User talk:Gtscottl

Hello, Gtscottl! adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! PhilKnight (talk) 22:36, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply ]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs Talk pages User scripts

Ghostly Talk

I've restored the Ghostly Talk page. I recommend that you improve the article, because otherwise another editor could nominate it for deletion. PhilKnight (talk) 23:55, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And I've belatedly restored the logo - thanks for the prompt. PhilKnight (talk) 17:49, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk-page comments

They go at the bottom of talk pages. Please don't move your comments on my talk page again. Deor (talk) 04:26, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that

Does the Ghostly Talk Article meet your guidelines now? I plan to do some other thing to improve it also. Gtscottl (talk) 23:35, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re Ghostly Talk AfD

I've said my piece (and I don't think that the new external links you've added constitute

significant coverage in reliable secondary sources). Let's let other Wikipedians have their say, and an administrator will decide the fate of the article on the basis of everyone's comments. Deor (talk) 04:45, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Sorry about that

Ok then, would you like to help me with what I need to do to meet the standard, there are more than enough references on there to make this page notable. :) Do I need to include them in the body of the article?Gtscottl (talk) 23:35, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to read

WP:GROUP. - LuckyLouie (talk) 12:57, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks for your comment. Although I still am not convinced your show meets

WP:N or belongs on WP, I have made some needed changes to bring the article in line with the required neutral, encyclopedic point of view. I don't blame you for being confused about all this. Most people do not understand that Wikipedia isn't a site for posting promotional public relations material about themselves. - LuckyLouie (talk) 19:32, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

One question, I noticed a "Citation_Needed" under the paragraph that mentions some of the guests that have been on the show, can I cite the actual audio links from the Ghostly Talk website? Gtscottl 14:43, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good question. My opinion is that the sources should be something other than your own web pages. But you may want to ask Davidwr since he tagged it. - LuckyLouie (talk) 21:09, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ghostly Talk

Hey, I just got your message. Been busy in life doing other stuff. I see Ghostly Talk survived a deletion request. I wish I was here, because I created the article and feel even now, that it fully meets notability considering the standards as such. The allegations on promotion are entirely ridiculous considering the article was not created with that in mind - I should know, as I created the article. If you need any help in the future, just send me an email, so I know as I don't get onto Wikipedia as much as I used to. --Northmeister (talk) 01:50, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]