User talk:Dcabrilo
You can check the archives here
|
---|
Please read this before posting, as I am an inactive contributor and hardly ever read my talk page:
|
Invitation
Hello! I invite you to join the WikiProject Serbia. All the best, --serbiana - talk 02:33, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
AZERTY
Haha, yeah -- I can type properly on it, but it pretty much halves my typing rae and doubles my error rate -- so for the edit summary i didnt bother :) At the moment Im just bumming around the flat of the HC girl Im staying with, but in an hour or so Im going to
Good work!
The Barnstar of Rescue | ||
For an excellent job on saving El kondor pada from a sorry fate.
|
You managed to keep your cool on a very heated subject, write well, argue persuasively, and most importantly, did an excellent job of researching over several days. Well done. (I just got one of these things a few days ago, which is what gave me the idea; I hope you like it as much as I liked getting mine.) AnonEMouse 16:32, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
Glas
Ajd molim te glasaj ovdje [[1]] gusto je. Unaprijed ti zahvaljujem. Pozdrav! Luka Jačov 10:21, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
Pretenders Ernst August
Please see Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (names and titles)#Ernest Aug. and constibute to the discussion there. I look forward to people assessing UE:should English be used in all these cases and how; would any sort of numeral be acceptable; what are the correct ordinals anyway; and Is there any other sustainable way to disambiguate these systematically. Shilkanni 11:16, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Death threat
Please translate the death threat (made against you and now removed) for me so I know the meaning. I need that before I can deal with it. FearÉIREANN\(caint) 00:46, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
- Making a death threat is a serious matter on WP. It earns an automatic permanent ban. But to place such a ban I need to know what the death threat was. Was it ambiguous or clearcut? Was it specific or general? The user has made other comments on user talk pages. Could you tell me if they too were threats? Once I know what was said then I can act on it. Please let me know. FearÉIREANN\(caint) 01:00, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Ulqini/Ulqin name
- Both names are correct, in Albanian, just grammatically different. In Albanian names change when used definitive form "Ulqini", but the indefinite form is "Ulqin". Furthermore, if you would translate a label "Memory from Ulqin" the tranlation would be "Kujtim nga Ulqini" (the ablative), but when you say "I live in ulqin" you translate it "Unë jetoj në Ulqin". Hope I did not confuse you further with this explanation. Grammar in Albanian is much more complicated than the English :). 10:56, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
- you are welcome. ilir_pz 23:31, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
By the way, check here and let me know what you think. If you care to give an opinion, it is appreciated. ilir_pz 00:55, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Do not, if you think it is against the principles you posted above. Instead, it is about maintaing NPOV in the article. ilir_pz 00:56, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
CG Wikipedia
Hey Dcabrilo, there is currently a vote for a version of Wikipedia in Montenegrin. If you want to vote, go to
]Tzv. moto Srbije
Da li bi mogao da baciš pogled na članak Serbia gde neki korisnici stavljaju da je moto Srbije Samo sloga Srbina spasava? Radi se o nacionalističkoj frazi koja se pokušava progurati kao moto Srbije. Na stranici za razgovor je pokrenuta rasprava, pa bih te zamolio da daš svoj doprinos u raspravi oko dileme čije je rešenje svakako očigledno. Pozdrav. --Pockey 21:09, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Molim te pogledaj ovu sliku i njenu licenci. Onaj korisnik uporno pokušava da je diskredituje uprkos mom nastojanju da opstane. Da li bi mogao da reaguješ adekvatnim argumentima pošto moj engleski nije najbolji za takve stvari? Hvala. --Pockey 22:32, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Sad sam i ja to shvatio. Dakle, poslao sam im pismo za dozvolu. Hvala na odgovoru, pozdrav. --Pockey 18:32, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Afd Request
Hi there,
Would you mind taking a look at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bryan_Brandenburg
It needs more input from seasoned editors.
Thank you, Linux monster 00:34, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Studentski protest
I was shocked when I discovered that we didn't have an article on
- Heck; RTFM: "Do invite me to help write an article". Well, I just did :-). Duja► 10:00, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Well, you should rewrite the sentence in question to accomodate for too quick ('n'dumb) readers like myself. :-).
- Actually, I've dug up some decent sources already (in the Reference section), just, I'm to busy (and uninspired) to actually write the prose. Heck, this one almost cries for a ]
Welsh
Welsh is not an official language in the UK. English is not an official language of the UK. The UK does not have an official language. That is, there is no legislation the specifies what is and what isn't an official language. However Welsh along with, Irish Gaelic, Ulster Scots, Scots, Scottish Gaelic and Cornish are recognised as regional languages. See
Hi Dcabrilo, can you contact Koraksić again and get an explicit PD release for this image, and then forward it to [email protected]? (See
Table of parties
What has the year of their founding got to do with the article? --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 17:02, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
- A bit, yeah. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 18:53, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
- I did, and it didn't take any much work at all. :))) --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 19:01, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
- The reason why I asked in the first place is that I can't actually see the years from the politics in Serbia template to the right. :) --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 15:42, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
- I did, and it didn't take any much work at all. :))) --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 19:01, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Splitting Serbo-Croatian
Did you even read what I suggested? Of course there would remain an article about the Serbo-Croatian language, one of the official languages of former Yugoslavia. And it wouldn’t be like splitting Bosnia and Herzegovina but like splitting America into America the continent (north or south) and USA. Mrcina (talk) 09:06, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:Elektricni_orgazam.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,
Speedy deletion of Conscription in Serbia
A tag has been placed on Conscription in Serbia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the
{{hangon}}
on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk pageFor guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria
Proposed deletion of Obraz
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Obraz, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- This organisation is not a registered non-government organisation and is to be banned from public activities.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
Fair use rationale for File:Nadrealisti.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 12:14, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Novi fosili-cover.jpg
Orphaned non-free image File:Dumdum-cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "
Nomination of Edo Stojčić for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edo Stojčić is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edo Stojčić until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. GregorB (talk) 16:31, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
March 2013
Hello, I'm Dodger67. Your recent edit to the page Distance education appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Roger (talk) 21:43, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
The article Boris Mitić has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- The subject does not meet WP:BIO, and there are no previous versions of the article that could be reverted to, as most of the information is unverified
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. KJ «Click Here» 13:26, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
The file File:Dcabrilo in Denver.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused personal image. If this depicts the uploader, then someone else took the photo.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. B (talk) 21:46, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Irina Fredericks for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Irina Fredericks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irina Fredericks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Szzuk (talk) 10:30, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Mija Kulić for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mija Kulić until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.