User talk:GeneralNotability/Archives/2019/June

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hi Creffett, I saw you tagged my draft of David Assia's page for deletion. I am trying to understand the reasons behind it. I have invested a lot of time on the first draft to neutralize the voice of the content and make it as Wikipedia and friendly as possible. I am aware that it is not the easiest thing to make a page non-biased or promotional when it comes to people pages, this individual is as iconic for the high-tech startup scene as George Lucas is to movies. I would love to get your input and improve the page. Please get back to me. Jbzk17 (talk) 12:59, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

15:24, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi can you help me in this matter it looks like same user is using multiple accounts and editing pages like Chhota Bheem and Rajiv Chilaka. Regards. Sid95Q (talk) 15:59, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

@

talk

) 16:02, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

@Sid95Q: I've dug into this...and I'm wondering if there are two different groups of socks. Here's my initial guesses:

Group 1: Anti-Rajiv Chilaka (accuses him and his works of copying Dragon Ball Z and others):

• Chhotachotabheem (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
• AkbarKumar (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
• Dragonballzzz (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Pretty sure these three are all related - extremely similar edits and reverts.

Group 2: pro-Rajiv Chilaka (posts that several films did poorly, but that Chilaka's work was great):

• Lapudi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
• BehenShivani (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - almost certainly related to User:Lapudi based on popping up to revert your revert and having no other contributions
• InduChutkiLesboLesbo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - almost certainly related to User:Lapudi, same rationale as above
• SemenLapudi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - possible, less certain
• ManasiAhujaSharma (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
• SrinivassssLapudi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
• RamzanMubarak (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
• AdhaBulliKutRamzaanMubarak (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - probably a sock of the above

Thoughts?

talk

) 17:13, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Interesting. Well done . could be 2 different users but a revert here [7] still makes be believe that it's the same user. Sid95Q (talk) 17:25, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

@

talk

) 17:27, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for your work. I understand this was not the place place to host a draft and the quality of the draft and its presentation were not up to par. I've opened a draft in my sandbox. As a graduate student affiliated with this project, I want to write an article WRSP. The project is important for getting scholars to generate encyclopedic content on religious groups that are usually represented either by their supporters or detractors. It's already used as a source on multiple wikipedia articles and I think that it would be good for wikipedia to include an article on the project so that, when used as a source, it is possible for them to learn more about it.

There seems to have been concerns over copyright. How should I show that the person responsible for the site gives me permission to use some of its content? Also, especially since I am affiliated with the project, I want to avoid sounding like I'm promoting it. The first draft was a bit too much in the 'saying what we need to say' rather than 'saying what people want to hear' direction, but I mean to rewrite it so that it's more in line with wiki standards.

Thank you --Dussault (talk) 15:07, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

@

talk

) 15:45, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2019).

Administrator changes

Andonic • Consumed Crustacean • Enigmaman • Euryalus • EWS23 • HereToHelp • Nv8200pa • Peripitus • StringTheory11 • Vejvančický

CheckUser changes

Ivanvector

Guideline and policy news

• An
  WP:OUTING
  should include information on just the English Wikipedia or any Wikimedia project.
• An RfC on WT:RfA concluded that Requests for adminship and bureaucratship are discussions seeking to build consensus.
• An RfC proposal to make the templates for discussion (TfD) process more like the requested moves (RM) process, i.e. "as a clearinghouse of template discussions", was closed as successful.

Technical news

• The CSD feature of
  Twinkle now allows admins to notify page creators of deletion if the page had not been tagged. The default behavior matches that of tagging notifications, and replaces the ability to open the user talk page upon deletion. You can customize which criteria receive notifications in your Twinkle preferences
  : look for Notify page creator when deleting under these criteria.
• Twinkle's d-batch (batch delete) feature now supports deleting subpages (and related redirects and talk pages) of each page. The pages will be listed first but use with caution! The und-batch (batch undelete) option can now also restore talk pages.

Miscellaneous

• The previously discussed unblocking of IP addresses indefinitely-blocked before 2009 was approved and has taken place.
• The 2019 talk pages consultation produced a report for Phase 1 and has entered Phase 2.

