User talk:Darthfyer86

Welcome!

Hello, Darthfyer86, and

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

]

The Original Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		I, W-League 2008-09 related articles. Frankie goh (talk) 05:31, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply ]

The article Caitlin Foord has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable footballer who fails

WP:ATHLETE

. Possibly recreate when made professional debut?

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Brooke Starrett. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:11, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Rettetast (talk) 09:51, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I was wondering if I would be able to request a lineup image for the 2009 A-League Grand Final as you seem to be very good at them and I'm not sure how to go about creating one. Thanks, timsdad ^(talk) 11:26, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Newcastle United Jets FC W-League managers has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 14:41, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WNBL 2009-10 Position Ladder has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:54, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ashleigh Connor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Never made her pro debut, failing

WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 00:30, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ashleigh Connor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashleigh Connor until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. GiantSnowman 13:11, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

]

Proposed deletion of Hayley Abbott

The article Hayley Abbott has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this footballer meets

WP:GNG

or has played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C679 17:41, 19 March 2016 (UTC) {{subst:prodwarning|1=Jodie Bain|concern=Doesn't satisfy

Template:Central Coast Mariners FC W-League squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. SuperJew (talk) 07:10, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Central Coast Mariners FC W-League head coaches has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. SuperJew (talk) 07:11, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WNBL Ladder has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 15:28, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:A-League confirmed expansion map has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 15:00, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jodie Bain has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails

WP:NSPORTS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hack (talk) 08:38, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:W-League club has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:02, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Brooke Starrett has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about non-notable semi-pro footballer

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 13:59, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kathryn Pryer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathryn Pryer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joeykai (talk) 13:44, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Britt Simmons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Britt Simmons until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joeykai (talk) 19:39, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jodie Bain has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails

WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 08:08, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jodie Bain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jodie Bain until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 16:58, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Katie Daly has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

comprehensively fails

WP:GNG

and any relevant SNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 08:21, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lisa Hartley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Hartley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 19:19, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emma Stewart is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emma Stewart until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 14:33, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emma-Kate Dewhurst is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emma-Kate Dewhurst until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 14:14, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stephanie Haim is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Haim until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone 22:55, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Stephen Roche (coach) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails

WP:BEFORE

search revealed routine news of him being appointed as coach for the two teams that he coached but no significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 23:19, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stephen Roche (coach) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Roche (coach) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:59, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]