User talk:Edwarddutton

Archives

1

Good work on Treve. Just so we don't duplicate, I have Kizuna in my sandbox atm. Busy weekend! Tigerboy1966  14:59, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think we can safely say that Noble Mission is now worth an article of his own. He's changed from the horse who always ran well but couldn't win a big one into a bit of a "win machine". Tigerboy1966  14:51, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

His big brother would be very proud of him! --Bcp67 (talk) 16:32, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Noble Mission, Edwarddutton!

Wikipedia editor Carriearchdale just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you!

To reply, leave a comment on Carriearchdale's talk page.

Learn more about

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Montanabw -- Montanabw (talk) 04:21, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply

The article Danehill Dancer you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Danehill Dancer for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Montanabw -- Montanabw (talk) 19:22, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alexander mare is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander mare until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 02:08, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Novae has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 07:33, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]