User talk:Gmhardesty

Hello, Gmhardesty, and

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 23:10, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I would recommend that you withdraw the nomination.

I appreciate your effort and your interest in turning this into a featured article, but it isn't ready yet, and the process of getting it ready would probably take you a few more months of work. If you're willing to continue monitoring the reviews and improving the article, then by all means, you should proceed. But your article isn't ready yet.

For starters, it's normal to get your article through the Good Article process first. A

• The lead section is too short. It needs to summarize all the major points made in the article, but the current version says nothing about the history, goals and beliefs, spiritual or environmental activism. If you dedicate substantial copy to it in the article, it should be in the lead.
• Your section headers should not be capitalized, so "Current activism" not "Current Activism"
• You need better sources. You're relying heavily on their own website - that isn't an independent source.
• Your references aren't formatted properly. That matters when you're talking about Good and Featured articles
• You have unreferenced statements. References should appear immediately after the statements they support. There should be a minimum of one reference per paragraph, and there shouldn’t be any text after the last reference in a paragraph.
• The article is heavily focussed on the present. You need to make sure that you're giving a balanced overview of the last 27 years. Don't skew things too heavily to the present. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:49, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@

Hello, Gmhardesty – I just saw your request for a copy-edit of Indigenous Environmental Network at Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests. I noticed that you copied the instructions for listing a request and did not replace the instructions with your comment. It's all right – someone will accept the assignment and copy-edit the article when it moves up the queue – but normally editors substitute a comment for the instructions. You can write anything you want, and it can be short. Look at some of the other requests for ideas. If you are planning to nominate the article for Good Article status (use "GA" or "GAN") or Featured Article status (use "FAC" for "Featured article candidate") after the copy-edit is completed, you can mention that. Best regards,  – Corinne (talk) 03:43, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IEN copy edit

Hi there, I have accepted your request for a copy edit of the IEN entry. Please check the talk page for comments. Vansk007 (talk) 06:43, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 13:21, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply

The article Indigenous Environmental Network you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Indigenous Environmental Network for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 12:07, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]