User talk:eduardog3000

Welcome!

Hello, Eduardog3000, and

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• Article Wizard
  if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

]

Dan Brown (YouTube)

]

Nomination of

Dan Brown (YouTube)

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Brown (YouTube)(2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. MikeWazowski (talk) 15:16, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Lugia2453. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to February 6, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Lugia2453 (talk) 21:21, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not create humorous redirects, as you did with

Hi, maybe I'm wrong, but I think that Sanders 2020 logo is a bit darker than the 2016 version, as you can see here. -- Nick.mon (talk) 22:23, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

His logo comes in a lot of color combinations, that one is just on his store. Unfortunately the only copies of the logo hosted on his website right now are that one which has been up for a while, and was edited from the original to be a store logo, and the one on the homepage which is all white. His announcement videos actually used an alternate version where "Bernie" is blue but the top stripe is white and the middle is transparent.^[1] We should wait for official campaign material to start coming out. The 2016 SVG is actually from a Flyer PDF from his site. --eduardog3000 (talk) 22:32, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Nick.mon: Ok, I actually found a recent SVG copy of his logo on his campaign signup page.^[2] It does have different colors, so I've uploaded it as File:Bernie_Sanders_2020_logo.svg. --eduardog3000 (talk) 23:14, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thank you so much! -- Nick.mon (talk) 12:38, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I noticed that you reverted my edits to the 2020 Democratic Primaries election article. I have found many reliable third-party sources reporting Beto O’Rourke’s official announcement today regarding his run and campaign for presidency. Thanks Mrbeastmodeallday (talk) 04:37, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

He hasn't announced quite yet. He is currently listed in a section for candidates who have scheduled announcements, with sources for that. Once he actually announces later today (probably wait until he posts something about it to social media, or if you get an email from him confirming it) you can move him to the table. Please try to keep with the format of the table, and use the "Show preview" button instead of Publishing the changes then correcting mistakes afterward. --eduardog3000 (talk) 04:46, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called

page-specific restrictions

, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the

Arbitration Committee's decision here

. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

- MrX 🖋 16:19, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eduardog3000.Y ou are only allowed to make on revert in 24 hours on 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries. You made two. I'm not sure why you ignored the prominent notice at the top of the editing window, but please don't do it again or you may be blocked from editing or topic banned.- MrX 🖋 16:24, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, that slipped my mind as those were in different waking periods. I'll be more careful about that. --eduardog3000 (talk) 18:05, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to apologize to you for briefly deleting your controversy section on Draft: Joshua Collins. The section has validity, and I have re-added it with some small edits. I am also personally sympathetic to the Collins campaign, though trying to keep this bias out of my edits as best as I can. I have been on enough political pages recently that have had unnecessary controversy sections added, and have gotten into a habit of purging them. However, I never want to become one of the people who just deletes things off Wikipedia. (They're one of the things I don't like on here.) So, I apologize for deleting your valid edit, I have done my best to correct it, and thank you for making the Wikipedia community better. PickleG13 (talk) 21:28, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@PickleG13: All good, the edits you just made to it are pretty good imo. --eduardog3000 (talk) 21:30, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Super Thursday (disambiguation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2011 United Kingdom elections.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:52, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

an ARCA clarified a doubt in the area.

The 30 day / 500 restriction (often dubbed Arbpia) is on the talk page notice and on another one that you see when you edit an article falling under those sanctions. If you are not extended confirmed (30/500) then you can't take part in formal discussions about that article (so, RFC, RM, AfD and so on).

A pain. Get your 500/30 and you can stop worrying about it.Selfstudier (talk) 17:35, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Balkans or Eastern Europe. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called

page-specific restrictions

, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{

guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here

. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

January 2024

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in Uyghur genocide, or topics that are related to Uyghurs or Uyghur genocide. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions , when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 22:47, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply