welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered
vandalism . If you continue in this manner you may be
blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you.
Do not change it again, you are not right in deleting that.
John Reaves 23:30, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
[ reply ]
When
for full information on this feature.
Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. John Reaves 06:05, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[ reply ]
thank you for editing "live at the hammerstein ballroom". however, placing 3 or 4 different types of uncat tag is both useless and frustrating for the next editor. please refrain from doing this in the future.
--
O keyes 08:44, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
ahh, apologies. i attempted to find the editor who created the various tags by scrolling through the previous edits until i found the uncat tags in use. evidently only the one was displayed.
--
O keyes 11:47, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Hi Evanreyes,
I saw you had contributed to the list of top hat wearers on the Top hat page a while back (I think last August), so I think you might be interested in a move to delete List of bow tie wearers . That list could be combined with the Bow tie article, but I'm arguing that the list should stay as is. If you have an interest in whether or not that list should stay, please visit the deletion discussion (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of bow tie wearers ) and throw your two cents in. Noroton 21:04, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Thanks for replying
No prob. Hope I didn't bother you, Noroton 22:03, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Per
Wikipedia:Naming conventions#Album titles and band names, the proper title of this article is
Push It To The Limit . Specifically, the policy states:
In band names and titles of songs or albums… Note that short verbs (Is , Are , Do ) and pronouns (Me , It , His ) are capitalized.House of Scandal 02:08, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
I am looking over the guidelines to make sure I am not wrong in this after scolding you! Please don't make another move until we suss it out okay? Thanks. House of Scandal 02:08, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Actually, I believe the proper title of the article *should* be WP:RM though. Don't just copy and paste when moving to the correct title. ---
RockMFR 02:12, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
A while ago, I made an article called James Brown is Dead shouldn't have been moved. Does that seem right? However, we can't just move the article via cut-and-paste. The history has to be moved too which is a whole adminstrator thing.
House of Scandal 02:18, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Okay, I missed "short verbs are capitalized" meaning JBID is okay. I will ask an admin to move PITTL. House of Scandal 02:29, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
In case you weren't aware there are guidelines for naming of TV show articles, these are available at
WP:NCTV - specifically "For an article created about a single episode, add the series name in parentheses only if there are other articles by the same name". This has also been the subject of a recent
arbitration case , the outcome being that going against the consensus for those naming conventions can result in a short ban. Please avoid making such moves. --
pgk 09:33, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
I'm not aware of all the background to the debate on it, so can't give you the arguments as to why the inconsistency is valid. The fact that it got as far as arbitration suggests that it has created a fair amount of bad feeling, so I guess the best thing to do is be careful. It's an unfortunate facet of wikipedia being this large, but in order to keep the peace people willfully ignoring that particular guide are likely to find themselves blocked for short periods. In this case no real harm done, just wanted to make sure you were knew you could find yourself walking into a controversial area. --pgk 10:00, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
There was a long debate that resulted in about an 80% supermajority to disambiguate only when necessary. Some in the minority did not accept this, leading to much acrimony, page move warring, and incivil comments being made. The details are at Thatcher131 19:00, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Concerning your recent edits to the article
63rd Golden Globe Awards nominees. I've now reverted yet again your edit, per the exact same reasons as before. Also noting that the format in question is used in the articles for other "main" awards (see, for instance, the
79th Academy Awards , which is a somewhat recently created article).
I asked in my previous revert that if there was any particular reason for this, that it be brought up on the talk page
beforehand . Instead, you repeated the edit, with what appears to be an automatic edit summary.
Do not revert this again without a previous discussion on the talk page. Thank you.
Redux 03:51, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Thank you for responding. It was indeed looking like an automated edit, on account of the edit summary. I had even considered that you could have been a bot, although the username was lacking the..."bot" part. Well, all seems resolved now. Cheers, Redux 11:22, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Please don't change things on my user page without asking first, I had the 'For' in 'Death Cab For Cutie' capitalized for a reason. -- Jowan2005
I have it at what I consider correct. -- Jowan2005
Hi. I realise that leaving Bjork without her umlaut was incorrect. But isn't it rather rude just to edit someone's user page without asking, saying hello, or saying why you're even interested? User pages aren't encyclopedic. White hotel 13:20, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
I know where you were going with the AWB edits on that talk page, but "&" and "and" were there for a reason, so I rv'd it. It happens :) Mchmike 03:53, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Careful, you added an ! to Reno 911! when one was already there. Vees 23:11, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
As you can see here, you clearly have edited on
The Apprentice UK
under 2 months ago.
[1]
I expect a return apology for your rudness. Dalejenkins 21:48, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
So I'm supposed to measure your opinions on a topic by the quality of your edits. COME ON! If you edit on an article, it's safe to asssume you have an intrest on what the article is about! Dalejenkins 16:54, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Please be careful with tools that can make multiple changes. I've reverted your edit to Wikipedia:Articles for creation/2006-12-07 . Cheers. --Geniac 14:19, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Bros/Bro's
I'm pretty sure the official title has an apostrophe in it, however awkward that look in normal English: Fat Cat official site . I'm going to revert your changes in the morning unless you can show that I've missed something. At the very least, it's the official name of the single, even if it is different on the LP. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zeichman (talk • contribs ) 00:06, March 24, 2007
Eep
I was not aware. Thanks for helpin' me out.
