User talk:Grand51paul

Greetings, wikipedia mavens.

My name is Paul. I have been a resident of the state of Colorado, USA, since 1961. My initial interest in Wikipedia revolves around the local history and geography of the state of Colorado, and specifically my home town, Boulder.

I welcome your comments.

Paul 19:58, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for you help in trying to get the Boulder article under control. The strange political/self-bashing nature of it has been gradually getting out of hand over the past year or so. I think it will continue to be a problem, especially given the nature of politics in Boulder. I think it's also important to battle the bloat in general, as people keep adding unimportant events and trivial details (like the nude pumpkin run or the cost of every newspaper) for some reason. --Junky 21:42, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your 20:04 1-1-2007 editto Denver International Airport, please be aware that we need to use the naming conventions of the topic being discussed. Your subject said that you were changing the wording to be consistant with British usage. However, Denver -- and DIA -- are in the US. Hence, British usage is incorrect. You need American usage.

An editer has already reverted the mentioned edit. Frankly, I have lived in America all my life and I can't say that whether "paved area" or "pavement" would be more correct. However, the subject of your edit was enough for me to bring this up. Will (Talk - contribs) 05:48, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would say no. However, you should probably consult with the person that reverted your edit. If you do switch it back, rather than saying you are using "British" terminology, try stating that you are using "clearer" terminology. Will (Talk - contribs) 21:59, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted this edit to Fifth Down as I think the subsequent fallout and controversy over the Orange Bowl is important to the fallout and aftermath of Fifth Down. I also removed a line that you added stating "No team with two losses has won the NC" (paraphrase) and then cited a source that was a copy of another Wikipedia article. Cite another Wikipedia article (even if it's copied elsewhere) isn't a valid source, and there was some questions over this during the peer review and GA nomination review. If you are going to add cites, please copy the style used in the rest of the article. I do think you are trying to improve the article, so keep up your efforts. Thank you. --MECU≈talk 15:25, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You apparently haven't looked at my userpage. I'm a Colorado fan, so any bias I have for tarnishing their championship to favor GT doesn't fly. All your objections on my talk page didn't address the one critical one I mentioned above: The aftermath of the Fifth Down included a tainted NC, for which completeness of that subject (the tainted NC) requires the mention of this clipping call. The other subjective factors you've mentioned aren't relevant. I won't undo my revert of the sentence, and if you choose to remove it, I would prefer to go through some dispute resolution process that you and I would agree to; even an informal one. --MECU≈talk 13:50, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Paul. What do you think of this: Let's rename the

Hey, I am also a wikipedian in Boulder, and I am wondering if you would like to start a wiki project. --Jimbo Herndan 18:31, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Allright then. I see what you are saying. But there is one thing that I would ask you to do. Could you rearange the list of shops in 29th Street in to a table? thanks. --Jimbo Herndan 03:12, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The first of Wikipedia's five pillars states: Wikipedia is not the place to insert personal opinions, experiences, or arguments. Wikipedia's official guideline on talk pages states: Talk pages are not for general conversation. Keep discussions on the topic of how to improve the associated article. Irrelevant discussions are subject to removal. Therefore, I have removed your personal opinions from the Todd Bertuzzi talk page. --Muéro^(talk/c) 18:17, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yea, thats what i meant --Jimbo Herndan 14:47, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated

You may be interested in these edits by an editor who seems to be on a mission to rewrite secularity, secularism, and the disambiguation page for "secularity" in order to conflate the two terms. Since you did such a good job demystifying this conflation earlier I figured you should know. See [1], [2], [3], [4]. Some of your wisdom might be of use here since, as I said, you have done such good work on these entries.PelleSmith 16:45, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 20:00, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello again

I havent talked to you in quite a while, so, hi again. Anyway, I was wondering of what you thought of the City of Denver template I have been working on. Add content if you wish. I will be working on it from time to time. --Jimbo Herndan 07:50, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Charles W. Johnson (philosopher)

What Wikipedia is not

").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at

sign your comments

with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 03:59, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

CfD nomination of Category:Songs by Tony Hatch

I have nominated Category:Songs by Tony Hatch (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Songs written by Tony Hatch (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 16:20, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gunbarrel CDP vs. Other Classification

