User talk:Hayalperest

Selam. You've updated faster than me:)... Ama Tuncay Şanlı'yı güncelleme hızıma yetişemedin:P... Türkçe Vikipedi'de bu tip maddeler sürekli vandallanıyor (bozuluyor). Milli takım gollerini de Türkçe Viki'de ben güncellemeye çalışıyorum. TFF.org'a çok şey borçluyuz vallah... Kolay gelsin, regards...--Sabri76'^message 21:09, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sabri76, selam, thank you for your kind message. Sometimes I spent a lot of time on here and get to do updates very quickly and I guess I did beat you to a few pages ;)

You are right about the Turkish Viki... It is very bad for accuracy and does get vandalised a lot. I'll see you around on pages we both update lol. Regards (Hayalperest (talk) 22:06, 6 September 2009 (UTC)) PS (En Buyuk Turkiye...) :D[reply]

Please accept my apologies for deleting your other edits when I reverted to the last version with Tuncay still at Middlesbrough. What with the vandalism and the copyediting going on at the same time, I thought it would be quickest to go a long way back, and didn't realise how much other work you'd done in the meantime. Hopefully you'll be able to copy it back from the older version. Or if there's anything you'd like me to help with, tidying up the references or whatever, please ask. Again, sorry :-( Struway2 (talk) 17:31, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, dont worry about it. I cant believe how crazy wiki goes just by an announcement of a 'possible' signing - its crazy! Regards (Hayalperest (talk) 22:21, 27 August 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Semi protection Hi I want to request protection for

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Jake Wartenberg 17:10, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly he hasn't moved to Stoke yet and also please stop readding his birth place to the date of birth bracket. You'll see that Wikipedia's best articles such as John Wark and Gilberto Silva don't have this. Spiderone 16:47, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Its the first time that I've added the update to his club info! Also see the reference ive added. confirmation on sky sports.(Hayalperest (talk) 16:50, 27 August 2009 (UTC))[reply]

I apologise. Spiderone 16:51, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

www.antu.com

Hi, I was trying to update a page and this website seemed to be blocked. I am not sure why?

I was trying to add the links to

Regards (Hayalperest (talk) 18:41, 14 August 2009 (UTC))[reply]

This site was blacklisted for cross-wiki spamming, see here. However, I am inclined to grant this request and will do so in around a week unless I see a reason not to. Stifle (talk) 09:27, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Heres an Idea; Since Our readers are better served with english references and links, try;

• http://translate.google.com/translate?js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=antu.com%2FAntuHaberOku.aspx%3FID%3D8482&sl=tr&tl=en&history_state0=

Since translate.google.com is not blacklisted you can use the origional (now translated) article. Cheers --Hu12 (talk) 18:20, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, yes it would be good if it could be un-blocked as the site can then be referenced to all players at the club, etc. Also, thats a good idea about the google-translate tool too. Regards (Hayalperest (talk) 11:57, 19 August 2009 (UTC))[reply]

See

Wikipedia:EL#Non-English_language_content. No reason for whitelisting Turkish content on the English-language Wikipedia, as English language content is preferred. Use translate.google.com. cheers--Hu12 (talk) 19:06, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Agree that having English is better, but some websites translate very badly using the Google-Translate tool. It is effective, but I have checked with the Antu site, and the translation isnt very good. Infact it is pretty bad, it hasn't even translated a lot of the words. I believe it would still be beneficial to have the original site as a reference. I do not believe that this will be detrimental to Wiki. Many pages have foriegn language references, if there are no official site's with the English equivalent. Given the reason for wanting to get *this* site unblocked (ie. as it is the official sponsor and the company that gives the awards), I would rather use Antu instead of google translate, as that would mean I have to translate every page for *each* player's awards which are handed out *each* season. Regards (Hayalperest (talk) 20:27, 23 August 2009 (UTC))[reply]

I know your fairly new (since june), so let me explain. Its first a

resticted link (see #2), this is meta-blacklisted. Additionaly it is not an official link of either articles subject (per WP:EL). Thirdly being both the previous, its is not English language content. In addition I've provided a reasonable alternative, which is available now and in english. Perhaps your request is beter served on the Turkish Wikipedia ? --Hu12 (talk) 22:30, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

No probs... If Wiki rules will not allow this site to be unblocked, then that is the rules, and that is that..? Am a little dissapointed but I am happy to use the alternative Google-Translate if that is what is the only available way to link to the antu.com site. Thank you for your time. Regards (Hayalperest (talk) 23:27, 24 August 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Temporary semi-protection Temporary protection for a couple of days is needed due to vandalism from IP addresses. Do not expect it to continue after 48-72 hours due to nature of article (current footballer speculation). Today the page has had sections blanked and changed from many different IP's. Thus should stop in a couple of days. Regards (Hayalperest (talk) 17:17, 10 August 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days. Malinaccier (talk) 17:29, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ozanozan

I just wanted to say thank you for your contributions to wiki but I have to ask why do you consistantly delete people's edits from the Arda Turan page?

