User talk:Dogposter
This user may have left Wikipedia. Dogposter has not edited Wikipedia for a considerable amount of time. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Dogposter's talk page. I tend to reply on my own talk page unless asked to reply on another.
Cucurbitin Page
Hi, I just created the page cucurbitin. I didn't have enough knowledge to write a lot about, so if anyone sees this, please try to help. Dogposter (talk) 21:33, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Check out Measles vaccine
Ha ha, it's really short!
Don't make fun of articles, but yes, it is. Dogposter (talk) 22:08, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Just added stub template to Measles vaccine. Dogposter (talk) 22:18, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for the barnstar. And thanks for all your contributions to chemistry articles! -- Ed (Edgar181) 23:52, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
You're welcome. Dogposter (talk) 15:23, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Bobbins
Hi Dogposter, I hope it's okay with you, but I created another version of your Bobbins userbox. Just wanted to let you know. By the way, reply on
Barnstar: Thanks
Thank you for giving me the Barnstar! That was a surprise, and a nice one to get on my birthday!
It's a pleasure to be able to help on the Help Desk - I've not done quite as much over the last couple of weeks because of family commitments and problems with my computer!
Regards, -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 20:50, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
You're welcome. Didn't know it was your birthday. Dogposter 12:34, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Siamenoside reference
Yes I do, sorry I forgot to put it on the page. I got that from http://www.chromadex.com/chemicals/Siamenosidei_P.html.
Greetings from the MCB WikiProject!
Your rollback request
Hello Dogposter, I have granted your account rollback in accordance with your request. Please remember that rollback is for reverting vandalism/spam, and that misuse of the tool, either by revert-warring with other users, or simply reverting edits you disagree with, can lead to it being removed. For practice, you may wish to see
- You're welcome. One other thing, if you have doubts about reverting an edit, then don't use rollback to revert it: instead, you should revert it without the use of any tools, and should revert it with a typed-up reason. Happy editing. Acalamari 22:52, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Vandalism?
I'm sorry, I don't get the generic tag, but it doesn't appear to be vandalism. Lando09 (talk) 19:39, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Wait, why do you keep adding "league super" to all these tables? Are they test edits? Dogposter 19:41, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
- No they are to add the squad numbers to Super League players. European Super League players each have a squad number allocated to them each season, NRL players do not. Hence a new infobox, I don't know too much about editing the current one to allow for both to sit side by side. Lando09 (talk) 19:47, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Oh, sorry. If you want to make an infobox, start a page in the Template namespace and create one there. Dogposter 20:00, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, FYI this guy seems to be talk) 20:43, 20 September 2009 (UTC)]
Reversal
Please do not reverse edits that you disagree with, or label them vandalism. If you disagree with the edit in question, then debating the point in the talk page is the appropriate action. 204.40.1.129 (talk) 00:42, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Why? 204.40.1.129 (talk) 00:44, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Well, the other sentences in the article seem to disagree with the semi-presidential system thing you keep adding. If you support your views, discuss it on the article's talk page or something. Dogposter 00:48, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
No, the description in the rest of the article supports the categorization as semi-presidential. See the discussion page, and compare the presidential and semi-presidential systems. 204.40.1.129 (talk) 00:51, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Massacre of Monzievaird
I moved this page onto my user page and exensively reworked it and re-worded it radically. I also injected a sizable wallop of research; what now? How can I re-instate it? Thanks for help. —Preceding
You're welcome
You're welcome! LovesMacs (talk) 14:07, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Thanks a million !!!
You're so alert!!! --Ludvikus (talk) 00:16, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
You're welcome! Dogposter 00:30, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
--LAN 23:25, 22 November 2009 (UTC)== Thanks! ==
LAN 23:23, 22 November 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Qazamj (talk • contribs)
--LAN 23:25, 22 November 2009 (UTC)== Thanks! ==
LAN 23:23, 22 November 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Qazamj (talk • contribs)
--LAN 23:28, 22 November 2009 (UTC)Adopt me nao plox —Preceding unsigned comment added by Qazamj (talk • contribs) LAN 23:32, 22 November 2009 (UTC) IHAZ BEEN ADOPTED !!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Qazamj (talk • contribs)
AdoptionThis user has adopted spike35031.
