User talk:Galkaha

Wikipedia is here to provide an encyclopedia, collecting content that third party reliable sources have found worthy of discussion. Period. I am sure the organization does wonderful things, but until there is third party coverage, they dont get an article. And as long as you dont have the third party source significant coverage hurdle met, you are wasting your time,'' because EVEN IF an administrator temporarily restores the content, unless you have the sources, ITS GONNA GET DELETED AGAIN. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 02:54, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Even if that's true, nothing refrain an user to retrieve content he wrote if it got deleted. Galkaha, just click on a username on the page I gave you, and ask for the content of your article on his talk page. Amqui (talk) 03:18, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Galkaha. We

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

• Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
• Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
• Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
• Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see

Hello! Galkaha, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!

I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have! 
SarahStierch (talk) 05:49, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Thank you! I will keep working on improving the article. Thank you for giving it a green light Galkaha (talk) 20:03, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adopt-a-Pet.com is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adopt-a-Pet.com until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Light21 16:27, 18 September 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Light2021 (talk • contribs)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

This submission reads more like an

encyclopedic manner

.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This reads more like someone's essay on the topic, and also gives "how to" advice.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Clustering standard errors and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 03:30, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Galkaha. It has been over six months since you last edited the