User talk:Fiction2Facts

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Carpimaps was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

All of the citations besides Effie Pakistan is connected to the subject or does not mention this person at all. We need sources that give a lot of coverage However, I am not sure if Effie Pakistan is reliable. You can go ask at

WP:RSN

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Muhammad Usama Qureshi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

talk to me! 08:17, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, Fiction2Facts! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the talk to me! 08:17, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply ]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Docentation (talk) 18:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly suggest you respond at that noticeboard if you want to keep your editing privileges. The specific thread is Ishaq Dar: edit warring and potential sockpuppetry --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 00:12, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please look into the vandalism going on unabated in the mentioned article:

1. After I am blocked, federal ministries of His Excellency Ishaq Dar have been name-distorted by Docentation to first, second and third Sharif ministry. This is unlawful and tantamount to character assassination as he is Federal Minister of Finance & Revenue of Pakistan.
2. The aforementioned editor has deleted another 11,000+ characters after they deleted 7,000+ characters yesterday. They have deleted 18,000 characters.

This is unlawful to say the least. The Government of Pakistan should take notice of the mala-fide & bona-fide vandalism. Please look into it. Fiction2Facts (talk) 09:50, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Fiction2Facts, please see
  WP:NLT. Any further insinuation that other editors' conduct is illegal, or that it should be looked into by outside authorities, will lead to an immediate site-wide block. Abecedare (talk) 21:25, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]

  I request that we get back to the version before the deletion of 11,000+ and 7,000+ characters; and, discuss and edit point to point to preserve a very important article that affects millions around the world. Fiction2Facts (talk) 05:08, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  There’s nothing preventing you from, even at this juncture, making a specific argument based on Wikipedia policy about a specific part of my edits. You’ve been invited repeatedly to do that. You clearly aren’t going to have the revert made in one go before actually giving the promised substantive argument, so why not make it now? Docentation (talk) 14:06, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I appreciate it. I need to be unblocked though. Fiction2Facts (talk) 15:12, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Fiction2Facts, you are blocked from the Ishaq Dar article. You are still able and welcome to edit Talk:Ishaq Dar, where you can raise objections to other editor's edits or propose your own. Try to be specific though, as in "Please restore the sentence X because Y", where Y is based on some source, grammar or presentation issues, or wikipedia policy. Just arguing for restoration to your preferred version because the "article affects millions around the world" isn't helpful. Abecedare (talk) 15:33, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]