User talk:Fabrice Ram
Hello, Fabrice Ram, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Ahunt (talk) 14:59, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
- Introduction
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
- Frequently asked questions
- Cheatsheet
- Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
- The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
- Help pages
- Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
CS1 error on Airbus A330neo
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Airbus A330neo, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a
German Air Force
- So ALL equipment inventory of military use excessive imagees?
- That's a ridiculous thing, there ia no community guideline that is violated.What about you disruptively editing and deleting accurate informaton? You are preventing progress on this page, so it's the definition of disrupting a page ! Fabrice Ram (talk) 18:13, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- You can't say they didn't warn you! ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- Woah d000d this article suuuucks! *proceeds to rewrite several tables without any consideration, posting them in talk pages* フロップ · fL0p (er) · quaestiōnēs? 04:36, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on Euroradar CAPTOR
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Euroradar CAPTOR, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a
August 2023
In most cases for registered users, once your account is
- Hi,
- There is a misunderstanding here.
- Imagine that you're doing an article listing a certain category of something. You know that many appear in another category referencing something else... Why bothering starting from scratch when a table already contains some elements that will be used?
- That doesn't make the history of the other article relevant, and that doesn't make the copy-paste a blind copy paste. So thank ou for the remark, but I don't see at all how this would be relevant to do what you are recommending ! Fabrice Ram (talk) 03:20, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on List of wheeled self-propelled howitzer
Hello, I'm
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a
CS1 error on Archer Artillery System
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Archer Artillery System, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a
minor edits ? unsourced and biased
Reviewing your overall contributions I see that you declare most of them as minor edits. I need to point out that this aint right and is misleading. please review what a minor edit is supposed to be.
Secondly, you must provide a reference for each claim you make on a page. I see that you introduced a lot of unsourced claims on General Dynamics European Land Systems.
Thirdly, It does look like you may have been employed- paid to do this. You should identify yourself as such, declare the COI and ask others to edit, if you have such a COI. Wuerzele (talk) 14:41, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
- Not paid, the minor edits are minor edits... Fabrice Ram (talk) 16:59, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
- That's a good excuse for doing whatever you want in somewhere more of your own property... let's say a blog. You seem to like military stuff, just open your site or blog and dump all that bias there. You'll end up getting away with whatever you add there. I promise. ;) フロップ · fL0p (er) · quaestiōnēs? 04:42, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Please stop marking your edits as minor
Hello,
It seems like you've ignored @Wuerzele's suggestions and are continuing to misidentify edits as minor. These edits (645, 838, 367 bytes) are quite large and often make significant changes to the page. I'd like to remind you that minor edits are well defined; they are intended to mark spelling corrections, copyedits, minor formatting changes, and the like. They are not intended for large content changes like those in your edits.
More concerning is the apparent lack of sources for a majority of your content. I would request that you provide more accurate sources for edits in the future and retroactively source your edits when possible.
Regards, Catalyzzt (talk) 17:54, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
CS1 error on List of military transport aircraft
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of military transport aircraft, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a
7 Dec 2023
WARNING. Please do not
CS1 error on List of Airbus A350 orders and deliveries
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of Airbus A350 orders and deliveries, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a
CS1 error on List of equipment of the Swiss Army
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of equipment of the Swiss Army, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a
March 2024
- The summary table is awesome. You decided to remove it for what reason? Fabrice Ram (talk) 22:40, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- How is a section using zero references "awesome"? TylerBurden (talk) 19:37, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- It is a summary of what's below... All the references are below... Fabrice Ram (talk) 20:28, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- The information is already summarized in that section, content with two or six lines of text need to be summarized in a table? Placing it on top of the actual content that is already succinct is not in line with MOS:TABLES, it's a waste of space. TylerBurden (talk) 21:10, 13 March 2024 (UTC)]
- You are also repeatedly adding this unreliable source that uses a random Twitter user: "@T_90_M Russian main battle tank. 48 tons of steel and sex appeal. SAFO = Stalin Apologist Fellas Organisation." as its reference. Doing this with content relating to a contentious topic makes it even worse. You will be reported if you continue, so consider that a final warning. TylerBurden (talk) 21:18, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- What is your damn problem with a summary table?
- This is ridiculous ! Plus you are contradicting yourself on what the problem is...
- You are removing an old table that has been accepted for months. Are you the king of the edit?
- What space waste is it?
- Don't you think that sometimes summaries bring support in reading? Fabrice Ram (talk) 21:33, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- So now you are violating WP:RS, in particular the latter, because attempting to use "@T_90_M Russian main battle tank. 48 tons of steel and sex appeal. SAFO = Stalin Apologist Fellas Organisation." as a Wikipedia reference is the worst editing I've seen on a contentious topic in a long time and it's exactly the kind of thing that can get you topic banned if not outright blocked. TylerBurden (talk) 19:47, 14 March 2024 (UTC)]
- So now you are violating
- You are also repeatedly adding this unreliable source that uses a random Twitter user: "@T_90_M Russian main battle tank. 48 tons of steel and sex appeal. SAFO = Stalin Apologist Fellas Organisation." as its reference. Doing this with content relating to a contentious topic makes it even worse. You will be reported if you continue, so consider that a final warning. TylerBurden (talk) 21:18, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- The information is already summarized in that section, content with two or six lines of text need to be summarized in a table? Placing it on top of the actual content that is already succinct is not in line with
- It is a summary of what's below... All the references are below... Fabrice Ram (talk) 20:28, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- How is a section using zero references "awesome"? TylerBurden (talk) 19:37, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the
TylerBurden (talk) 21:08, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:03, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of equipment of the Swiss Army, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CAMM.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 1 May 2024 (UTC)