User talk:Falconhurst1967

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome

Hello, Falconhurst1967, and

welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page
, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a

help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Onorem 11:50, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Notability of
Julian T. Jackson

A tag has been placed on

criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page
explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria

BlackBear 15:57, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply
]


Message posted on Monday, April 9, 2007

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Norma Kitson. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://news.independent.co.uk/people/obituaries/article180040.ece in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows

Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Norma Kitson/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Norma Kitson
saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Your original contributions are welcome.

--Onorem 11:50, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Preview

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, it is recommended that you use the

page history. Thanks again. --Geniac 19:15, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Image copyright problem with Image:Albert_Ernest.jpg

Thanks for uploading

copyright tag
, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:55, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Albert Ernest Kitson

Hi - The {{

OR}} tag was, perhaps, too hasty. However, the article still contains many sections that draw conclusions from the available facts, which is unencyclopaedic. As you appear to be vested in the article, I'm more than happy to give you time to whittle it down yourself. The same would go for Roderick Kedward, and your other lengthier (albeit thorough) contributions. - Tiswas(t/c) 14:19, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

I've reverted your recent blanking - this is considered vandalism, even if the blanking is committed by the original contributor. Rather than a perfunctory deletion of all that you have written, why not engage in an informed defense of your edits. - Tiswas(t/c) 15:38, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Two World Wars, One World Cup

Thank you for experimenting with the page

welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. - Tiswas(t/c) 14:23, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

April 2007

talk 15:34, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Copyright

Wikipedia articles are created under the

GPL. As such, by creating an article, you are effectively permitting its irrevocable and perpetual use on this, and other, sites. Although IANAL. It would be nice if you would reconsider your position - Tiswas(t/c) 15:42, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Albert Ernest Kitson

Albert Ernest Kitson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox
. Thank you.

Vandalism of
Albert Ernest Kitson

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --Savant13 16:09, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Everton F.C.

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SenorKristobbal 21:14, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

unreferencedBLP
}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Roderick "Rod" Kedward (historian) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Julian T. Jackson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Martin Thomas - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Jill Kitson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:52, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Clive Emsley for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clive Emsley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clive Emsley until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 17:42, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]