User talk:Elizabennet

Just wanted to drop you a note saying thanks for adding cats to tons of article. It's grunt work, but necessary work to improve Wikipedia.--Supernumerary 20:31, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On the issue of producing company vs. distributor we may have very little reaction and hope of consensus, as it involves going through all the thousands of film infoboxes and replacing the info. It can be done but, for the moment at least, film gnomes (including aquatic species) are still sweating to get more basic things straight. Let's see. Great work you have done, by the way. Hoverfish 20:19, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is to inform you that

Hi here too. Suggestion: We have some members who use AWB, which makes going through 200 articles for a preset change much easier. So we can ask them to do. Let's clear out (in the cat department) a set of changes first and then Cbrown or Nehrams can run them semi-automatically. Hoverfish Talk 21:56, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you are doing with the template (I'm just a beginner in their "esoteric" aspects, but if you explain further I may get it). I have seen the 14 articles of Category:Films by decade. Some of them are neglected but some keep being updated by several users. We need consensus to do AfD on film articles. Removing their category leaves them simply uncategorized, so next someone will put them back. But since this involves film lists (and not categories), we should start a discussion in the main film project. There we may get an idea of whether it will be a smooth move or not. Hoverfish Talk 22:46, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, what do you think of the template {{filmsbyyear}} ? E.S.Blofeld started creating this series. He had to stop, but it may be used later (if the "Films released in year" split from the years in films articles). For the moment they have all redirects to the categories (as in Category:1999 films), so the template works. But I can also create another one to navigate in categories only. Hoverfish Talk 23:11, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for you message I have been bold and changed the guidance for the infobox and put my reasons in a descussion point there. I can see what you were meaning but I do think that we ought to use "Media_type" the same way (roughly at least between the two infoboxes. Anyway let me know what you think, and I agree consistency is what we are after, closely followed by simplicity. :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 08:58, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for doing that it seems like a good way to proceed. Thanks again :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 08:41, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ahoy there! StopVandalsNow 21:19, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The

The July 2009 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Alan16(talk)

The

Wikipedia ads	file info – #190

-- Alan16 (talk) 10:32, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The August 2009 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Alan16 (talk) 17:26, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The

Userbox for D Phi E.

You may want to disambiguate the D Phi E userbox so that it points to [[Delta Phi Epsilon (social)|Delta Phi Epsilon]]Naraht (talk) 14:27, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Amityville Horror (film series)

The article

The Amityville Horror (film series) has been proposed for deletion

because of the following concern:

No reason for grouping. As stated, the films are unrelated. Data already integrated into The Amityville Horror (disambiguation).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{

the article's talk page

.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{

dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. uKER (talk) 21:18, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

New WikiProject Novels initiative

We have begun a new initiative at the WikiProject Novels: an improvement drive. As a member listed here, you are being notified. Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Novels#5-5-5 Improvement Drive and Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Collaboration for more details. Also I would like to remind you to keep an eye on the project talk page at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Novels. Thanks, Sadads (talk) 02:23, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Novels Collaboration for February

Thank you everyone who participated in the

WikiProject Novels. Please join us, and help us wikify, reference, clean up plot sections and generally improve Novels content, Sadads (talk) 22:09, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

You are recieving this message because you are a member of WikiProject Novels according to Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Members

An RfC that you may be interested in...

As one of the previous contributors to {{

RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters

. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox short story

Template:Infobox short story has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rezonansowy (talk | contribs) 23:04, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

New member in the Fraternity & Sorority Wikiproject!

Hello Lizconno, I am currently a student and taking a class about wikipedia. One of assignments is to join a wikipedia project and contribute to some degree. I saw your name on the participants page, and was wondering if you had any advice or direction to give me. Thanks! Fl4812a (talk) 20:24, 13 February 2016 (UTC) Fl4812a[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Nomination for merging of

Template:Infobox film festival

Template:Infobox theatre festival. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:49, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox short story

Template:Infobox short story has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox book. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. --Trialpears (talk) 09:59, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox short story

Template:Infobox short story has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox folk tale. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 12:38, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Broken (Armstrong novel) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Broken (Armstrong novel), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Broken (Armstrong novel) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]