User talk:Gollenaiven
Mind Sports Games site
I removed the link to the 2000wmsg.org because I haven't been able to call it for weeks; it seems dead - can you get to it? Maybe there's something weird in my connection. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 13:44, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, the website works fine for me. Sorry for me not explaining my edit properly. Gollenaiven (talk) 21:54, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
Kunming
Please do not remove the copyedit template - the article needs help with copyediting.
The template is used to help other editors find and improve the article. 76.24.10.35 (talk) 22:42, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Reuben Wu
Please stop changing my name to something else which is wrong. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pictionary20 (talk • contribs) 10:07, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
- Chen Zhu - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:58, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:China at the Chess Olympiads
Template:China at the Chess Olympiads has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 16:37, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Yang Xian (chess player) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yang Xian (chess player) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
UtherSRG (talk) 16:22, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Zhang Weida for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zhang Weida until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.