User talk:Gagalandro

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at American Horror Story: Apocalypse, you may be blocked from editing. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 19:45, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Always Remember Us This Way. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 11:32, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Always Remember Us This Way, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 15:18, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 10:31, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently you are saying that File:Lady Gaga - Always Remember Us This Way - cover.png is not the official cover. Please back up your claim with some evidence, preferably on the article's talk page. The current image has a source, although it is not a very high quality one, so you should come up with some supporting argument instead of just reverting. Edit warring can lead to blocks. —Kusma (t·c) 14:26, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Shallow (Lady Gaga and Bradley Cooper song). —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 11:19, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:23, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to

Hello, I am sorry and I will not do it again. But the single cover that is shown on "Always Remember Us This Way" is not the official at all, it’s a fan-made cover and I don’t think Wikipedia usually shares that kind of unofficial informations. I don’t know how to remove it, but don’t worry I won’t try again. The only thing that you need to understand is this needs to stop and to be totally deleted from Wikipedia. This is a shame to show something as false, fake and wrong as this is on Wikipedia. It means that everybody can add whatever they want wherever they want. I beg you to delete this image from the page because this is not right. Thank you. Gagalandro (talk) 11:02, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Lady Gaga discography, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 08:45, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Zach Villa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ... discospinster _talk 02:35, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information. You've been warned before not to insert fabrications, now please refrain from those. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 01:28, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alexf^(talk) 13:31, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. livelikemusic (TALK!) 22:45, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Your ignorance of MOS policies is tiring. Do it again, and you will be reported for it. livelikemusic (TALK!) 22:02, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Chromatica; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jalen Folf (talk) 22:07, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll lay it out simple - until the RM is over, you do not edit war over the song titles at Chromatica. You do, you get blocked. Primefac (talk) 22:45, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of two weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 22:55, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 17:38, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop disregarding the status of The Fame Monster as an extended play. It was not released as a separate studio album after The Fame. Mediafanatic17 (talk) 16:41, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I mean I literally gave the source with each page from Gaga’s contract with Interscope. The lie that C2C is LG4 and TFM just an EP has been going around Wikipedia for years this has to be fixed. Her team and herself never called it an EP it was only Billboard and the streaming platforms that calls it that but otherwise every add for TFM, everything that has to do with the promo was focusing on "brand new album" and never acknowledged "EP". I’ve been trying to fix that for a long time but it’s you all’s issue now. As well as C2C doesn’t count as Gaga’s albums with Interscope therefore it’s not her fourth studio album. Gagalandro (talk) 17:46, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"I would not add, nor take away any songs from this EP. It is a complete conceptual and musical body of work that can stand on its own two feet. It doesn't need The Fame."--Lady Gaga. This was already discussed 10 years ago.

(CC) Tbhotch^™ 00:09, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:09, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. Please read the guidelines on what is generally considered to be a reliable source. Sricsi (talk) 17:01, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]