User talk:Evenewyear

Porque editaste a Hellen toncio?

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Miss Earth 2015 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the
  introduction
  .
• The following is the log entry regarding this message:
  talk) 14:00, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Evenewyear, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Evenewyear! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host) talk) 16:10, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply ]

Reference Errors on 24 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Bárbara Palacios page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

Miss Universe 2015 by --Sunuraju (talk) 05:56, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why is an article written about Eralda Hitaj? Postcard Cathy (talk)

A tag has been placed on Agnesa Vuthaj, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

A tag has been placed on Agnesa Vuthaj requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

]

Proposed deletion of Agnesa Vuthaj

The article Agnesa Vuthaj has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Evidently won the Albanian beauty pageant, but did not win any world wide title. Fails

WP:GNG

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Safiel (talk) 21:22, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miss Colombia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bogata. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

]

Nomination of

Tonie Chisholm

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tonie Chisholm until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 14:55, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete references? You know that should not be. Donaldouglas (talk) 19:05, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Evenewyear. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Golsa Sarabi, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Golsa Sarabi to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Wgolf (talk) 21:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

]

Proposed deletion of Agnesa Vuthaj

The article Agnesa Vuthaj has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

subject is not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Meatsgains (talk) 03:04, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Agnesa Vuthaj is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agnesa Vuthaj until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 08:35, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Agnesa Vuthaj is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agnesa Vuthaj (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dan arndt (talk) 05:34, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]