User talk:EverSince/Archive 2

Please forgive this unsolicited contact, but I note that a couple of weeks ago, you participated in a discussion at Wikipedia regarding the proposed deletion of their entry on OccupyMARINES. Of 26 respondents, 24 voted to Keep; only 2 voted Delete. The result was to Keep the article.

However, it has now been nominated again for deletion, and I thought you might be interested. Here's the URL for the new discussion page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Occupy_Marines_%282nd_nomination%29

JohnValeron (talk) 04:43, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Recovery model (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links to Stress and Case management

Mentalism (discrimination) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver

)

added a link to Mental

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	The Editor's Barnstar
	You did some good work summarizing research at Borderline personality disorder. Bearian (talk) 20:59, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EverSince!

It was really helpful of you to you to upload File:Mark-David-Chapman-as-boy.jpg. However, we need to properly format the image license information in order to keep and use new images.

If you can edit the description and add one of these templates, that would be great. If you're not sure how or would like some help, please ask us at the media copyright questions page and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thanks again! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:06, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's the best edit that's been made to

Thought I'd give it a go in that direction what with all the circling, thanks for the feedback and your peacemaking there... Every (talk) 06:18, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Came here to add my thanks as well, good effort on the rewrite. Wee Curry Monster talk 16:14, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, I kinda realised your point...I hope the others keep editing it if they're ok with it. Every (talk) 16:37, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just dropping by to complement you on the good job you're doing there. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 01:23, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi thanks it seemed like it needed some more work in some areas, am also wondering whether some of the longer subsections could do with being boiled down a bit... Btw I do tend to agree re the image issue, assuming an ideal one can't be found or isn't possible, also thought it best to wait for any other comments. Eversync (talk) 01:50, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Original Barnstar

hi there, I often use wikipedia as a complement to scholarly articles when researching for work or my university studies, and as such came across the article 'Recovery-oriented practice' (or similar title). I work as a case manager in the mental health field and have attended many 'recovery model' training sessions in the course of my work. I found this article to be very well written, comprehensive, objective, and well-balanced, with an excellent list of references and sources used. I was so impressed I had to stop by here to compliment you on it, which is not something I have felt so moved to do before. The external links included were also a great read, particularly the critical analysis of recovery frameworks. Thank you very much for a fantastic contribution to the public! Cindy considine (talk) 13:38, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey thanks for stopping by, that's really good to know, particularly with your involvement in it. I think that might be a better name than recovery approach btw, though it seems tricky when it can be a very personal thing. Just noticed someone's made a

Recovery Coaching too regarding addictions. Thanks again. Eversync (talk) 01:36, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Eversync (talk) 20:54, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Mark-David-Chapman-as-boy.jpg

Thank you for uploading

image copyright tag

; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:01, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Mark David Chapman in 1975.jpeg

Thank you for uploading

image copyright tag

; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:01, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Encourage

Template:Encourage has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Magioladitis (talk) 06:46, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]