User talk:Gwapong Chikoy

January 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 07:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gwapong Chikoy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Unlike most of the users, my research are based on facts, I just don't put the links or references. I'm sorry if I put some things which are not authorized to be put on there. I will post more relevant information afterwards.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 06:22, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gwapong Chikoy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that I am wrong in some ways BUT it does not mean that I'm the only one wrong in this!!! The ones who accused me misunderstood what I want to imply and share, and instead they became selfish and impatient and they're there to judge with their own judgment. But because I am humble somehow, I will not continue to cause disruption and will make useful contributions instead YET discuss those things with these fellow editors in order to deal with these kind of people. Thank you.

Decline reason:

The actions of other people are not relevant here. You are blocked, you need to explain how you will change your behaviour going forward. This does not give me any certainty that you understand why your edits were inappropriate or how you'd edit differently if unblocked. Yamla (talk) 13:17, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gwapong Chikoy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sorry if I put some things which are not authorized to be put on there. I will post more relevant information afterwards. I understand that I am wrong in some ways and I will do better next time. I will also put more RELIABLE SOURCES next time. I will not continue to cause disruption and will make useful contributions instead YET discuss those things with these fellow editors. I will also try to understand them in order to have a peaceful deal. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Per the below, you were socking as recent as today. I am not comfortable unblocking you at this time. SQL ^{Query me!} 20:20, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked for sockpuppetry

illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:05, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Hey, Gwapong Chikoy. You are not doing yourself any favours by continuing to edit while blocked. Just because you are not using your account does not mean your activity is not evident. I suggest you step away from the English Wikipedia project until well after resurrection Sunday. At that point, you might be eligible for a Wikipedia:Standard offer. Please read that several times over the next six months and be prepared not to edit Wikipedia until you open a discussion about the standard offer. I am convinced that if you continue to try to circumvent the block, you will have out-stayed your welcome and no admin will even entertain an unblock request—even one that is reasonably worded.

And for the record, block notices and unblock requests must stay in-place on your talk page while you are blocked. Continuing to remove them will result in loss of editing privileges to your own talk page, which will make asking to be unblocked much more difficult. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:43, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]