthy people who no one but you cares about.
• Lead the charge to a better Wikipedia --- eventually.

Geraldshields11 (talk) 02:08, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

See you at the Laurel Pool Room, 9th and Main Street, Laurel, MD on Thursday, September 11, 2014 at 7:00 PM EST. See http://www.meetup.com/Wikimedia-DC/events/205494212/ for more information. Geraldshields11 (talk) 02:13, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

The WikiSalon is a special meetup usually held during the first and third full weeks of every month, from 7 PM to 9 PM. It's an informal gathering of Wikimedia enthusiasts, who come together to discuss Wikimedia wikis and collaboratively edit. There's no set agenda, and guests are welcome to recommend articles for the group to edit or edit on their own.

If you're coming by Metro, the closest station is Dupont Circle (on the Red Line). If you're driving, a lot of parking opens up downtown after 6:30 PM, so finding a parking space (even a free one) should be easy. Once you've found the building, go to Cove on the second floor. We will be in the conference room.

When: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 at 7:00 PM to 9:00 PM

Where: The Cove, Dupont Circle, 1730 Connecticut Avenue NW, 2nd floor, 20009, DC

For more information, see http://www.meetup.com/Wikimedia-DC/events/205500822/

My best regards, Geraldshields11 (talk) 02:25, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Wikimedia DC's Upcoming meetups

• Thursday, September 11: “Wikipedia and YOUR History: Taking Control of the Internet, One Article at a Time!”

  A presentation at the Laurel Historical Society about how you can help verify, validate, and edit the information that is on the front line of local history. Laurel Pool Room, 9th and Main Street in Laurel, MD. 7 PM.

• Wednesday, September 17: WikiSalon

  Come for the pizza, stay for the conversation. 7 PM – 9 PM

• Saturday, September 20: September Meetup

  Get dinner and drinks with fellow Wikipedians! 6 PM

• Sunday, September 21: Laurel History Edit-a-Thon

  Local history for Wikipedia! 10:15 AM – 4 PM

• Saturday, September 27 – Sunday, September 28: Please RSVP for the Open Government WikiHack at Eventbrite by clicking on the link. The National Archives and Records Administration and Wikimedia DC are teaming up to come up with solutions that help integrate government data into Wikipedia. 10:30 AM – 5 PM each day

My best regards, Geraldshields11 (talk) 22:49, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Extend PC time? --George Ho (talk) 02:47, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

+3 months. Thanks for keeping track of these! DMacks (talk) 03:30, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

09:33, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

I'm trying to update the facts that were announced yesterday, that RR Donnelley sold Press+ to Piano Media. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.103.89.30 (talk) 08:41, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Please write it strictly neutrally--facts can be stated and updated without making it sound like a promotional/marketing piece. For example, do not use buzzwords or PR terms. Be sure facts are cited. Do not remove negative content that is cited (again, we are not allowed to give a biased or solely positive spin on topics here). DMacks (talk) 08:45, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello sir

 Iam 
Ghosal
 I Request you to please semi-protect my user page

(

08:34, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

09:05, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Extend PC time? --George Ho (talk) 23:21, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

 Done +6 months. DMacks (talk) 16:45, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

09:44, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello DMacks, I added a cite about. "Coming of Age," a short story I wrote about my grandmother's experiences on the day of the fire. Did you delete it? Lorine Kritzer Pergament (E-Mail removed for security purposes)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lorine Kritzer Pergament (talk • contribs) 20:27, 29 September 2014‎ (UTC)

We're talking about:

• Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

The "history" link lets you see exactly who made what changes (and including their [[WP:ES|edit summary}} if they left one). I stand by my removal based on my explanation of "No evidence of notability of the story or author (nothing bluelinked). See also

WP:POPCULTURE." Many people were impacted by that event and have stories to tell (and many others are interested in the event and re-telling those stories). But wikipedia is not a directory of that sort of thing, or a pile of everything ever written related to a topic. One standard filter for inclusion is the idea of "notability"--as POPCULTURE mentions, something about the impact or other aspect of it as reported by other publications (secondary sources, not just the primary source of the work itself). The other entries there all appear to have wikipedia articles about the works themselves or at least their writers, which supports the notability (non-notable topics are not viable articles themselves). I didn't see such a link available for your entry. Merely being published does not make something or someone notable unless others have written substantively about it (for example, an in-depth review of a piece of literature in a literary-criticism journal). DMacks (talk

) 21:57, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

        I Am User:Sherya ghosal. I Request You To Semi-Protect my User page 
S.C.Williams
 NOT A FULL PROTECTION

 Done. DMacks (talk) 16:32, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

I highly disagree with you reverting my edits on the Fluorescent Bulbs page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cdot25 (talk • contribs) 03:54, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

You removed an image of the temperature of the bulb when making edits commenting on the temperature of the bulb. That seems opposite the idea of giving a comprehensive discussion of temperature ideas. The comment you added is not supported by a citation (

WP:V policy). And the content is not obvious or well-supported by the other article content: the image has many areas in the 200°F vicinity, which does not seem cool, and it's not much if any cooler than much of the similar image in the Incandescent light bulb article. Instead, the article talks about how fluorescents do get hot (and how that's a problem for them), and LED lamps are at least as cool, so fluorescents are not more cool than most others. DMacks (talk

) 05:04, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello, fellow Wikipedian!

