User talk:Geo Swan/archive/2014-12

This user is one of the 800 most active English Wikipedians of all time.

If you are considering initiating an xfd on material I started

2004, 2005, 2006-01--2006-06, 2006-07--2006-10, 2006-10--2005-12, 2007-01--2007-06, 2007-07--2007-09, 2007-10--2007-12, 2008-01--2008-06, 2008-07--2008-09, 2008-10--2008-12, 2009-01--2009-03, 2009-04--2009-06, 2009-07--2009-09, 2009-10--2009-12, 2010-01, 2010-02, 2010-03, 2010-04, 2010-05, 2010-06, 2010-07, 2010-08, 2010-09, 2010-10, 2010-11, 2010-12, 2011-01, 2011-02, 2011-03, 2011-04, 2011-05, 2011-06, 2011-07, 2011-08, 2011-09, 2011-10, 2011-11, 2011-12, 2012-01, 2012-02, 2012-03, 2012-04, 2012-05, 2012-06, 2012-07, 2012-08, 2012-09, 2012-10, 2012-11, 2012-12, 2013-01, 2013-02, 2013-03, 2013-04, 2013-05, 2013-06, 2013-07, 2013-08, 2013-09, 2013-10, 2013-11, 2013-12, 2014-01, 2014-02, 2014-03, 2014-04, 2014-05, 2014-06, 2014-07, 2014-08, 2014-09, 2014-10, 2014-11, 2014-12, 2015-01, 2015-02, 2015-03, 2015-04, 2015-05, 2015-06, 2015-07, 2015-08, 2015-09, 2015-10, 2015-11, 2015-12, 2016-01, 2016-02, 2016-03, 2016-04, 2016-05, 2016-06, 2016-07, 2016-08, 2016-09, 2016-10, 2016-11, 2016-12, 2017-01, 2017-02, 2017-03, 2017-04, 2017-05, 2017-06, 2017-07, 2017-08, 2017-09, 2017-10, 2017-11, 2017-12, 2018-01, 2018-02, 2018-03, 2018-04, 2018-05, 2018-06, 2018-07, 2018-08, 2018-09, 2018-10, 2018-11, 2018-12, 2019-01, 2019-02, 2019-03, 2019-04, 2019-05, 2019-06, 2019-07, 2019-08, 2019-09, 2019-10, 2019-11, 2019-12, 2020-01, 2020-02, 2020-03, 2020-04, 2020-05, 2020-06, 2020-07, 2020-08, 2020-09, 2020-10, 2020-11, User Talk:Geo Swan/archive/list

Ayodhya Bombing suspects

Greetings. In my attempt at cleaning up the article about the 2005 attack on the Ramjanmabhoomi site, I came across these articles that you began;

Irfan Khan (Ayodhya bombing suspect). At the time, I can well understand why you created the articles; however, it now seems like the cases died a quiet death, and I can't seem to find any reference to them after 2006. The few online pages I found are copied from Wikipedia. Therefore, I think the time has come to get rid of them. I saw your notice, but it seems like you aren't the only contributor to the articles; so, I have PROD'd them both. If you have any objection, or if you find more material, or something, go ahead and remove the PRODs, and I'd be happy to discuss them. Regards, Vanamonde93 (talk) 07:33, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

I think these two articles measured up to the wikipedia's standards of 2006, but, as you suggested, they do not measure up to the wikipedia's current, mor demanding, standards. Rather than delete them, I am going to redirect them to
2005 Ram Janmabhoomi attack in Ayodhya
. This was the main article you referred to, wasn't it?

I think this is preferable to deletion, as it keeps the revision history available, and makes the references uses accessible for recycling in other articles.