If that didn't give it away I would gladly be adopted by you!
Spike35031 (talk) 04:26, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
P.S. Please respond on my talk page (user_talk:spike35031).
- Hi dogposter, I don't think I really need to be adopted anymore so I've removed the box from my page. Just thought I'd let you know.--Spike35031 (talk) 21:51, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the Adoption offerThanks for the offer, i'm very grateful you came forward to adopt me. But i've found another Indian adoptee so that the time zone will not be a problem. Thank you for your offer once again!
-
Happy Thanksgiving!
and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a turkey, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy Thanksgiving! Spread the goodness of turkey by adding {{ User:December21st2012Freak/Thanksgiving Turkey }} to their talk page with a friendly message.
|
Re
Thanks
Thank you kindly...
File:Wiki gryphon.png for gryphon topicon
Allopathy and its Difference with Modern Scientific Medicine : Request to join the discussionI came across your userpage and thought that I could try to involve you into the discussion regarding my attempts to radically modify the article on Allopathic medicine where my edit as available at this link, had been reverted. The discussion is available at the respective talk page. I had referenced my edits so that the information that might not be known to many, can be verified. I seek the improvisation of this article (along with the related ones) and would like a healthy discussion to be re-initiated in order to improve the article. I would be glad if you show your experienced intervention/involvement.
Talk 14:46, 23 December 2010 (UTC)]
Allopathy and its Difference with Modern Scientific Medicine : Request to join the discussionI came across your userpage and thought that I could try to involve you into the discussion regarding my attempts to radically modify the article on Allopathic medicine where my edit as available at this link, had been reverted. The discussion is available at the respective talk page. I had referenced my edits so that the information that might not be known to many, can be verified. I seek the improvisation of this article (along with the related ones) and would like a healthy discussion to be re-initiated in order to improve the article. I would be glad if you show your experienced intervention/involvement.
Talk 14:46, 23 December 2010 (UTC)]
Page Curation newsletter
The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!)
The Wikipedia Library (talk | edit)
Research tools and services
- Resource Exchange
- Reference Desk
- Research Desk
- Discover open access
- Free Resource Guides
- Book Sources
- Journal Sources
- Bibliographies
- Free newspaper sources
- Online archives
- Find Your Local Library tips
- Find Your Source tips
- How to find sources
- Citation tools guide
Outreach
- The Wikipedia Library Bookshelf (meta)
- Universities and Libraries
- Archivists
- Publishers
- Wikipedia Loves Libraries
- Wikidata source metadata
Get involved
- Get free access to sources
- Read the Books & Bytes newsletter
- Help disambiguate authors of scholarly papers
- Be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar
- Teach Library Interns
- Become a Coordinator
- Learn about TWL
Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization consisting of over 28,000 volunteers in more than 100 countries. The collaboration was formed to organize medical scholarship in a systematic way in the interests of evidence-based research: the group conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.
Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account. Thank you Cochrane!
If you are stil active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)
Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 19:51, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)]
ArbCom elections are now open!Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)]
WikiProject Pharmacology User Activity Update
Thank you kindly...
File:Wiki gryphon.png for gryphon topicon
Allopathy and its Difference with Modern Scientific Medicine : Request to join the discussionI came across your userpage and thought that I could try to involve you into the discussion regarding my attempts to radically modify the article on Allopathic medicine where my edit as available at this link, had been reverted. The discussion is available at the respective talk page. I had referenced my edits so that the information that might not be known to many, can be verified. I seek the improvisation of this article (along with the related ones) and would like a healthy discussion to be re-initiated in order to improve the article. I would be glad if you show your experienced intervention/involvement.