-- mr ethanboy 14:33, 24 March 2007
this edit to Donnie Darko didn't seem quite correct, so I changed it back. V-Man - T /C 03:47, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
You can not just change a redirect from one article to another. Where there are more than one possible link, a disambiguation page should be written. I have done that. Also look at the pages that link to it before making a decision. In this case that was only one link from the user page of the editor that originally wrote the article on the chemistry software with that title. It was moved latter. --Bduke 08:53, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
According to Wikipedia, a microphone is "sometimes referred to as a mike or mic." And Comedy Central's info on the episode spelled it as 'mike.' So that's how it's spelled in the episode summary. I don't know why this is such a big deal... --DrBat 21:08, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
You bet! Gotta get more info in there, though. I created the Bulls one too, and it took off after I made it. Hopefully, the same thing will happen here...--Longman391 15:23, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
You edited the
Shankbone 15:24, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
talk) 21:45, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Thank you for uploading
image copyright tag
; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our
talk) 14:36, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
[ reply ]
WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the
bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that
this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (
talk ) 00:00, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
[ reply ]
The two articles are the same. Wouldn't it be better to delete the
]
Just out of curiosity, why's it called ]
Ah okay. In that case I'm going to tag it for deletion as a redundant redirect, if that's okay with you? PeterSymonds | talk 05:57, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[ reply ]
for full information on this feature.
Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field - please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. -Phoenixrod (talk ) 05:22, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[ reply ]
Seriously, use edit summaries. It's not hard. -Phoenixrod (talk ) 16:10, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[ reply ]
A
dated prod
}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page .
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
]
An article that you have been involved in editing, Michael Q. Schmidt , has been listed for deletion . If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Q. Schmidt (2nd nomination) . Thank you.'Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 18:04, 15 October 2008 (UTC) Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? [ reply ]
Thanks for uploading
Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an
explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot . For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions . --FairuseBot (talk ) 07:54, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[ reply ]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Laguna Beach soundtrack , suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
List's stated intent is to give a list of songs featured in a particular TV series. No indication is given that these tracks were ever released as a compilation album. No justification as to why this is a particular cultural phenomenon is given. This is a non-encyclopedic cross-categorization per WP:NOTDIR. Information is non-notable trivia and cannot reasonably be added to List of Laguna Beach episodes. The article should therefore be deleted.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
dated prod
}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page .
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
]
An article that you have been involved in editing, Laguna Beach soundtrack , has been listed for deletion . If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laguna Beach soundtrack . Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Rogerb67 (talk ) 01:24, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[ reply ]
Hello. I'm part of a research group at the University of Washington (Seattle campus), and my group is reaching out to Wikipedians in the Puget Sound area. We're hosting a focus group designed to gather information on what Wikipedians would like to know about each other when interacting on Wikipedia. Our end goal is to create an embedded application that helps people quickly know more about others' history and activity on Wikipedia, and we feel our design will be much more useful if it's based on insights of users like you.
I'm hoping that the chance to help out local researchers, to engage in lively face-to-face discussion with other Seattle Wikipedians, and to contribute to Wikipedia in a new way will entice you to join us. The session lasts 2 hours and snacks are provided. Sessions will be held on UW Seattle campus - directions will be sent after registration. Your contribution will be greatly appreciated!
Willing and able to help us out? RSVP here . Want to know more? Visit our user talk page . Please help us contact other local Wikipedians, too! Commprac01 (talk ) 02:52, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[ reply ]
What Wikipedia is not
").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to
sign your comments
with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the
articles for deletion
template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a
talk) 01:14, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Why did you move the
]
⚠ Thanks for uploading You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media ).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "
talk) 03:40, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
[ reply ]
List of Billboard Hot 100 top 10 singles in 1998
So I know you have everything up to 1999 up, are you gonna be able to do 1998? Arjoccolenty (talk )
A file that you uploaded or altered,
Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the
discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —
Justin (koa vf ) ❤T ☮C ☺M ☯ 07:06, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
[ reply ]
A file that you uploaded or altered,
Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the
discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —
Justin (koa vf ) ❤T ☮C ☺M ☯ 07:06, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
[ reply ]
A file that you uploaded or altered,
Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the
discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —
Justin (koa vf ) ❤T ☮C ☺M ☯ 07:06, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
[ reply ]
A file that you uploaded or altered,
Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the
discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —
Justin (koa vf ) ❤T ☮C ☺M ☯ 07:06, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
[ reply ]
A file that you uploaded or altered,
Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the
discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —
Justin (koa vf ) ❤T ☮C ☺M ☯ 06:48, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
[ reply ]
A file that you uploaded or altered,
Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the
discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —
Justin (koa vf ) ❤T ☮C ☺M ☯ 06:48, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
[ reply ]
⚠ Thanks for uploading claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media ).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion . Thank you. --B-bot (talk ) 03:03, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[ reply ]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect
talk) 17:12, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Hello! There is currently a
]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Men From Up The Stairs and has thus listed it for discussion . This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 16#Men From Up The Stairs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Throast (talk | contribs ) 17:55, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[ reply ]