User talk:Fliry Vorru

		The College football Barnstar
		For all you do to support college football and for never getting anything more than light applause, I award to the entire Wikipedia:WikiProject Marching band the College football barnstar. College football would not be the same without you.--Paul McDonald (talk) 13:35, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Fliry Vorru, and

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

Thank you for your effort to cleanup this article. However, upon closer review, Activemusician.com cannot be used as a source for this article, since all it does is mirror the Wikipedia article. For greater explanation, please see

No problem, regarding reverting that Troy "controversy". I haven't been active on the article lately, but I edited it a bit when it was back in its stub stage and its still on my watchlist. I grew up in southeast Alabama and both my parents are Troy alumni, so there's a bit of a connection there for me. AUTiger » talk 03:05, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Even if Chuck Norris was inducted at Gamma, he'd have to be registered with Nationals, and he's not on the prominent members list. We had the same issue with Dave Chappelle being voted in by a chapter (Central State) but not confirmed. — BrotherFlounder 03:15, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am willing to accept your word on Chuck Norris, but

I suggest that you add an image of his shingle to the article, in the prominent members section. (The article does need more images, after all!) As a side notes, do you know that this is THE Chuck Norris, as opposed to some student who happens to have the same name (it does happen), and also, how did you get a picture of his shingle? Cmadler 10:29, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I undid your edit from August 26 that again added Chuck Norris to the Prominent Members section of the article. Reiterating what Cmadler said, I think we would all be willing to take your word for it, but until it is cited from a reliable source, it can't be in the article. Verybigfish86 06:27, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been invited to join the WikiProject Ice Hockey. We are dedicated to improving the San Jose Sharks-related articles on Wikipedia. You received this invitation due to your interest in San Jose Sharks and/or your many edits to San Jose Sharks articles. If you would like to join, please visit the task force page , and add your name to the list of active project members. Thank you. LegoKontribsTalkM 04:22, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that this task force is still unofficial, and I would like to have at least five members before asking for approval from

Thanks for signing up, and now it is official at Wikipedia:WikiProject Ice Hockey/San Jose Sharks task force. Thanks LegoK^ontribsT^alkM 04:22, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A whole bunch of us trying to get vandals.... we stumble over each other all the time... I lost count how many times I have made a mess ;-) So no worries and keep having fun stomping on vandals. ;-) --CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 17:42, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this edit, it was not vandalism as you accuse in this edit summary. I noticed the category redlinks and removed them as a courtesy, thinking that the categories had been deleted or had never been created. This is not an uncommon practice here as Wikipedia even has bots to perform such housekeeping. As far as I know, there is no Wikipedia policy that prohibits you from including your user page in non-existent categories, so the fact that you reverted my edit is fine. The fact that you accused me of vandalism is not. Wikipedia is a community and things like that are divisive. Please read

I don't make a habit out of going into other peoples' houses and "fixing" things such as lining up their wall art or dusting their mantle. Therefore, I find someone coming into my User Page, this tiny corner of Wikipedia that I call my home, and "fixing" things up rather vandalistic. Fliry Vorru (talk) 21:35, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I guess that's the difference between you and me. If I'm at someone's house and the door to their fridge doesn't quite shut or a glass is precariously near the edge of a table or the faucet didn't get completely shut off and I happen by, I'll take a moment to help out. So far, no one has filed charges with the authorities, accusing me of vandalizing their property.

While you apparently still fail to understand or choose to ignore

WP:AGF, I'll steer clear of your little corner of Wikipedia. →Wordbuilder (talk) 21:58, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Oh, and reporting editors for non-vandalism doesn't make their "Wikipedia life hellish", it just makes admins wonder what you're getting so worked up about. →Wordbuilder (talk) 22:05, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your opinions and advice. Enjoy your Wikipedia and have a nice day. Fliry Vorru (talk) 01:07, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I see you have recently created one or more new stub types. As it states at

Thanks for uploading Image:2005 Atlantic hurricane season.ogg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:12, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the correction. I was scanning the page to see if anything was out of place and that was the only organization that doesn't have a page built on Wiki--plus I was tracking the changes made by an anon IP that had been associated with vandalism. That's what I get for assuming. Maybe someone should create a page on it since it is an oddly-named group and probably has lots of members.Atlantabravz (talk) 11:51, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Would you consider adding any input to our proposal regarding the DSM-IV. Input is being collected on our talk page. Thanks! Mindsite (talk) 22:10, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A

]

Invite

As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject University of Florida, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of University of Florida. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks!

Jccort (talk) 12:26, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• I am glad you can help out in the University of Florida-Student Housing section, we are in desperate need of improving this article. We need picture, specifications, the whole enchalada. Jccort (talk) 20:02, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the line you dropped on my talk page. Just letting you know I replied there. I imagine you saw it, but just making sure.Ufuncecu (talk) 04:01, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedian! I just wanted to let you know that list of participants, check out our to-do list, and most importantly, improve the articles !

--

Hey, thanks for adding the article about the Pride of Acadiana. I had been meaning to create one, but I kept putting it off! Also, are you a Sinfonian? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcarriere (talk • contribs) 06:25, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1. Wes Bizilia - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Ralph Ford - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 01:51, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ralph Ford is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ralph Ford until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jrcla2 (talk) 14:43, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings!

Seeing that you're a member of

If you're able and inclined to come, please RSVP at at this URL.

Type to you later, Vincent J. Lipsio (talk) 20:47, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, just wondering if you're still planning to record an audio file for the Supermassive black hole article as per the Spoken Wikipedia recording list. If you're no longer interested or have already recorded the article, feel free to remove yourself from the list or ask me to do so on my talk page. The article may be removed from the list of in-progress articles if no action is taken. If you have already recorded the article and would like any help editing the audio, please contact any of the users listed here. For general help, please leave a message here. Thank you. You can remove this notice at any time.

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Band Association Hall of Fame of Distinguished Band Conductors is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Band Association Hall of Fame of Distinguished Band Conductors until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:18, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sound of the South Logo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the
  CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
  ) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
  here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending
  }} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 06:24, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]