User talk:Fephisto
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Fephisto
Thank you for creating
Thanks for the redirect!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:19, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
"Elifism" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Elifism and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 24#Elifism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 18:51, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
Appreciation for your NATO edits
Hey Fephisto,
Just came by to your page to say thanks for your clarification on the North Atlantic Treaty Organization talk page, including the Cuban Missile Crisis and the recent Poland Missile Strike. Keep it up mate.
Happy Holidays, MateoFrayo (talk) 01:32, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
CS1 error on Yakhchāl
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Yakhchāl, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a
Citations in the lead
Hello, and thanks for addressing the [citation needed] tag on Night of the Living Dead. I'm responding here to a question you posed in your edit summary: "Including citation near the top instead of just eliminating citation needed and shoving a comment in the edit history where nobody can see it. This is on the front page of Wikipedia atm, so it'd be nice for folks to more conveniently see where this is sourced from. Also, aren't citations supposed to be right next to the claim instead of buried in a subsection?
"
Citations in the lead aren't typically required by Wikipedia policies or guidelines because the top (lead) section is meant to summarize the rest of the cited content. Per
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review