User talk:EpidemiaCorinthiana

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article

Also, when you post on

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of FIFA Club World Cup participants, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages OFC, AFC and CAF (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Honorável membro do bando de loucos,

Well, if you know people who usually review this kind of thing you could ask them to take a look at the article, cutting the wait. igordebraga ≠ 23:13, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think I can. igordebraga ≠ 17:41, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• You use unexplained terrible colours in the template {{FIFA Club World Cup}}. NickSt (talk) 14:33, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • You using ip reverted the addition the absolutely relevant templates {{FIFA Club World Cup winners}} and {{FIFA Club World Championship and Club World Cup top scorers}} in the aricle FIFA Club World Cup. [1] [2] [3]. NickSt (talk) 14:54, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked

Hello. I've reverted your redirect of this list. The article was kept at this deletion discussion, albeit by lack of consensus, so it'd probably be best to start another discussion if you think it shouldn't be here at all. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 14:06, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, a quick look at some of your edits has shown that you're moving pages without consensus, and, worse, copying and pasting from one to another. This is entirely unacceptable, see

Also, please stop re-adding a speedy deletion notice to

WP:SPEEDY and follow them rather than incorrectly re-adding the tag. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:46, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Ok, if you disagree with the removal of a speedy tag, you should list the article in question at

WP:RM is the place for that, since your moves have been reverted. Thanks. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:10, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

I understand. Just don't rush in like a bull in a china shop. Get some consensus at

WT:FOOTBALL or somewhere similar before making such wide and drastic changes. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:31, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

• One question please. Indef blocked God Football (talk · contribs) is your old nickname? The same activity... NickSt (talk) 02:46, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wow...desperate, are we? Who am I nex? Elvis? EpidemiaCorinthiana (talk) 03:07, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. EpidemiaCorinthiana (talk · contribs) now is under sockpuppet investigation with indef blocked God Football (talk · contribs). See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/God Football. NickSt (talk) 03:41, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of FIFA Club World Championship and Club World Cup goalscorers (one goal) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of FIFA Club World Championship and Club World Cup goalscorers (one goal) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NickSt (talk) 02:07, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You must not remove an AfD tag from an article while the deletion discussion is underway, as you did in this edit. Whether you think the discussion is irrelevant does permit you to do this. This is made very clear in the text you removed. By all means express your opinion in the linked discussion, but if you remove the tag again I will block you from editing Wikipedia. -- Finlay McWalterჷTalk 03:14, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have ignored my warning and again removed the mandatory tag in this edit. Your conduct, and your edit summaries, suggest it is your intention to disrupt this deletion debate. So, as I told you I would, I have blocked your account from editing. -- Finlay McWalterჷTalk 03:21, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EpidemiaCorinthiana (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The admin who blocked me merely blocked me out of spite, it seems. Not even a 3RR. Interestingly, this came about after I mentioned that a suspiciously looking

Tag Team

was taking place especially when you see his pattern of edits. Never mind that the he blocked me for 3 days for almost nothing.

Decline reason:

Per

WP:3RR, that "is not an entitlement to revert a page a specific number of times". You removed an AfD notice after a discussion was started, the text of the comment within the template makes it very clear that you cannot, and you were warned not to do so. This block appears justified. Kinu ^t/_c 04:00, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.