User talk:Filipz123

Filipz123, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Filipz123! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016

Hello, I'm

edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:21, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Please do not blank pages, as you did to

Dactyloscopy with this edit, because it is considered vandalism; instead, use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see here for what to do. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:08, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 05:50, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use Lulu.com books as references on this wiki. See

WP:RS. Materialscientist (talk) 06:01, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

MOS:BLPLEAD). Tesla's primary residence/place of invention was the USA. Thank you. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 20:29, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

talk) 21:23, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 07:20, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Rimac Concept One was designed and is manufactured in Croatia but electric cars were invented over 100 years ago. Please stop adding it to the 'Croatian inventions' category because this car is not an invention - -Croatian or otherwise. Stepho talk 10:27, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

this is becoming too much

moved from my talk page Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 00:54, 3 October 2016 (UTC) ..Why do you have so much hate in your heart for me? I never really did anything wrong to begin with. I was a new editor and I tried to convey my research. Why am I portrayed as this evil entity terrorizing Wikipedia with adding sourced information to invention related history? Even if some of my information is wrong, can it not be discussed, several points tossed on the table like civil people? It seems like you and a few other users genuinely hate another human being due to his Balkan edits on Wikipedia, all which were sourced and researched? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.114.73.190 (talk) 13:55, 2 October 2016 (UTC) Also please, in all honesty, human to human, answer me this: how long until ANYBODY is able to add ANYTHING to the Balkan in relation to invention or discovery history again? How long until some random person can read the hair clipper article, see the credit to Bizumić, and add it to the invention Category without being labeled a sock? Because in all fairness, the unnecessary hate for me as if I've defiled your home, is stepping in the way of credit for an entire cultural region. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.114.73.190 (talk) 14:02, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Community ban

Per closed discussion here. Appeal options outlined at

WP:CUBL. -- Euryalus (talk

) 08:02, 6 November 2016 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Filipz123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17123 was submitted on Dec 15, 2016 01:05:59. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 01:05, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Filipz123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello. I understand I have been slightly infamous. I also understand I should wait 6 months before appealing, but anything I say now I would say in 6 months as well. I have grown, and it saddens me to see that the only reason which my plethora of information added to the Balkan region, invention categlries and learned SINCE my Filipz123 account is not accepted onto wikipedia, is because of my name. My name was stained when I was an amature and edit warred with a couple of editors rather than using wikipedia resources to get my point across. The reason being, I was not very familiar with wikipedia software and some of the edits I took personally so it was the only way I knew to behave at the time. This was over half a year ago. I got myself blocked. As I am not a native speaker of English and still do not know all words, I lead myself to believe that indefinitely meant.. essentially 'definitely' to which I attempted to come back as another account and try again in a better manner, but since I edited the same articles as Filipz123, I got pinned for sock puppetry which I knew nothing about. Since then I have had an argumentative nature with about 6 editors who are preventing me from editing. I would like to say, I understand that wikipedia is a society and needs to be kept under rules and regulations to function. So I completely condone and support the actions of the few editors who are working to keep me away. They treat all violators with the same nature. That being said, my information is good. It regularly gets accepted by the community until one of those editors finds it. Since my block, the region of the Balkan has been prevented from having anything added to it. I understand at times my information is wrong or seems POV. If I am unblocked, I will gladly discuss and work to improve those edits with the community. No more edit wars. If my edit is removed, I take it to talk and administration will deal with it. I have been noticing editors who are not me, blocked and reverted for being me simply for adding an invention to Serbia. I believe this is counter productive. I intend to greatly contribute to articles pertaining to the Balkan. Editors have called me a nationalist for it which I find very offensive as there are many editors only editing a specific region, one even got an award for significantly contributing to Bulgaria. I would ALSO like to organize and clean up the invention categories. There are countries which have human beings under inventions, and when I tried to remove, it was from my IP range and I got pinned for sock puppetry and reverted. Like I said, highly unproductive. I wish to write articles which I have written and had accepted by the community until one of the editors who know my case found it. I would like a chance to share all I have to offer while working with all of you to perfect my edits. The invention categories need clean up and the Balkan region needs to be freed of these edit sanctions imposed on me. I have not appealed before, but I needed to grow and learn, I needed to understand how the society works and I will gladly comply if allowed back. Please give me a second and final chance. I will even comply with being monitored for a time if need be, whatever the following procedures may be. I have a lot to offer, and I have a lot to clean up which is currently being overlooked. I would like to be given the chance to civily do so. Please consider it, I won't let you down. Filipz123 (talk) 11:50, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

What I'm seeing is an overwhelming Community ban from Wikipedia, recorded here, so no individual admin could unblock even if they wanted to. On top of that we have dozens of socks at SPI including as recently as yesterday. And then, in addition to all the on-wiki disruption, I've seen evidence of some pretty nasty off-wiki stalking and harassment. Add to that the feigned innocence in this unblock request and below, and all I can conclude is that we have an unrepentant troll here. Talk page and email access have now been revoked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:49, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If any admin considering this request would like to see screenshots of the threats of violence this user has emailed me recently, you know where the email form is. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 13:32, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? Id like to see these emails if you are talking about me this is blasphemous Filipz123 (talk) 15:20, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is sick. How can you just falsely accuse me of threatening you. I don't even have your email? I contacted you by Facebook a long time ago and civily stated my case to which you blocked me and I have had no way to contact you since. I have those msgs and are clearly far from threats or even uncivil Filipz123 (talk) 15:35, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have asked Ivanvector to forward me the alleged email, which I think I would need to see before I could consider this unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:43, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I should add that I don't mean to prevent any other admin from reviewing the request - please do go ahead if you feel able, although this is a community ban. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:50, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to see them as well as I am the accused. I would like to see the content wnd which email it was sent from. I really would not like if I was being impersonated Filipz123 (talk) 15:45, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If it was me and my email he could have me charged...why would I threaten? Filipz123 (talk) 15:46, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Amanda (aka DQ) 16:14, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply

]