User talk:Dave Truesdale

Hello, Dave Truesdale, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 15:38, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bryant Villeponteau-2014.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nick⁠—⁠^Contact/_Contribs 19:04, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dave Truesdale. You have new messages at NickW557's talk page.
Message added 22:37, 15 June 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Nick⁠—⁠^Contact/_Contribs 22:37, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

Draft:Bryant Villeponteau. Thanks! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 14:58, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello! Dave Truesdale, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 21:04, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The wiki article on Sam Moskowitz (SF author and historian) uses a photo of mine without consent or attribution. I would like it removed until I am contacted for possible use. The photo was taken at MidAmericon, the 34th World Science Fiction Convention, Sept. 2-6, 1976, in Kansas City, MO. Here's the link to the Moskowitz wiki page:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sam_Moskowitz

Dave Truesdale has edited Tangent and now Tangent Online since 1993. It has been nominated for the Hugo Award five times and the World Fantasy Award once. A former editor of the Bulletin of the Science Fiction & Fantasy Writers of America, he also served as a World Fantasy Award judge in 1998, and for several years wrote an original online column for The Magazine of Fantasy & Science Fiction. Now retired, he keeps close company with his SF/F library, the coffeepot, and old movie channels on TV. He lives in Kansas City, MO. Dave Truesdale (talk) 19:26, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

I see you have been adding Gregory Benford to cities and lists, stating that he has lived there. This may be so, but his article does not indicate that. Please add a reliable source before adding Benford back to these lists. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:34, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Gregory Benford. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:50, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• You stated here that you are editing on behalf Gregory Benford. I would strongly urge you to carefully read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:54, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Magnolia667, I'm new at this and am trying to do the right thing. Gregory Benford sends me material from time to time and asks me to add it to his wiki page. After you asked for sources when I added his name to a few cities' wiki pages, Greg sent me a paragraph detailing when and for how long he lived in these cities. I added this graph to his wiki page under Biography, then linked the cities to the wiki pages of those cities. I thought I was doing the right thing, so am sorry if I missed something. I also do not understand why me helping Greg (who is extremely busy) maintain his wiki page is in any way a conflict of interest. Is Greg the only person who is able to add stuff to his own wiki page? Just asking. Thank you. Dave Truesdale (talk) 00:26, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you read the conflict of interest, you will see that only neutral editors can edit his page. He is not a neutral editor, and because your are a friend or he is paying you, you aren't either. There are some workarounds, which are outlined on the C of I article. Also, you added information but did not add a source to support it. Wikipedia does not accept personal knowledge, it needs a reliable source. Please take a moment to read some of the help pages, or leave a message here and I will try to help. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:37, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning Magnolia677, I read the C of I article and am still unclear on some of it. Gregory does not pay me to add a few items of fact to his page on occasion. While I obviously know Gregory (we've met but once, back in 2001 at a sci-fi convention) I would consider us friendly acquaintances at best. _Lots_ of sci-fi fans know Gregory, as he is well known and highly respected in the sci-fi community, and has been since the 1980s. I think he asked me to help with his wiki page because he knew of my sci-fi fanzine and liked it and knew he could trust me, but this is only a guess. When someone as high profile and respected as Gregory Benford asks if you would help with his wiki page because he is too busy (world traveler, lecturer on sci-fi and astrophysics), then a mere sci-fi fan would be crazy to say no. Gregory has asked only that I add factual material to his page, such as in the recent paragraph he wrote and I merely pasted in and linked; where he was born, raised, or has lived during his lifetime. If Gregory cannot add facts about his own life, then who can? Does he need to go back through his life and get civil records for proof of where he has lived, or was born, or where he got his doctorate in astrophysics? This is where my confusion comes in about some of the C of I rules. I can see why they are needed, but they are so complex in places that now a notable person cannot even edit his own page with factual material. This is kind of a Catch-22 situation, isn't it? Is a total stranger the only one able to edit someone else's page -- and where would they go to acquire factual material if not the source, in this case the person whose page it is? All Gregory wants me to do (and again he has written the text) is add his name as a Notable Person to the pages on Orange County, Robertsdale and Fairhope, Alabama, and Laguna Beach, CA. Since I am quite new at this, I ask your help in exactly how I should go about adding a single paragraph from Gregory (to his own page) verifying the cities and dates where and when he lived (or still lives) at these places, and linking to their individual pages at their Notable Persons sections. Thanks very much for your help. :-)Dave Truesdale (talk) 14:31, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Again, you clearly have a conflict of interest. The real test is, if this person was charged with a crime tomorrow, would you add that to his page with a reliable source? Not likely, because he is your friend. Thus, the neutrality of your edits are dubious. A workaround is to declare your conflict, as you've done, and post any edits you want to make to the article's talk page. Other neutral edits may wish to add some or all of your edit to the article. Please carefully read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 01:22, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dave Truesdale. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Karl P. Cohen.jpg, which you've attributed to Elisabeth Cohen Brown. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the
  CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
  ) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
  OTRS pending
  }} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:34, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Diannaa, I have since obtained proper permission and confirmation of copyright to add the Karl P. Cohen photo. I copy the confirmation email here: "Permissions <[email protected]>

Jun 8 (1 day ago)

to embenford, me, xbenford, beacashmore Dear Elisabeth Brown,

Thank you, what you say confirms that – whether by inheritance or as creator – you are the copyright owner.

Has the photograph been uploaded? If so, under what name? If not, please upload it to Wikimedia Commons (<https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:UploadWizard>), and let me know once you have done so.

Thank you for your contributions to our project.

Yours sincerely, Martin Fisher"

I now need to know if the photo will be automatically posted or if there is anything else I need to do (I am still very new at this). I have taken the liberty of uploading the photo again but can't seem to get it to appear on the Karl P. Cohen wiki page in progress. Thank you in advance for your help and understanding. Dave Truesdale (talk) 15:07, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission does not appear to be written in

peacock terms

that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Portions of this draft need to be rewritten in a formal neutral encyclopedic tone rather than the informal breezy tone here. This draft has

external links

in the article body.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Karl P. Cohen
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:40, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Dave Truesdale, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:40, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was:

Please turn the

WP:REFB

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Karl P. Cohen
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DrStrauss talk 10:50, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dave Truesdale. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dave Truesdale. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dave Truesdale. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:18, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]