User talk:Erictheenquirer

Welcome!

Hello, Erictheenquirer, and

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called

• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

]

Erictheenquirer, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Erictheenquirer! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host) talk) 01:17, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply ]

September 2013

Hello, I'm

That's why we have the History of Palestine article.

Could you please reconsider?

Hi. I have commented on the talk page about the edit you made. Kingsindian (talk) 17:23, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hamas may have broken the syntax by modifying 3 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Policy"] The Heritage Foundation. June 27, 2007</ref> Argentina, Chile, Brazil, Mexico,<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.ajc.org/site/apps/nlnet/content3.aspx?c=7oJILSPwFfJSG&b=8478237&
• Palestine Policy |publisher=Jamestown.org |date= |accessdate=2014-08-02}}</ref>, South Africa,<ref>{cite web | url=http://www.dfa.gov.za/docs/2007pq/pq1095.htm | title=Status on the Relations between

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the
  2014 kidnapping and murder of Israeli teenagers page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help
  )

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

• On the Beitunia killings page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
• On the
  2014 kidnapping and murder of Israeli teenagers page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help
  )

@Yaakovaryeh: - many thanks for your effort. I suck at checking orphaned references. I see that it was corrected - perhaps by you. Sincere thanks. Erictheenquirer (talk) 11:13, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the 2008 Israel–Hamas ceasefire page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Tantura page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

Indeed - I lost an email address and then a password and had great difficulty in trying to retrieve it, so I created a new account.Erictheenquirer (talk) 10:48, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok , thanks. Any other previous accounts you'd like to disclose?

talk) 16:18, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Nope - only have the one active account. Any idea how I can get rid of the redundant (inaccessible) Enquiringeric account? I hate having loose ends lying around, and there is always the risk of bad-faith accusations of "sock-puppeteering". Your help would be much appreciated. Erictheenquirer (talk) 12:54, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Have you previously edited under any other accounts (whether inactive now, or IP)? Epeefleche (talk) 20:19, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have only ever had two accounts as I explained to

Brad Dyer, with similar names. I had problems (password and/or logging onto G-mail) with one of them, so I abandoned it. I now only use Erictheenquirer. I am sure that it can be verified that there is no overlap between the two in time. I asked Brad if he knew how to get rid of the redundant User:Enquiringeric, but it seems that he did not, so unfortunately this will continue to be the case in the future, and there appears to be nothing that I can do about it. Erictheenquirer (talk) 08:10, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

@

Brad Dyer:Since this is the second time that I have received a question on this topic I have initiated greater efforts to try to get the old user-name erased - it appears that there are indeed means to do so. In the process I discovered that the past problem was not with my G-mail account, so I can only presume that I had Wiki password problems. I will keep this page informed of progress. Erictheenquirer (talk) 08:34, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks. Have you had any other accounts? Even if their names were not similar? Or they are not active (other than the one disclosed above; Enquiringeric)? Or have you edited otherwise as an IP? Happy new year. Epeefleche (talk) 21:30, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, to all questions. As stated before, I only remember 2 accounts, and only one of those is in current use. Erictheenquirer (talk) 09:44, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@

Brad Dyer:I have reported the additional account to Admin, and they have duly noted it. It seems that it is not necessary for me to seek cancellation of the earlier account, because the Wiki rule is not to USE more than one account. Simply HAVING more than one is not a violation. Done and dusted. Erictheenquirer (talk) 08:23, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the
  Palestinian legislative election, 2006 page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help
  )

Hello Eric. I saw that you suggested several additions on the talk page, and put them there for comment first. I made a comment on the inappropriateness of some of the material, but it appears that you have added it anyway. Could you review the talk page comments? Also, it appears that you have messed up some code somewhere on the page, as below a certain point it is all offset – could you fix this please? Thanks, Number 57 21:50, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Number 57:Regrettably I am unable to find the cause of the formatting wobble. Not sure what to do now. Erictheenquirer (talk) 08:38, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised

discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here

.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means

uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks

. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

bARN STAR

		The Mediator Barnstar
		Respect for addressing the POV issue at Palestinian rocket attacks on Israel GregKaye 09:35, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aw shucks!!!! Gracias. Erictheenquirer (talk) 16:14, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the 2006 Gaza cross-border raid page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the
  Gaza beach explosion (2006) page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help
  )

Hi, You may want to read the last Amnesty report, especially the conclusion:

Direct attacks on civilians, the use of prohibited weapons that are inherently indiscriminate, such as unguided rockets, and indiscriminate attacks that kill or injure civilians are all war crimes. The use of imprecise mortars to attack military objectives located in or near residential areas also constitutes an indiscriminate attack. ... The cases detailed in this report form a consistent pattern with similar violations by Palestinian armed groups over more than a decade, including during the conflicts in 2008-

2009 and November 2012. They demonstrate what is, at best, a reckless disregard for the lives of civilians in Israel, as well as a consistent failure to take all feasible precautions to protect civilians in Gaza from the effects of attacks. In some cases, Palestinian armed groups deliberately targeted civilian population centres inside Israel with the intention of injuring and killing Israeli civilians. War crimes, and all crimes under international law, unequivocally attract the individual criminal responsibility of those who order or carry out such attacks. Palestinian officials who attempt to justify rocket attacks and other violations regularly point to violations by Israeli forces, whose attacks as part of Operation Protective Edge had a devastating effect on Gaza. However, violations by one party cannot justify violations by its opponents.

The last part works both ways of course - Palestinian's violations also do not justify whatever violations that Israel committed. Our job as editors is not to find justifications of illegal acts by the side we prefer but to document these alleged violations as they are reported and commented upon. “WarKosign” 07:53, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Hello, Erictheenquirer. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The

discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here

.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

I see that you actively participate in discussions occurring in talk pages. I would like to ask you be more concise while editing TPs. I'm specially commenting on this comment of yours. This way, users will read your comments. --Mhhossein ^talk 14:58, 12 August 2017 (UTC) OK, thanks. My quest for precision clearly often overwhelms me[reply]

Hello, Erictheenquirer. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The

discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here

.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Icewhiz (talk) 13:49, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, if I can suggest that you remove your last comment at

Since this thread is about the

Razan al-Najjar article, I will post here. I appreciate the content, but I have one request: could you focus on including it more to the body of the article? As it stands, the lead has five paragraphs, two or three more than it really requires. It will need to be revised in the near future to be more precise. Again, thanks for the content; we just need to organize it to make a better article.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 18:45, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Agree fully. First attempting to sort out disputes. Structure will follow. Erictheenquirer (talk) 06:02, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Per third ARBPIA bullet: "If an edit is reverted by another editor, its original author may not restore it within 24 hours of the first revert made to their edit." Meaning, you should have waited at least 24 hours after MY EDIT before reinserting your disputed content. Revert yourself (this edit) or I'll report you.--יניב הורון (Yaniv) (talk) 16:08, 22 June 2018 (UTC) Too difficult to implement. Apologies Erictheenquirer (talk) 17:01, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Erictheenquirer. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]