Hello Paul! I'm

Gunbarrel, Colorado page using the CDP article as a base. I was unaware - until I read your post - about the typical convention for handling CDP's on Wikipedia. I should have created a separate page rather than walking all over the CDP page. I would certainly like to help with the correction task if you're still pursuing it. My original approach was to treat Gunbarrel as a dual-governance entity. This rationale arose with my reading of the history of its development, beginning with Gunbarrel/Heatherwood, the litigation over city control of utilities, and the significant City of Boulder and County interaction on planning/zoning, transit and public safety, which continues. Within my experience, Gunbarrel residents see themselves as members of a unified and distinct community. Both the incorporated and unincorporated portions of the built-up area bear more demographic and political similarity to each other than to the Boulder city proper. There seems to be particular unity on community development and planning issues. I'd like to hear what you think - in all seriousness, I appreciate the wisdom of my elders in these matters. -- Ucbuffalo81 (talk) 05:35, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

See also Talk:Gunbarrel, Colorado.

This was my original rationale as presented on Talk:Boulder, Colorado :

Anyone interested or can advise on Gunbarrel?

I'm working on the Gunbarrel, Colorado article and would like to connect it with Boulder in some way while keeping it semi-independent - Gunbarrel is both an incorporated Boulder subdivision and a built up area of Boulder County - e.g. you might live there and be a Boulder citizen but your friend in the house across the way lives in the County and is democratically represented in a totally different way. As such it's a strange governmental entity, with a contentious political history and many areas of overlap and dual control and I think this merits separation [from the City of Boulder and CDP articles]. The Boulder country club is there, as well as a residential population that differs politically (more "red") from the rest of Boulder (especially in the unincorporated areas). It is also the location of the Celestial Seasonings plant, Tyco Healthcare Valleylab, and has technical facilities belonging to Ericsson, Lockheed-Martin and Micro Motion - all but the last are in the city's areas. I'd love any help or advice. Ucbuffalo81 01:35, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion of 07-31-2008

Paul: I reverted some of your edits to the Gunbarrel page. This was based on an examination of content in other CDP pages and the guidelines on the Wikipedia Census-designated place primary page. Numerous other CDP pages contain information about the communities which they encompass. In particular I point to the Bostonia, California article. Gunbarrel is a special case, where the CDP, the unincorporated community, and the incorporated Boulder neighborhood are all of the same name, and all either geographically coincident or immediately proximate to one another. Separation into different articles hinders the mission of Wikipedia by creating artificial distinctions between and ignoring the complex intergovernmental relationships between what exists within the CDP and and incorporated portions. These reasons are elucidated further in the post above. I am going to work further to integrate statistics on the Boulder neighborhood and the unincorporated areas which are part of the CDP. I am going to attempt to integrate the data as accessibly and seamlessly as possible, using Bostonia, California CDP as a model. I plan to refer to the pre-revert version of the Gunbarrel page and incorporate your information as much as possible, with aims to avoid confusion and ambiguity which seemed to be your primary concern. Ucbuffalo81 (talk) 08:52, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No content in Category:Roads and Streets in Arizona

WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 20:40, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Unreferenced BLPs

unreferencedBLP

}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Tito Puente, Jr. - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:30, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Please do not add or change content without

reliable sources, as you did to Boulder, Colorado. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 15:40, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Reply to your post at User talk:Roman Spinner#Charles S. Johnson, 1990 Colorado University football, different from Charles Everett Johnson

The above link will point to the comment regarding Charles Johnson (quarterback) which you posted on my discussion page, as well as to my reply.—Roman Spinner (talk) 09:42, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. When you recently edited Mercury (planet), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Morning star and Evening star (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison angular diameter image for Solar eclipse

Thanks for your message and well-spotted, Paul. I've fixed the labels as on the right. The values in the graphic were from the How long will we continue to be able to see total eclipses of the Sun? answer at NASA, but there is a mistake: "...the Sun's angular diameter varies from 32.7 minutes of arc when the Earth is at its farthest point in its orbit (aphelion), and 31.6 arc minutes when it is at its closest (perihelion)." It should appear smaller when farther, so the values should be swapped. I've updated the table and noted this mistake. cmɢʟee☎✉ 13:13, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Do you think File:Comparison_angular_diameter_solar_system.svg is better?

Flagstaff Fire

WikiProject Colorado

Thank you for your great work on the Flagstaff Fire. We hope you'll consider joining WikiProject Colorado. Yours aye,  Buaidh  15:20, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Proposed deletion of

Flagstaff fire

The article

Flagstaff fire has been proposed for deletion

because of the following concern:

Fails

WP:WILDFIRE-NOTE

. Small fire with only local coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 17:08, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tito Puente, Jr. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tito Puente, Jr. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tito Puente, Jr. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]