User talk:Genijamzo

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeff Lestz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 15:51, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Genijamzo! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 15:51, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks Kylie!

I will have a closer look and update it in line with the help desk suggestions Genijamzo (talk) 13:23, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kyle

Trust that everything is good with you!

Can you please advice if official references such as this one is well looked upon and a good thing to include?

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05487537/officers

Cheers! Genijamzo (talk) 18:23, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission is not adequately supported by

Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Twitter and Amazon aren't considered reliable sources. Please fix that. Best regards, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 21:45, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeff Lestz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 21:45, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bbb23 (talk) 22:57, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bbb23 - I just had another note from --Johannes who advised that i should remove the links from Amazon and titter which I have done now.

Why would you delete this and any suggestions that I can do/change? Genijamzo (talk) 23:13, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for the help --Johannes btw! Genijamzo (talk) 23:14, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your messages. You have an obvious

• When you write about a person, you must provide
  independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines
  . Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.

• There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
• You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in
  this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here
  ; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Thanks Jimfbleak

This is very helpful and I did go all in on the references which I also assumed could come across differently than intended.

Makes a lot of sense and thanks for taking the time to share.

Cheers Genijamzo (talk) 19:54, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]