Talk 14:46, 23 December 2010 (UTC)]
Allopathy and its Difference with Modern Scientific Medicine : Request to join the discussionI came across your userpage and thought that I could try to involve you into the discussion regarding my attempts to radically modify the article on Allopathic medicine where my edit as available at this link, had been reverted. The discussion is available at the respective talk page. I had referenced my edits so that the information that might not be known to many, can be verified. I seek the improvisation of this article (along with the related ones) and would like a healthy discussion to be re-initiated in order to improve the article. I would be glad if you show your experienced intervention/involvement.
Talk 14:46, 23 December 2010 (UTC)]
Page Curation newsletter
The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!)
The Wikipedia Library (talk | edit)
Research tools and services
- Resource Exchange
- Reference Desk
- Research Desk
- Discover open access
- Free Resource Guides
- Book Sources
- Journal Sources
- Bibliographies
- Free newspaper sources
- Online archives
- Find Your Local Library tips
- Find Your Source tips
- How to find sources
- Citation tools guide
Outreach
- The Wikipedia Library Bookshelf (meta)
- Universities and Libraries
- Archivists
- Publishers
- Wikipedia Loves Libraries
- Wikidata source metadata
Get involved
- Get free access to sources
- Read the Books & Bytes newsletter
- Help disambiguate authors of scholarly papers
- Be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar
- Teach Library Interns
- Become a Coordinator
- Learn about TWL
Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization consisting of over 28,000 volunteers in more than 100 countries. The collaboration was formed to organize medical scholarship in a systematic way in the interests of evidence-based research: the group conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.
Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account. Thank you Cochrane!
If you are stil active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)
Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 19:51, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)]
ArbCom elections are now open!Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)]
WikiProject Pharmacology User Activity Update
File:Wiki gryphon.png for gryphon topicon
Allopathy and its Difference with Modern Scientific Medicine : Request to join the discussionI came across your userpage and thought that I could try to involve you into the discussion regarding my attempts to radically modify the article on Allopathic medicine where my edit as available at this link, had been reverted. The discussion is available at the respective talk page. I had referenced my edits so that the information that might not be known to many, can be verified. I seek the improvisation of this article (along with the related ones) and would like a healthy discussion to be re-initiated in order to improve the article. I would be glad if you show your experienced intervention/involvement.
Talk 14:46, 23 December 2010 (UTC)]
Allopathy and its Difference with Modern Scientific Medicine : Request to join the discussionI came across your userpage and thought that I could try to involve you into the discussion regarding my attempts to radically modify the article on Allopathic medicine where my edit as available at this link, had been reverted. The discussion is available at the respective talk page. I had referenced my edits so that the information that might not be known to many, can be verified. I seek the improvisation of this article (along with the related ones) and would like a healthy discussion to be re-initiated in order to improve the article. I would be glad if you show your experienced intervention/involvement.
Talk 14:46, 23 December 2010 (UTC)]
Page Curation newsletter
The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!)
The Wikipedia Library (talk | edit)
Research tools and services
- Resource Exchange
- Reference Desk
- Research Desk
- Discover open access
- Free Resource Guides
- Book Sources
- Journal Sources
- Bibliographies
- Free newspaper sources
- Online archives
- Find Your Local Library tips
- Find Your Source tips
- How to find sources
- Citation tools guide
Outreach
- The Wikipedia Library Bookshelf (meta)
- Universities and Libraries
- Archivists
- Publishers
- Wikipedia Loves Libraries
- Wikidata source metadata
Get involved
- Get free access to sources
- Read the Books & Bytes newsletter
- Help disambiguate authors of scholarly papers
- Be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar
- Teach Library Interns
- Become a Coordinator
- Learn about TWL
Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization consisting of over 28,000 volunteers in more than 100 countries. The collaboration was formed to organize medical scholarship in a systematic way in the interests of evidence-based research: the group conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.
Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account. Thank you Cochrane!
If you are stil active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)
Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 19:51, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)]
ArbCom elections are now open!Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)]
WikiProject Pharmacology User Activity Update
Allopathy and its Difference with Modern Scientific Medicine : Request to join the discussionI came across your userpage and thought that I could try to involve you into the discussion regarding my attempts to radically modify the article on Allopathic medicine where my edit as available at this link, had been reverted. The discussion is available at the respective talk page. I had referenced my edits so that the information that might not be known to many, can be verified. I seek the improvisation of this article (along with the related ones) and would like a healthy discussion to be re-initiated in order to improve the article. I would be glad if you show your experienced intervention/involvement.
