ACT! for America shows that you are currently engaged in an
edit war ; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the
talk page to work toward making a version that represents
consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See
BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant
noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution . In some cases, you may wish to request temporary
page protection .
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing —especially if you violate the three-revert rule , which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule —should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bishonen | talk 01:01, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[ reply ]
Please don't remove well-sourcecd content from articles without an explanation, as you did at
]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard
to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Dexusminus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion , because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion , such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable .
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines . If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator . Kb03 (talk ) 06:13, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading File:Dexusminus-PFP.jpg . You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link , then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions .
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk ) 08:30, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[ reply ]
An article you recently created,
talk ) 11:12, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
[ reply ]
chatter ) 16:26, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot . I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bass pro shops the hunt controversy , a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request
Userfication
of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at
WP:REFUND/G13
.
Thank you for your attention.
talk) 01:38, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Hello, Doughybro. It has been over six months since you last edited the
".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply
edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at
this link
. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DannyS712 (talk ) 15:31, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[ reply ]