Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Celjski Grad (talk) 18:51, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Doug Weller. I noticed that you recently removed content from Islamophobia without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. We go by what the sources say. And we are biased towards mainstream sources. Doug Weller talk 14:42, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Dingus1233! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Karim Ahmad Khan that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 15:32, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've reverted that because clearly they wouldn't be Democrats today, just as Wallace isn't. They were Southern Democrats and your edit hid that. Doug Weller talk 14:48, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the
Doug Weller talk 14:49, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You have recently made edits related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe. This is a standard message to inform you that the Balkans or Eastern Europe is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Doug Weller talk 14:51, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You have recently made edits related to the
Note that I reverted you at Karim Ahmad Khan because of the above. Doug Weller talk 15:41, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Do not threaten people in edit summaries. [1] O3000, Ret. (talk) 22:43, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}