User talk:Daddyson11111

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:46, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently made edits related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans. This is a standard message to inform you that Eastern Europe or the Balkans is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:47, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'd suggest you to self-revert, especially if you don't wanna end up getting blocked for edit warring. It was discussed on the talk page, but no consensus was reached. So you should make your case on the talk page. StephenMacky1 (talk) 21:16, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:23, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

While you indicated a prior discussion in your edit summary, the discussion in question was over a year old and concerned the inclusion of, specifically, Al-Qaeda, not "mujahideen". Further discussion was resumed there today by Kluche, who made an argument for the inclusion of mujahideen. Once your block expires, you are encouraged to make a case on the talk page for removing Mujahideen from the infobox. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:26, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the

]

Your submission at

Ambush near Kosovska Mitrovica

(April 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth
  (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent
  of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Agree with previous reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Ambush near Kosovska Mitrovica
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 04:21, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Edison18273! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! asilvering (talk) 04:21, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ambush near Kosovska Mitrovica

moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to

general notability

, and was declined by a reviewer.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:10, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Edison18273,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Battle of Lojane for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Battle of Lojane to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 03:40, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Serb tradhtar, legen, pse punon per interesa te serbve o ropsh Illyrianzz (talk) 21:10, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pse heq armatimet moderne te kosoves o cuni i babes? e ke bo babin tat me i ardh turp si tka bir Illyrianzz (talk) 16:32, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sepse nuk ka burim. a e dini si funksionon wikipedia ? Wikipedia nuk eshte tiktok. Daddyson11111 (talk) 18:22, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Daddyson11111. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:51, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vratnica attack, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vratnica attack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]