User talk:ESkog/Archive1F
Ape_shaking_head.gif
Thank you for a copyright warning. This file is tagged Public Domain. Cuddlyable3 (talk) 16:23, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Sarah Geronimo Images
Hi there! I wonder why you delete this images? I put all necessary information and license too. If there's a problem in my flickr, I'll try to fix it. But please tell me what is it so I can bring it back in the article.--Wht_Pal888 (talk) 14:09, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Never Mind! I finally notice what's wrong in my image. Anyway, thanks for deleting the first one. I've uploaded it again, but this time, I use the right license. Again, thank you for your concern.--Wht_Pal888 (talk) 14:33, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Hey there again! Didn't you read my last message? I've finally change the NC thing. Please reply sir, since I've made this changes, can I put back the image?
SIr, If you don't reply within 30 min. I have to put back the image because, I need to rest now and I've already change the NC thing in my Flickr and the license too. Again, please reply and thank you for your concern. --Wht_Pal888 (talk) 14:41, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
I've already remove the "Non-Commercial" thing in the flickr. Now If you wouldn't mind, I'm going to re-upload the image because I've already fix the "Non-Commercial" thing that you've said.--Wht_Pal888 (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
- Hi again! sorry if I disturb you so much. Once again, I've changed the license thing and I put it on "Attribution Creative Commons" since it matches the license of image that I uploaded here in wiki. Do I need to revert it back to "Non-Commercial"?
- One more question, is it wrong if (the next photos that I will upload) I use the "Own work , released into public domain" License since it is really my own work? Or do I really need to to stick back in the old thing like "Creative Commons" thingy?
Again, sorry for all the trouble and thanks for your concern.--Wht_Pal888 (talk) 16:32, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
- Ok! Thanks sir! and sorry for all my troubles.--Wht_Pal888 (talk) 23:43, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Pauline Kael, and posters
- The text as you've left it on the article makes it look an unreadable mass of verbiage, and the images were making the page look more interesting to read, they were intimately connected with the words and I find your actions destructive of the article and the encyclopedia. Is the use of not one image allowable on the film criticism page. I was told before that stills from films etc, were o.k but on the 'going steady' page you deleted them all, bulldozer it all, mae marsh in 'intolerance', which is a film she recommends people see, petula clark, no, get rid of it all, make the page unreadable, .. The rules say reasonable use , if its connected to the content, I dont think I breached either in trying to create, an attractive , readable article. Its crap now. Sayerslle (talk) 11:10, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- Please explain which rule I am breaking. You tell me, I read the rules and don't understand. In simple words explain why your destruction of the look of the page helps the encylopedia. You've taken all the images away. Is not one allowable, no poster, no screenshot. You tell me the rule I've broken In straightforward language please. Sayerslle (talk) 23:10, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- 'Decorative purpose - without any critical commentary on that image - the text is totally about criticism of the depicted images, take the mae marsh screenshot , where the text discusses what the image of mae marsh conjures up..Thats on the 'going steady' article, take a look at the mae marsh photo and read the words underneath, and tell me they are not critical commentary on that image, the fact that without any sense of care you bulldoze over the article, - , you are making the articles an unreadable mass of verbiage - is that what you want. Sayerslle (talk) 13:41, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- I used a lot of images on the article The Crystal Bucket, by Clive James too, which is about a book. Perhaps you could look at that article too because maybe the use of images there is wrong too. Thanks for your help.Sayerslle (talk) 11:06, 1 March 2010 (UTC)]
- Any time Keep up the good work. In all seriousness, I genuinely do not grasp the rules, but I will try and learn them.Sayerslle (talk) 12:29, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the tips on what to look for when using images. It does take time to learn the 'house style' of wikipedia. Sayerslle (talk) 16:35, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
KU Logo
Just FYI, after removing the wrong logo I updated the file to use the newer Trajan logo here File:Kansas logo.gif. The one I removed was the old "circus font" that KU doesn't use anymore. I'm not that familiar with the free-use rules regarded the trajan logo, so it may get deleted i guess... Ryan2845 (talk) 14:43, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
I have just posted some suspected socks there. Edward321 (talk) 15:10, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
Use of copyrighted material at Death and the Maiden Quartet
I have responded to your concern on the talk page. Thank you, --Ravpapa (talk) 15:39, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:JustinMoore2.jpg
nevermind
nevermind but can you keep the picture it matches that information —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sondow209 (talk • contribs) 02:09, 30 April 2010
problem
Assalam o alaikum, I have been trying to put a "website hit counter" on my wikipedia user page, but have been unable to do so.Please guide me to the correct way to do this. I have been following the directions that i found online but the counter doesnt display on the page.
Thank you --Maqsoodshah01 (talk) 17:36, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
Thank you
Thanx for clarifying.I am also a contributor for this encyclopedia.My only intent was to gauge the level of interest of people in the topics.Appreciate the info u provided. --Maqsoodshah01 (talk) 15:20, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Madonna tvt.jpg
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:48, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
Tags
I have found the relevant tags for old PD photos and added them. Can you let me know if they are correct so I can continue? (Cyberia3 (talk) 15:59, 4 May 2010 (UTC))
Ref your message
What is the point of the EU wikipedia tag I used if you say it is irrelevant because wikipedia is based in the US? The photos were British products in a British magazine and the British copyright on them has run out. What has that got to do with America? Absolutely nothing! The US tags you suggested are for US copyright and the magazine was not copyrighted in America.
I have added further information on the sources as requested. (Cyberia3 (talk) 10:34, 5 May 2010 (UTC))
Copyright
I can understand that if someone printed a set of encyclopedias they would want every possible copyright issue sorted out beforehand rather than maybe having to get them pulped if there was something very seriously wrong. But with wikipedia, if someone complained, had proof and was sufficiently upset over it, it would take literally a minute to remove the offending image from the database.
Then again, who would get upset over an image of themselves unless it was something very personal or insulting? It is expected of famous people that their picture is taken many times, and used many times. The people in this case have mostly been dead for decades, having been born in the 1800's or very early 1900's so are hardly likely to complain. Neither are workers from two long defunct magazine titles. I am waiting for someone to tell me something positive so I can continue adding over a hundred missing pictures to wikipedia. (Cyberia3 (talk) 14:26, 6 May 2010 (UTC))
File:Dublinlockout.jpg
Why did you tag this. Has someone gone and moved the goal posts again ? Its clearly tagged Gnevin (talk) 16:06, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Gnevin (talk) 20:30, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Map-sighhill-alignments.JPG
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
McMarcoP (talk) 15:26, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks mate. McMarcoP (talk) 15:43, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Erk
Hi, Erk. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.124.4.116 (talk) 01:42, 11 May 2010 (UTC)