I am excited to announce our upcoming Annual Meeting at the National Archives! We'll have free lunch, an introduction by Archivist of the United States David Ferriero, and a discussion featuring Ed Summers, the creator of CongressEdits. Join your fellow DC-area Wikipedians on Saturday, October 18 from 12 to 4:30 PM. RSVP today!

Also coming up we have the Human Origins edit-a-thon on October 17 and the WikiSalon on October 22. Hope to see you at our upcoming events!

Best,

James Hare

(To unsubscribe, remove your username here.) 21:20, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

06:10, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Grup de Folk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Catalan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Every one of his edits appears to be pov.

Seeing how you're a chemist that has a superior chemistry knowledge to me I was hoping for your help on the chirality of File:S-fluoxetine-3D-balls.png. I was wondering if the phenyl ring has a higher priority than the ethyl(methyl)amine substituent according to the CIP rules. I think it does because on the carbon directly bonded to the chiral carbon, for the phenyl group it is bonded to carbons three times (counting twice for the single double bond connected to it as part of the phenyl ring) whereas on the ethyl(methyl)amine substituent it is joined to carbon once (which is the next carbon in this chain) and hydrogen twice. I ask because if this is true one would find that this molecule is in fact right-handed i.e., (R)-fluoxetine, not (S)-fluoxetine. Brenton (contribs · email · talk · uploads) 12:11, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) The phenyl group will have a higher priority than CH₂-CH₂-NH-CH₃ and so I agree that the image is the (R)-isomer. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:27, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi DMacks,

Thank you for your direction to the conflict of interest and WP:Paid pages. I am being quite transparent about the fact I work for the company that Alon Shtruzman works for (hence offering my email address) so in that sense I am disclosing my "conflict of interest" to you. I would like there to be factual piece of information about the exec in question added to the site. I am more than happy for you to work on our proposed text so that it meets with your requirements in terms of impartiality. I can also provide back up information to prove any claims made within it, which mostly relate to Alon's career history.

Please can we have a dialogue about this and find a solution?

Thanks Laura

81.140.40.25 (talk) 10:09, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, I have no interest in this topic. DMacks (talk) 16:19, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi DMacks,

I published an article "PDF file writer c# library" on Code Project website. The code is open source and it is totally free. It was published on April 1 2013. It won "Best overall article of April 2013" and "Best C# article of April 2013". It is rated 4.96 out of 5 by 202 members. It was viewed 250,000 times. The code was downloaded 45,000 times. You can view it here.

I want to add it to "List of PDF Software", section Microsoft Windows, and subsection Development libraries on Wikipedia.

I tried three times yesterday without success. You block my account. I want to do it right this time.

Looking at other entries in this article they all consists of a link to an existing Wikipedia page about the product, a description and a reference. I think that my problem is that I do not have yet an entry in Wikipedia for my program. I wrote one but it will take more than a month to review. I cannot imagine that the description or the reference is the problem.

Can I make an entry in the List of PDF software without an article in Wikipedia?

Is there another reason why my entry was rejected?

Can you give me some guidance?

Thanks, Uzi Granot UGranot (talk) 18:52, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

The entry on the List article was rejected solely because it does not have an actual Wikipedia article at this time (that's the policy/scope of that page). And you were blocked because you were

enthusiasm for your project), it would be a viable link. DMacks (talk

) 16:22, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

I'm sorry you feel the link is spam. Wikipedia is a collection of facts and links to related content should be included. Preventing access to free energy and HHO research will not stop it from getting to the public, rather it will serve to speed up the desire to obtain information about this new technology. All funds from the website listed go into Stan Meyer research, it is not a spam link and directly relates to the Stan Meyer fuel cell. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Waterpros (talk • contribs) 04:02, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Nope, it's pretty much a spam link. Please go peddle your wares somewhere else. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 04:11, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

It sounds like the best thing Wikipedia can do from your perspective is to avoid linking it. Happy to oblige. DMacks (talk) 04:16, 11 October 2014 (UTC)