User talk:Googleuser

Welcome!

Hello, Googleuser, and

welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was

and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard
if you wish)

Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Zac67 (talk) 06:19, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

October 2019

MelbourneStar☆^talk 02:58, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Nomination of List of films created with Davinci Resolve for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of films created with Davinci Resolve is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of films created with Davinci Resolve until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 20:22, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 02:45, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Googleuser (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello. I acknowledge that it has appeared that I have attempted Sock puppeting through having multiple Wikipedia accounts. I didn't completely understand the user Wikipedia policy initially, however, I do now. I would really appreciate being unblocked indefinitely as my account was originally blocked about 8 months ago. I think I accidentally signed into the wrong account on a couple of occasions resulting as this appearing as suspicious. In the future, I wish to only use my current Wikipedia account to constructively and positively edit and write on Wikipedia pages. I have not previously and will not seek to engage in disruptive edits or vandalism on the website. I now have read the related policies and guidelines to what has occurred and fully understand how to better contribute to Wikipedia in a non-disruptive way. I appreciate these policies to ensure the credibility of our community's work on Wikipedia. I now understand the problems with having a few Wikipedia accounts and wish to create no more accounts in the future. Thank you. Googleuser (talk) 12:37, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You understood perfectly fine, having been previously blocked for it. You can prove that you intend to start following our policies by refraining from all edits for at least six months, then applying under

WP:SO. At that point, you'll need to drop your claim that you didn't understand you were doing anything wrong. Yamla (talk) 12:46, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.