User talk:ElHef/Archive 1

You're right, of course. Combination of too early sans caffeine and something of a lack of knowledge of RFA. Thank you for the quick correction. I'll make sure to keep my common sense with me going forward, won't happen again! --

ElHef (Meep?

) 14:21, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your prompt and clueful () response. I look forward to running into you in the future! Theopolisme (talk) 14:23, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

On my latest comment in the Beyoncé talk section. thanks--

Hello, ElHef. You have new messages at Template talk:Vandalism information.
Message added 03:25, 24 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Just checking through your edits, you appear to have a good grasp of what vandalism is. You may wish to consider applying for the WP:Rollback tool in the not too distant future. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:27, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

I've read a bit about rollback before... I guess I'm unclear on why it's there. I have no need for a permission I don't need just because it's there, and it seems to me that the functionality is duplicated or even superceded by Twinkle. The only thing I have noticed is that it's required in order to use Huggle, so my assumption right now is that being granted rollback permission is essentially being granted Huggle permission - am I right on that? (And if so, what exactly does Huggle do? I learn best by doing, so the sweeping statements in the manual about "monitoring recent changes and fighting vandalism" aren't all that helpful without being able to play around with it.) --ElHef (Meep?) 17:02, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

I don't actually know what Huggle does either - never used it because it doesn't work on Mac. Rollback was just a suggestion, but if you're happy with using TW, I certainly wouldn't want to force a user right on you that you don't want or need. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Heh, understood. I'm not opposed to having it, and I know that there are a lot of people using things like Huggle and STiki, so I'm not dismissing it either. If I find myself wanting to explore some other options I'll definitely take a look at rollback. I'm good with Twinkle for now, though, and I certainly appreciate the compliment! --ElHef (Meep?) 01:57, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

I do not think you have been to Pinon. there is no source to add, but I know what my hometown looks like. I am trying to tell people about building roads to pinon, az as this will only help with their trip planning.

please put my edits back on the pinon page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.230.44.12 (talk) 20:18, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

I understand that you're only trying to do good for your hometown. However, Wikipedia's core content policies prohibit

reliable source to support the information you would like added, it cannot be added to Wikipedia. --ElHef (Meep?

) 21:02, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

I've responded to your reply. I think it could be mentioned at the IOC article as well, but I think the Olympic Sports article is the most relevant article for the content in question. 85.167.109.26 (talk) 11:03, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Y Replied on the article talk page. --ElHef (Meep?) 22:28, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Could you add the classification section? We can add winter information when it is publicly available; perhaps it will be mentioned somewhere after Sochi. 85.167.109.26 (talk) 11:01, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, ElHef, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Information about STiki, including: Using STiki and its hotkeys Comparison with other tools Information about vandalism on Wikipedia Here are some pages which are a little more fun: The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users! Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes! We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 05:40, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello! Due to a security update to the wiki software, older versions of STiki are no longer functional. You've been identified as a user of STiki, and are kindly asked to upgrade to the current version at Wikipedia:STiki#Download before continuing with use of the tool. Continuing to use older versions will be detrimental to the STiki project. Please see Wikipedia talk:STiki#Errors for a discussion of this issue or to respond to this message. Thank you! 04:20, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

this Wiki reference "Law of Complexity/Consciousness" by Pierre Teilhard de Chardin as a modern update ^[1]172.248.114.28 (talk) 21:40, 13 December 2013 (UTC)arnold

It's possible, sure. I'm not at all familiar with the subject area so I can't comment on the content. The problems you've been having are because you're not adding finished content to a live article. If you're going to edit articles, you need to be adding finished, encyclopedic content to the article. Adding suggestions, recommendations, misspelled words, information that is misplaced, etc is not going to stay in an article very long. Remember that whatever you put into the article goes out for everyone to see. I would recommend trying out your edits on a

new contributor's help page. --ElHef (Meep?

) 00:51, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank you, arnold — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.248.114.28 (talk) 15:16, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.