Thanks for your note.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 16:51, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That works just as well, if not better. Yes, that was indeed the main article. I do not fault the creation in any way; our standards have risen, but that news story also died a quiet death, and nobody seems to know what happened to these people after 2006. Thanks for responding so promptly, Cheers, Vanamonde93 (talk) 17:08, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Asif Iqbal (Ayodhya bombing suspect)

The article

Asif Iqbal (Ayodhya bombing suspect) has been proposed for deletion

because of the following concern:

The coverage currently available merely says that he was arrested in connection with the bombing; there is no in-depth coverage of this individual of any kind, and the article currently seems to fail

WP:BIO Vanamonde93 (talk) 07:33, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vanamonde93 (talk) 07:33, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirected, as per my reply, @ #Ayodhya Bombing suspects. Geo Swan (talk) 17:11, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Irfan Khan (Ayodhya bombing suspect)

The article

Irfan Khan (Ayodhya bombing suspect) has been proposed for deletion

because of the following concern:

The coverage currently available merely says that he was arrested in connection with the bombing; there is no in-depth coverage of this individual of any kind, and the article currently seems to fail

WP:BIO Vanamonde93 (talk) 07:33, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vanamonde93 (talk) 07:33, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirected, as per my reply, @ #Ayodhya Bombing suspects. Geo Swan (talk) 17:11, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Omar Khadr image from video leaked to CBS.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the
Stefan2 (talk) 00:28, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Disambiguation link notification for December 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sentinel-class cutter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WLRN. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done Geo Swan (talk) 01:42, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

test

test — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aliceba (talk • contribs) 00:38, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

5 x 5 Geo Swan (talk) 01:17, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Steve Munro for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steve Munro is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Munro until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mrfrobinson (talk) 20:52, 23 March 2014 (UTC) 16:44, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No one agreed with this nominator. He or she got defensive when I requested a greater effort to comply with
WP:BEFORE. Geo Swan (talk) 11:21, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Orphaned non-free image File:Turkish ads use a hairy and disheveled KSM.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the
Stefan2 (talk) 22:13, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

The image had been removed by an SPA, and, I suspect, a sockpuppet. Geo Swan (talk) 11:22, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mapping tool issue 13 Dec 2014

Link not working or valid 13 Dec 2014 Hi Geo Swan. You referred to this tool http://www.aquarius.geomar.de/omc/ when you created Kingman Reef orthographic map - excellent map but there is an issue with the tool - Is is still about but a different link? Does Wikipedia still want this colour scheme or have they switched to Grey/ green?
Thanks (LawrieM (talk) 09:36, 13 December 2014 (UTC))

I used the tool to create about 200 maps, without really paying attention to who funded that site.

I was extremely disappointed when it went away, without warning, about 5 years ago.

The guys behind the site had wrapped a surprisingly easy to use interface around some gnarly tools, tools that are free and that are still available for download, online. But the download is big, and it is all command line based, with multiple steps, and with many complicated options. Geo Swan (talk) 14:35, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Toronto Express

Media related to Toronto Express (ship, 2003) at Wikimedia Commons
You seem to have an interest in ships and have created a few articles along with numerous pictures taken by you in the harbour. Did you know there was a ship named Toronto Express? Secondarywaltz (talk) 04:15, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

re: Complying with WP:BEFORE...

Thank you for your message however you seem to forget
WP:AGF and have a very confrontational position on my XfD. You should consider that at face value my nomination was in good faith as Steve Munro does not and did not appear to meet the requirements for an author to be notable on Wikipedia. I stand by my nomination and ask that you tone your accusations down ESPECIALLY when you are involved as the creator of the article. Mrfrobinson (talk) 20:52, 23 March 2014 (UTC) 19:23, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

I replied back at User talk:Mrfrobinson. Geo Swan (talk) 02:14, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rolando Sarraff Trujillo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defence Intelligence Agency. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Priyanka Chopra edit

What I did was move the citation to where the text was, just like all the other 200 references in the article. You had placed it in a unconventional location. The tool was used to format the dates to match every other one; you used an unconventional date format per the rest of the article. The whole citation method of one parameter per line is also unlike the rest of the article. Please try to be consistent with existing content. BollyJeff | talk 00:09, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Bollyjeff! And hence my revert as well. So there is no need to accuse others of bad faith. --
KRIMUK90 ✉ 02:54, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gaillard Hunt (disambiguation)

A tag has been placed on
section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned
disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or

disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the
see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information
.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Boleyn (talk) 15:37, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Geo_Swan/archive/2014-12&oldid=642071258"