Hello !! I just finished watching the recent documentary about the Qantas incident. I am not an expert with Wikipedia. Can you please show me how it should be done. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.101.233.181 (talk) 02:46, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Here is the documentary, if you think it is good enough for your encyclopaedia:

https://www.youtube.com/redirect?q=https%3A%2F%2F7news.com.au%2Fsunday-night%2Fcaptain-kevin-sullivan-saves-315-people-on-board-qf72-c-138996&redir_token=1B8kDTGnvLfoJ2C8cZiXWPEdY_d8MTU2MDEzNjgwMEAxNTYwMDUwNDAw&event=video_description&v=0cS1SMptlnQ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.101.233.181 (talk) 03:32, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Dear Creffett

The page I am writing about a fashion brand ANIFA has been deleted (Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:ANIFA&action=edit&redlink=1) The description and content has been very neutral with all references from reputable newspapers and media. Would you please advise how to make this approved instead of just delete the page? I have spent a lot of time writing it and finding all the references, I appreciate your help in getting this right.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Webmasterking (talk • contribs) 08:00, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

17:06, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi Creffett, this individual is a very important person for the high-tech industry as I mentioned before. Please suggest how to word this article in a way that will suit Wikipedia. Jbzk17 (talk) 13:56, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi Creffett, my query pertains to the deletion of links I added to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Ambisonic_software Could you please let me know why I cannot add links to open source ambisonics software to a page which explicitly lists free/open source ambisonics software. The formatting was inline with all other links on the page. Or did I miss something here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leomccormack (talk • contribs) 13:15, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Hey mate, Thanks for reviewing my edited article under Wedding Photography. I'm wondering why you deleted everything I wrote. The previous text under "Profession" was so boring and outdated, I wanted to write some new relevant content there. Sorry for the link too, but i wanted to give readers an idea or inspiration of what a wedding photographers website "should" look like to help them market their business. Looking forward to hearing from you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChrisGarbacz (talk • contribs) 20:51, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

@

talk

) 20:55, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

	The Civility Barnstar
	Thank you for the help :) Sid95Q (talk) 20:52, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at the Dambusters, and Hawkeye7 at Allied code breakers and Australia in New Guinea and Vietnam Op-ed: TomStar81 on the treaty that ended World War I

I am a unpaid intern working with the pittsburgh knights. I was asked to work on the wikipedia page for them. This is the first time creating a page on wiki. I accidently clicked the piad to edit button when creating. That is my fault. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BlaineA73 (talk • contribs) 15:26, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

20:37, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Dear Creffett,

my page was deleted and i dont quite understand as the same content was not deleted earlier for this reason but for only inadequate sources. i also edited the page content based on other top institution's page that has been approved. can you advise why the page was deleted and i would like to retrieve the data to improvise and resubmit again. appreciate your input. thank you Raj2828 (talk) 02:51, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

@

talk

) 12:58, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Dear Creffett,

thanks for controlling new pages and for your welcome! I saw you tagged my draft of Vitesy page for deletion, the scope of the article is not promotional, I think that the organization is innovating the smart home IoT world and deserves to be mentioned as one of the biggest innovators in the market of air purification as a green organization that use plants to purify indoor air instead of HEPA filters, I would like to have your feedback on why it is promotional and how to improve the page so that it can be published without infringing any of the WP guidelines.

Thank you so much!

Edoardo.Canella (talk) 13:44, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Respected Sir, Regarding the deletion tag which you have attached to my sandbox, I have given my explanation to the concerned deletors and they gave me the advice to make corrections in my writing. I have done those corrections and rewritten my sandbox by avoiding any advertisement and exaggeration. Previously I had written a big article but this time after receiving the advice I had written only three lines which were factual (you may check accordingly). But your authority has again placed the speedy deletion tag due which my article was deleted. Please inform what are the lacunas which have remained now? I will try to improve that. If you have any objection on particular line you may tell accordingly on my talk page. This time I have already referred to existing wikipedia pages of Indian Guinness World Record Holders. I hope the page I am going to submit is more notable. Please inform. Thanks. MA$HRVA (Talk) Write Right!! 04:50, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

TonyBallioni (talk) 05:26, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

@

talk

) 12:20, 20 June 2019 (UTC)