User talk:Freshmutt

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome to the Wikipedia!

Guantanamo Bay page. Hope you enjoy editing here and becoming a Wikipedian
! Here are some perfunctory tips to hasten your acculturation into the Wikipedia experience:

Some odds and ends:

Wikiquette
, and you can sign your name on any page by typing 4 tildes: ~~~~.

Best of luck, Freshmutt, and have fun! Ombudsman 19:08, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Innyrds.jpg

Thanks for uploading

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our

talk) 17:19, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
]


Fair use rationale for Image:1795 flowing hair dollar obverse.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1795 flowing hair dollar obverse.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:11, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Fair use rationale for Image:1795 flowing hair dollar reverse.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1795 flowing hair dollar reverse.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:11, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sources,
WP:BURDEN

Per

WP:BURDEN, when another editor challenges your addition because of lack of sourcing, it is the editor inserting the material that is responsible for finding a source and adding the source to the article. Do not restore unsourced material to articles after it has been challenged. In this case, I'll dredge the damn source up myself to avoid edit warring, but do not repeat this behaviour in the future: when another editor removes material you had added, don't just put it back because you don't think it's your job to provide sources. It is always the inserting editor's job to locate and provide the source.—Kww(talk) 03:07, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Actually, I've just searched, and I can't find a reliable source that describes them as "blue-eyed soul". CDUniverse.com provides user reviews that describe them that way, but they don't pass
WP:RS. Amazon provides user reviews that describe them that way, but we can't use user reviews on Amazon as sources. There are a lot of Wikipedia mirrors that describe them that way, but we can't use Wikipedia or Wikipedia mirrors as sources. There are a lot of blogs that describe them that way, but we can't use blogs as sources. There are a lot of fan-sites that describe them that way, but we can't use fan-sites as sources. I'll remove them from the list Monday morning if you haven't located a reliable source by then.—Kww(talk) 03:17, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply
]