While it is good that you undo vandalism, many edits that you have un-done are not. Wikipedia is a neutral source of information and does not take sides. For example, my edits that I added to Arda Turan's page were more up to date and provided a more in-depth and enhanced information page for him. I updated his club statistics and added the values correctly, as the values before were added wrong. I do not understand why you feel that you needed to delete this. Also I made the headings clickable - such as making 'League' into 'Süper Lig'.

There is no reason that this should be undone, as the information added is correct. If you continue to 'Vandalise' his page, and un-do other people's CORRECT edits, then I will report you for it and you would be banned. I do not want to do this, but you are causing unneeded disruption when, instead, the time could be used to update his page or achievements and recent details, such as the fact that he is now captain, etc, etc.

Thank you for taking time to read this. Don't forget, we are both here to help make Wikipedia article's better, not destroy other peoples work and effort.

Regards, (Hayalperest (talk) 12:40, 9 August 2009 (UTC))[reply]

No reply from Ozanozan - blanked his talk page...? Hmmmm. (Hayalperest (talk) 21:07, 9 August 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Semi protection Consistant Vandalism and spam from IP addresses and new users, please see recent history. Regards Hayalperest (talk) 21:51, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rjd0060 (talk) 23:45, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The individual Hepsi band members fail

Hello, I've checked the WP:Music and in the first box, it stats that a musician is notable if they have had sucess such as had their music in the charts. "Hepsi" the group, have had, and thus each member should have a page created? IE/ for more info on them as individuals such as their DOB's, where they grew up, how old they were when they released the music etc. Otherwise, surely that would be like saying certain members from "Westlife" shouldnt have their own page as some of them havent had solo careers... ? Regards (Hayalperest (talk) 17:03, 4 August 2009 (UTC)) (Hayalperest (talk))[reply]

That section refers to albums by the individuals as entertainers, not albums by the band as a whole - if it was otherwise we'd have articles on musicians from every band that passes that rule. Using Westlife as the example -

Ok, I understand and with re-directing a couple of the Westlife boys that is fair. If that is the rule than it should be enforced consistantly, and with those who have non-notable indiviual careers. So yes I agree with you. I was led to believe that along with Westlife amongst others, that all the individuals from the band could have their own pages. At least Gülçin Ergül should have an individual page as she has now gone solo and left the group Hepsi...? Regards (Hayalperest (talk) 17:13, 4 August 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Yeah, the problem is that people don't always go to the pages with enforcement in mind. If you find any others you think should be redirected, drop me a line on my talkpage and I'll take a look. In regards to her solo career - that career must itself pass WP:MUSIC. If her solo career has resulted in songs that go onto the official charts, for example, then that's fine. Ironholds (talk) 17:20, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, cheers. Regards (Hayalperest (talk) 17:26, 4 August 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Thank you for uploading

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY ^(TALK) 01:50, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for pointing that out, fixed it as soon as realised. I think I was being a bit dozy! Regards, Hayalperest (Hayalperest (talk) 21:27, 30 July 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Dear Hayalperest,

It's a pleasure to be the first to type for your discussion page. I have checked your recent changes on Batuhan Karadeniz's article and I am very happy that there are someone who contributes the articles about Turkish football. However, I have some concerns about those, as well.

I could get that you have edited the article in order to keep it up-to-date, but I could not get why you have removed some sections despite they are referenced by paper news/articles. For instance, I have seen that you changed the playing style section, but you did not strengthen your citations with decent references, instead just kept the existing reference which does not include the words you typed. And this is not even applicable cause that reference is considerably old one when Karadeniz was just a 15 year-old lad and about 6'1,5", which is about 2 inches shorter than today!

Actually, I do agree with your contributions that Karadeniz is stands at 6'3, has a respectable aerial ability, but we must develop the articles in accordance with Wikipedia Policies. Wikipedia is a neutral publication, does take no sides, and against the subjective adjectives over the articles such as Karadeniz to have a "great" aerial ability.

More over, I have noticed that you have completely removed the controversy section. I really can not get why you did that without discussing the terms in "discussion page" first. The thing you did is like you just ignore the incidents which Karadeniz caused. I was about to add the Eskişehir incidents lately and now there is nothing in the article.

Please discuss the significant changes on the articles before you implement them.

Thanks for reading,

Hayalperest (Hayalperest (talk) 21:25, 30 June 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Hello, Hayalperest. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Towers fire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Towers fire until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 16:26, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hayalperest. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]