User talk:Gmantakis

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Taivo (talk) 11:40, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

WP:NOTHERE. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. User:Ymblanter (talk) 12:12, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gmantakis (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think i got blocked for no reason. And for time indefinitely? As i understood i was blocked because i was accused that i am pushing nationalists views? I just changed the sentence "ancient state" to "ancient greek state" as everyone knows that Macedonia was an ancient Greek state. I am very open to discuss this matter further.

Decline reason:

Great. Please demonstrate that you obtained consensus for your change (perhaps, on that article's talk page) and did not engage in

edit warring to push your position. Yamla (talk) 12:35, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gmantakis (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

How can i demonstrate that i obtained consensus for my change? By entering the talk page of the specific article i get the message "You are currently unable to edit Wikipedia". I find it a bit not fair being blocked indefinitely. I have not used any bad language. I know other people would just create another user id but that is not what i want to do. I would like to find a solution and discuss this further.

Decline reason:

The point is that you should have obtained consensus first, before attempting to make such a change, or at least not edit warred about it once challenged on it. You will need to describe what the proper ways to

what is required when adding information to an article, before being unblocked. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 13:09, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gmantakis (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The proper ways to achieve consensus is through editing, discussion, consensus building, in talk pages and by soliciting outside opinions. The correct ways to address content disputes are by following the normal protocol, discuss with the other party and disengage. I also understand that when adding content to an article of Wikipedia it is required to citing sources like books, journal articles, newspaper articles, web pages, sound recordings, film, television and video recordings.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficiently convincing for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 14:19, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gmantakis (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The proper ways to achieve consensus is through editing, discussion, consensus building, in talk pages and by soliciting outside opinions. The correct ways to address content disputes are by following the normal protocol, discuss with the other party and disengage. I also understand that when adding content to an article of Wikipedia it is required to citing sources like books, journal articles, newspaper articles, web pages, sound recordings, film, television and video recordings.

Decline reason:

This is word-for-word identical to the previous request, and that request was not sufficiently convincing. You are welcome to make a new request if you substantially reword your request.. Yamla (talk) 18:05, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are currently unable to edit Wikipedia