This user may have left Wikipedia . Elbeonore has not edited Wikipedia since September 9, 2009 . As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.
Hi fellow Wikipedian , and a
Be Bold
! Here's some good links for your reference and that'll get you started in no time!
Editing tutorial
, learn to have fun with Wikipedia.
Picture tutorial
, instructions on uploading images.
How to write a great article
, to make it an featured article status.
Manual of Style , how articles should be written.
Most Wikipedians would prefer to just work on articles of their own interest. But if you have some free time to spare, here are some
open tasks
that you may want to help out :
vandalism
.
Cleanup - Help make unreadable articles readable.
Requests
- Wanted on WP, but hasn't been created.
Merge
- Combining duplicate articles into one.
Wikiprojects - So many to join, so many to choose from...Take your pick!
Oh yes, don't forget to sign when you write on Mailer Diablo 05:21, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
[ reply ]
The article
]
Hey, i noticed your edits on TR's article. Do you have a source for TSH being a full feature. i got the impression it was a short (the first thing i heard about it, on the IMDb boards, said it was a short) and although i don't think the official site says, this link suggests it's a short. Amo 10:04, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading
copyright tag
, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot . For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions . 09:31, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[ reply ]
As per Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) , minor characters do not merit standalone articles. Therefore, I have recommended it for deletion. Clarityfiend 22:45, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Hello, just to let you know that Wikipedia articles shouldnt have Trivia section (see
Wikipedia:Avoid trivia sections in articles). Any important facts should be merged into other sections. --
Berks105 11:10, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
As "an image of a living person that merely shows what s/he looks like", the photo of Sei Ashina is not fair use in the context of her article. Please refer to
WP:FU for more information. The addition violates Wikipedia policy, and I'm therefore reverting it, as in the past.
Dekimasu よ! 06:18, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Hi Elbeonore. Hope you are enjoying editing. Would you like to your inline references to appear in the reference section? I can add full citations unless you prefer the way it is. Regards, ☻ Fred |☝ discussion |✍ contributions 17:27, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
I was just about to fix Bruchia bolanderi , I think Brontë will be more interesting :) ☻ Fred |☝ discussion |✍ contributions 20:03, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Hello, the category you've created, Category:Pride & Prejudice , has been nominated for deletion here . Please feel free to comment in the discussion and give your thoughts on perhaps merging these articles into more discriminate categories to better satisfy policy. Take care, María (habla conmigo ) 18:53, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to
here
.
Please go to
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions " link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page . Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 00:05, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
I'll try to do that tonight. Sorry that I didn't do it sooner! Elbeonore 03:37, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Amadeus (film)
Reverted the Amadeus page due to some "editor" trying to turn it into some bizarre, rambling essay. But I saw you made some additions that you might want to put back :).
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media ).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions " link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion . Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:07, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Replaceable fair use
Thanks for uploading
first fair use criterion
in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
Go to di-replaceable fair use disputed
}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template .
On the image discussion page , write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license , or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link . Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our
]
Thanks for uploading
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
]
Hi, I just wanted to let you know that I redirected
Jurassic Park IV. If
Twilight enters actual production, a stand-alone article can be created. In the meantime, though, feel free to update about the film at its section at the novel's article. Let me know if you have any questions! —
Erik (
talk •
contrib ) - 22:25, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
This is an automated message from
Ironside: A Modern Faery's Tale, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page:
Ironside (novel) . It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page . CorenSearchBot 18:12, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
]
CSD A7
.
Under the
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add
{{ hangon
}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{ hangon }}
on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Pig man 16:19, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Hi, I wanted to inform you that the
notability guidelines for films stipulates that a stand-alone article for a film should be created when it enters production. This is because due to the nature of the film industry in which a project can stall before production begins and wind up in
development hell . You can generally check to see if a film is in production by going to its IMDb listing and looking at the status, which should say Filming, Post-production, or Complete. —
Erik (
talk •
contrib ) - 23:05, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion . If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page . Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:47, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
I have tagged
Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you.
Wbrz 10:46, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion . If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page . Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:40, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to .
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions " link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page . Thank you. Yamla 19:51, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to .
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions " link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page . Thank you. Yamla (talk ) 16:08, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media ).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "
talk) 20:33, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to .
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions " link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page . Thank you. Tubetends (talk ) 19:24, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
talk) 17:33, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
[ reply ]
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media ).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions " link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion . Thank you. BJBot (talk ) 04:30, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[ reply ]
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media ).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions " link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion . Thank you. BJBot (talk ) 01:26, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[ reply ]
which has been tagged as not having a rationale for more than 7 days.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon }}
to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Emma Ferguson.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Yamanbaiia (free hugs! ) 21:44, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[ reply ]
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media ).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions " link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion . Thank you. BJBot (talk ) 07:13, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[ reply ]
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media ).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions " link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion . Thank you. BJBot (talk ) 07:42, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[ reply ]
You've uploaded
Wikipedia's rules for non-free images
. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot . For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions . 05:11, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[ reply ]
Hello. I'm part of a research group at the University of Washington (Seattle campus), and my group is reaching out to Wikipedians in the Puget Sound area. We're hosting a focus group designed to gather information on what Wikipedians would like to know about each other when interacting on Wikipedia. Our end goal is to create an embedded application that helps people quickly know more about others' history and activity on Wikipedia, and we feel our design will be much more useful if it's based on insights of users like you.
I'm hoping that the chance to help out local researchers, to engage in lively face-to-face discussion with other Seattle Wikipedians, and to contribute to Wikipedia in a new way will entice you to join us. The session lasts 2 hours and snacks are provided. Sessions will be held on UW Seattle campus - directions will be sent after registration. Your contribution will be greatly appreciated!
Willing and able to help us out? RSVP here . Want to know more? Visit our user talk page . Please help us contact other local Wikipedians, too! Commprac01 (talk ) 02:51, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[ reply ]
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media ).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions " link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion . Thank you. BJBot (talk ) 05:07, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[ reply ]
unreferencedBLP
}} tag. Here is the article:
Crispin Bonham-Carter - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs ) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk ) 01:38, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to .
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions " link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page . Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk ) 10:41, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[ reply ]
⚠ Thanks for uploading You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media ).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "
talk) 06:08, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
[ reply ]
⚠ Thanks for uploading You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media ).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "
talk) 04:42, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to
the file description page , and edit it to include a
non-free rationale .
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions " link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion . If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page . Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk ) 12:16, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[ reply ]
i liked ur pick of indian peacock its my fav bird can u put this pic in file peacock. thanxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sawant Mukta (talk • contribs ) 12:59, 19 December 2011 (UTC) [ reply ]
A file that you uploaded or altered,
Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the
discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
Sfan00 IMG (
talk ) 17:51, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to
the file description page , and edit it to include a
non-free rationale .
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions " link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion . If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page . Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk ) 15:19, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to
the file description page , and edit it to include a
non-free rationale .
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions " link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion . If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page . Thank you. ukexpat (talk ) 15:40, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[ reply ]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article .
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Octavia (TV serial) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Robofish (talk ) 12:43, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[ reply ]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vanessa Johansson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted .
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanessa Johansson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Bongwarrior (talk ) 23:48, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[ reply ]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emily Jewell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted .
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Jewell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk ) 00:03, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[ reply ]