Talk 14:46, 23 December 2010 (UTC)]
Allopathy and its Difference with Modern Scientific Medicine : Request to join the discussionI came across your userpage and thought that I could try to involve you into the discussion regarding my attempts to radically modify the article on Allopathic medicine where my edit as available at this link, had been reverted. The discussion is available at the respective talk page. I had referenced my edits so that the information that might not be known to many, can be verified. I seek the improvisation of this article (along with the related ones) and would like a healthy discussion to be re-initiated in order to improve the article. I would be glad if you show your experienced intervention/involvement.
Talk 14:46, 23 December 2010 (UTC)]
Page Curation newsletter
The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!)
The Wikipedia Library (talk | edit)
Research tools and services
- Resource Exchange
- Reference Desk
- Research Desk
- Discover open access
- Free Resource Guides
- Book Sources
- Journal Sources
- Bibliographies
- Free newspaper sources
- Online archives
- Find Your Local Library tips
- Find Your Source tips
- How to find sources
- Citation tools guide
Outreach
- The Wikipedia Library Bookshelf (meta)
- Universities and Libraries
- Archivists
- Publishers
- Wikipedia Loves Libraries
- Wikidata source metadata
Get involved
- Get free access to sources
- Read the Books & Bytes newsletter
- Help disambiguate authors of scholarly papers
- Be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar
- Teach Library Interns
- Become a Coordinator
- Learn about TWL
Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization consisting of over 28,000 volunteers in more than 100 countries. The collaboration was formed to organize medical scholarship in a systematic way in the interests of evidence-based research: the group conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.
Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account. Thank you Cochrane!
If you are stil active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)
Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 19:51, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)]
ArbCom elections are now open!Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)]
WikiProject Pharmacology User Activity Update
Allopathy and its Difference with Modern Scientific Medicine : Request to join the discussionI came across your userpage and thought that I could try to involve you into the discussion regarding my attempts to radically modify the article on Allopathic medicine where my edit as available at this link, had been reverted. The discussion is available at the respective talk page. I had referenced my edits so that the information that might not be known to many, can be verified. I seek the improvisation of this article (along with the related ones) and would like a healthy discussion to be re-initiated in order to improve the article. I would be glad if you show your experienced intervention/involvement.
Talk 14:46, 23 December 2010 (UTC)]
Page Curation newsletter
The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!)
The Wikipedia Library (talk | edit)
Research tools and services
- Resource Exchange
- Reference Desk
- Research Desk
- Discover open access
- Free Resource Guides
- Book Sources
- Journal Sources
- Bibliographies
- Free newspaper sources
- Online archives
- Find Your Local Library tips
- Find Your Source tips
- How to find sources
- Citation tools guide
Outreach
- The Wikipedia Library Bookshelf (meta)
- Universities and Libraries
- Archivists
- Publishers
- Wikipedia Loves Libraries
- Wikidata source metadata
Get involved
- Get free access to sources
- Read the Books & Bytes newsletter
- Help disambiguate authors of scholarly papers
- Be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar
- Teach Library Interns
- Become a Coordinator
- Learn about TWL
Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization consisting of over 28,000 volunteers in more than 100 countries. The collaboration was formed to organize medical scholarship in a systematic way in the interests of evidence-based research: the group conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.
Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account. Thank you Cochrane!
If you are stil active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)
Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 19:51, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)]
ArbCom elections are now open!Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)]
WikiProject Pharmacology User Activity Update
Page Curation newsletter
The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!)
The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!)
The Wikipedia Library (talk | edit) Research tools and services
Outreach
Get involved
Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization consisting of over 28,000 volunteers in more than 100 countries. The collaboration was formed to organize medical scholarship in a systematic way in the interests of evidence-based research: the group conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.
Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account. Thank you Cochrane! If you are stil active as a medical editor, come and Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 19:51, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
|