User talk:Dinesh kanwar singh
February 2014
January 2015
Hello! One of your recent edits to
Welcome!
Hello and
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia
- Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
- Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
- Take particular care while adding biographical material about a reliable sources.
- No sock puppetry.
- If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
- Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
- Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.
The
We present content professionally
Please stop introducing the inappropriate intimate usage of people's first names in the Bigg Boss articles. We are not their besties nor intimating that we are. We use their full name the first time it appears in the article and thereafter we use their surname. See the
- Hi Dinesh, I'm an administrator at the English Wikipedia. Underscoring TRPOD's comment, your edit here was disruptive. When another editor reverts you for a legitimate reason, as was done in this case, since TheRedPenOfDoom is pointing out that articles must be presented in proper WP:BRD. Resubmitting changes per your own personal preference without consensus is disruptive. This is a community project, so the community gets to weigh in. If I were you, I'd revert your most recent edit and take it to the talk page. If you do not, you're only going to make other editors think that you're here to promote your own personal agenda, which is not the right attitude to have in a collaborative project. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:28, 29 November 2015 (UTC)]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
And you went and did it again. [1] Stop it. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:08, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia.
- AND AGAIN [2]
- STOP IT. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 01:41, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Psychonaut (talk) 09:58, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Edit warring at Bigg Boss 9
The full report is at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Dinesh kanwar singh reported by User:Psychonaut (Result: Blocked). Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 02:23, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
Bigg Boss 9
Hello Dinesh kanwar singh, I have reverted one of your edit per
January 2016
![Stop icon with clock](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/39/Stop_x_nuvola_with_clock.svg/40px-Stop_x_nuvola_with_clock.svg.png)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Katietalk 14:43, 8 January 2016 (UTC)Bigg Boss 9
Hello Dinesh kanwar singh, I reverted your edit from
February 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
March 2016
![Stop icon with clock](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/39/Stop_x_nuvola_with_clock.svg/40px-Stop_x_nuvola_with_clock.svg.png)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:18, 3 March 2016 (UTC)- I have blocked you indefinitely because I don't get the sense that you're here to contribute constructively to an academic project, rather that you're here to waste other editors' time. Your recent edits at Bigg Boss 9 were the most convincing, since you erroneously think it's your place to editorialize about "fixed & pre planned" reality show winners, and to use misogynistic language. Please find a more constructive hobby. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:36, 3 March 2016 (UTC)